Strain-injection and crack-path field techniques for 3D crack-propagation modelling in quasi-brittle materials
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a finite element approach for modelling three-dimensional crack propagation in quasi-brittle materials, based on the strain injection and the crack-path field techniques. These numerical techniques were already tested and validated by static and dynamic simulations in 2D classical benchmarks [Dias et al., in: Monograph CIMNE No-134. International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona, (2012); Oliver et al. in Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 274:289–348, (2014); Lloberas-Valls et al. in Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 308:499–534, (2016)] and, also, for modelling tensile crack propagation in real concrete structures, like concrete gravity dams [Dias et al. in Eng Fract Mech 154:288–310, (2016)]. The main advantages of the methodology are the low computational cost and the independence of the results on the size and orientation of the finite element mesh. These advantages were highlighted in previous works by the authors and motivate the present extension to 3D cases. The proposed methodology is implemented in the finite element framework using continuum constitutive models equipped with strain softening and consists, essentially, in injecting the elements candidate to capture the cracks with some goal oriented strain modes for improving the performance of the injected elements for simulating propagating displacement discontinuities. The goal-oriented strain modes are introduced by resorting to mixed formulations and to the Continuum Strong Discontinuity Approach (CSDA), while the crack position inside the finite elements is retrieved by resorting to the crack-path field technique. Representative numerical simulations in 3D benchmarks show that the advantages of the methodology already pointed out in 2D are kept in 3D scenarios
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Areias PMA, Belytschko T (2005) Analysis of three-dimensional crack initiation and propagation using the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63(5):760–788. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.130510.1002/nme.1305 ↗
2. Armero F (2012) Strong discontinuities in antiplane/torsional problems of computational failure mechanics. Int J Fract 178(1–2):3–3210.1007/s10704-012-9695-1 ↗
3. Arrea M, Ingraffea AR (1982) Mixed-mode crack propagation in mortar and concrete. Department of Structural Engineering, Cornell University, New York
4. Baydoun M, Fries TP (2012) Crack propagation criteria in three dimensions using the XFEM and an explicit-implicit crack description. International Journal of Fracture 178(1):51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9762-710.1007/s10704-012-9762-7 ↗
5. Belytschko T, Moes N, Usui S, Parimi C (2001) Arbitrary discontinuities in finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(4):993–1013. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4%3C993::AID-NME164%3E3.0.CO;2-M/abstract10.1002/1097-0207(20010210)50:4<993::AID-NME164>3.0.CO;2-M ↗
6. Benedetti L, Cervera M, Chiumenti M (2016) High-fidelity prediction of crack formation in 2D and 3D pullout tests. Comput Struct 172:93–10910.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.001 ↗
7. Benedetti L, Cervera M, Chiumenti M (2017) 3D numerical modelling of twisting cracks under bending and torsion of skew notched beams. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 176:235–256. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001379441730060710.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.025 ↗
8. Brokenshire DR (1996) A study of torsion fracture tests. Cardiff University, Cardiff
9. Cendón DA, Gálvez JC, Elices M, Planas J (2000) Modelling the fracture of concrete under mixed loading. Int J Fract 103(3):293–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:100768702557510.1023/A:1007687025575 ↗
10. Comi C, Perego U (2001) Numerical aspects of nonlocal damage analyses. Rev Européenne Élém Finis 10(2–4):227–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/12506559.2001.1186924910.1080/12506559.2001.11869249 ↗
11. de Borst R (1986) Non-linear analysis of frictional materials. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology
12. De Borst R, Guitiérrez MA (1999) A unified framework for concrete damage and fracture models including size effects. Int J Fract 95(1):261–277. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101866470589510.1023/A:1018664705895 ↗
13. de Borst R, Mühlhaus H-B (1992) Gradient-dependent plasticity: formulation and algorithmic aspects. Int J Numer Methods Eng 35(3):521–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.162035030710.1002/nme.1620350307 ↗
14. Dias IF, Oliver J, Huespe AE (2012) Strain injection techniques in numerical modeling of propagating material failure. In: International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE) (ed) Monograph CIMNE No-134. International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering, Barcelona
15. Dias IF, Oliver J, Lemos JV, Lloberas-Valls O (2016) Modeling tensile crack propagation in concrete gravity dams via crack-path-field and strain injection techniques. Eng Fract Mech 154:288–31010.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.12.028 ↗
16. Dias-da-Costa D, Alfaiate J, Sluys LJ, Júlio E (2009) A comparative study on the modelling of discontinuous fracture by means of enriched nodal and element techniques and interface elements. Int J Fract 161(1):97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-009-9432-610.1007/s10704-009-9432-6 ↗
17. Ferté G, Massin P, Moës N (2016) 3D crack propagation with cohesive elements in the extended finite element method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 300:347–37410.1016/j.cma.2015.11.018 ↗
18. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2005) Modeling 3D crack propagation in unreinforced concrete using PUFEM. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(25–26):2859–289610.1016/j.cma.2004.07.025 ↗
19. Gasser TC, Holzapfel GA (2006) 3D Crack propagation in unreinforced concrete: a two-step algorithm for tracking 3D crack paths. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(37):5198–521910.1016/j.cma.2005.10.023 ↗
20. Gürses E, Miehe C (2009) A computational framework of three-dimensional configurational-force-driven brittle crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(15):1413–142810.1016/j.cma.2008.12.028 ↗
21. Hakim V, Karma A (2009) Laws of crack motion and phase-field models of fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57(2):342–36810.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.012 ↗
22. Jefferson AD, Barr BIG, Bennett T, Hee SC (2004) Three dimensional finite element simulations of fracture tests using the craft concrete model. Comput Concr 1(3):261–28410.12989/cac.2004.1.3.261 ↗
23. Jirasek M, Grassl P (2008) Evaluation of directional mesh bias in concrete fracture simulations using continuum damage models. Eng Fract Mech 75(8):1921–194310.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.010 ↗
24. Kaczmarczyk Ł, Nezhad MM, Pearce C (2014) Three-dimensional brittle fracture: configurational-force-driven crack propagation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 97(7):531–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.460310.1002/nme.4603 ↗
25. Kaczmarczyk Ł, Ullah Z, Pearce CJ (2017) Energy consistent framework for continuously evolving 3D crack propagation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 324:54–7310.1016/j.cma.2017.06.001 ↗
26. Linder C, Zhang X (2013) A marching cubes based failure surface propagation concept for three-dimensional finite elements with non-planar embedded strong discontinuities of higher-order kinematics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 96(6):339–37210.1002/nme.4546 ↗
27. Lloberas-Valls O, Huespe AE, Oliver J, Dias IF (2016) Strain injection techniques in dynamic fracture modeling. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 308:499–53410.1016/j.cma.2016.05.023 ↗
28. Lloberas-Valls O, Huespe AE, Oliver J, Dias IF (2015) Applications of crack path field and strain injection techniques in dynamic fracture of quasi-brittle materials. In: International conference on computational plasticity, fundamentals and applications (COMPLAS XIII), CIMNE, Editor. Barcelona
29. Mesgarnejad A, Bourdin B, Khonsari MM (2015) Validation simulations for the variational approach to fracture. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 290:420–43710.1016/j.cma.2014.10.052 ↗
30. Miehe C, Hofacker M, Welschinger F (2010) A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(45–48):2765–277810.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
31. Nguyen Q-S, Andrieux S (2005) The non-local generalized standard approach: a consistent gradient theory. C R Méc 333(2):139–14510.1016/j.crme.2004.09.010 ↗
32. Oliver J (1998) The strong discontinuity approach: an overview. In: WCCM98, IV world congress on computational mechanics. Buenos Aires, Argentina, CIMNE
33. Oliver JM, Oller Cervera S, Lubliner J (1990) Isotropic damage models and smeared crack analysis of concrete. In: Proceedings of the SCI-C computer aided analysis and design of concrete structures
34. Oliver J (1989) A consistent characteristic length for smeared cracking models. Int J Numer Methods Eng 28(2):461–47410.1002/nme.1620280214 ↗
35. Oliver J, Cervera M, Manzoli O (1999) Strong discontinuities and continuum plasticity models: the strong discontinuity approach. Int J Plast 15(3):319–35110.1016/S0749-6419(98)00073-4 ↗
36. Oliver J, Huespe AE, Pulido MDG, Chaves E (2002) From continuum mechanics to fracture mechanics: the strong discontinuity approach. Eng Fract Mech 69(2):113–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00060-110.1016/S0013-7944(01)00060-1 ↗
37. Oliver J, Huespe AE, Dias IF (2012) Strain localization, strong discontinuities and material fracture: matches and mismatches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 241–244:323–33610.1016/j.cma.2012.06.004 ↗
38. Oliver J, Dias IF, Huespe AE (2014) Crack-path field and strain-injection techniques in computational modeling of propagating material failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 274:289–34810.1016/j.cma.2014.01.008 ↗
39. Ottosen NS (1981) Nonlinear finite element analysis of pull-out test. J Struct Div ASCE 107(4):591–60310.1061/JSDEAG.0005676 ↗
40. Pijaudier Cabot G, Bazant Z (1987) Nonlocal damage theory. J Eng Mech ASCE 113:1512–1533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:10(1512) ↗
41. Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G (2007) A three-dimensional meshfree method for continuous multiple-crack initiation, propagation and junction in statics and dynamics. Comput Mech 40(3):473–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0122-110.1007/s00466-006-0122-1 ↗
42. Rashid Y (1968) Analysis or prestressed concrete pressure vessels. Nucl Eng Design 7:773–78210.1016/0029-5493(68)90066-6 ↗
43. Rice JR (1976) The localization of plastic deformation. In: Koiter WT (ed) Theoretical and applied mechanics. North-Holland Publ. Co, Amsterdam, pp 207–220
44. Rots JG (1988) Computational modeling of concrete fracture. Delft University of Technology, Delft
45. Rots JG, Nauta P, Kusters GMA, Blaauwendraad J (1985) Smeared crack approach and fracture localization in concrete. Heron 30(1):1–49
46. Simo J, Oliver J, Armero F (1993) An analysis of strong discontinuities induced by strain-softening in rate-independent inelastic solids. Comput Mech 12:277–29610.1007/BF00372173 ↗
47. Sukumar N, Moës N, Moran B, Belytschko T (2000) Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modelling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48(11):1549–1570. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11%3c1549::AID-NME955%3e3.0.CO;2-A10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549::AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
48. Vervuurt A, Van Mier JGM, Schlangen E (1994) Analyses of anchor pull-out in concrete. Mater Struct 27(5):251–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0247304110.1007/BF02473041 ↗