journal article·2013-07

A compliance-based approach to measure fracture resistance curve for surface cracked steel plates

Xudong Qian, Ya Li

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 182· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper proposes a compliance-based approach to determine the fracture resistance $$J$$ – $$R$$ curve for surface cracks in high-strength steel (S690) plate specimens in a four-point-bend set up. This study extends the $$\eta $$ -approach used in the fracture test for the typical specimens with a through-thickness crack, to the surface cracks in plate specimens in calculating the energy release rate from the area below the measured moment versus the crack-plane rotation. The energy release rate, computed from the detailed finite element models using the domain integral approach, confirms a constant $$\eta $$ value for surface cracked steel plates. Coupled with the post-test sectioning, the unloading compliance method quantifies the extended crack-front profiles ahead of the fatigue pre-cracked surface notch, using the crack-size versus the compliance relationship derived from linear-elastic finite element analyses. The fracture resistance curves thus obtained remain similar at different locations along the crack front and comparable with the fracture resistance measured using a standard side-grooved compact tension specimen at a finite crack extension.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. ASTM E1820 (2011) Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) International
2. ASTM E647 (2011) Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) International
3. ASTM E8/E8M (2011) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) International
4. Baba MN, Dogaru F, Curtu I, Dinu G, Bayer M (2010) Experimental determination of interlaminar fracture toughness of wood laminated composite. Mater Plast 47:527–531
5. Begley JA, Landes JD (1972) The J-integral as a fracture criterion. ASTM STP 514, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 1–20
6. Brocks W, Anuschewski P, Hellmann D (2004) A concept for scaling J–R curves by plastic constraint factors. Int J Fract 130:455–469. doi: 10.1023/B:FRAC.0000049505.30379.5410.1023/B:FRAC.0000049505.30379.54 ↗
7. BS7910 (2005) Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures. British Standard Institute
8. Burdekin FM (2002) The fracture behavior of a welded tubular joint—an ESIS TC1-3 round robin on failure assessment methods: part III-UK BS7910 methodology. Eng Fract Mech 69:1119–1127. doi: 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00142-410.1016/S0013-7944(01)00142-4 ↗
9. Carka D, Landis CM (2011) On the path-dependence of the $$J$$ -integral near a stationary crack in an elastic-plastic material. J Appl Mech ASME 78:011006. doi: 10.1115/1.400174810.1115/1.4001748 ↗
10. Cravero S, Ruggieri C (2007) Estimation procedure of J-resistance curves for SE(T) fracture specimens using unloading compliance. Eng Fract Mech 74:2735–2757. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.01.012 ↗
11. Cravero S, Ruggieri C (2008) Further developments in J evaluation procedure for growing cracks based on LLD and CMOD data. Int J Fract 148:387–400. doi: 10.1007/s10704-008-9211-910.1007/s10704-008-9211-9 ↗
12. Cravero S, Bravo RE, Ernst HA (2008) Correlation of fracture behavior in circumferentially cracked pipes under combined load conditions using SENT specimens: effects on J–R resistance curves. Proc ASME Press Vessel Pip Conf 6:1301–1309 doi: 10.1115/PVP2008-6124610.1115/PVP2008-61246 ↗
13. Gubeljak N, Chapetti MD, Predan J, Landes JD (2011) CTOD–R curve construction from surface displacement measurement. Eng Fract Mech 78:2286–2297. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.05.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.05.002 ↗
14. Gullerud AS, Koppenhoefer K, Roy A, RoyChowdhury S, Walters M, Bichon B, Cochran K, Carlyle A, Dodds Jr RH (2012) WARP3D: 3-D dynamic nonlinear fracture analysis of solids using parallel computers and workstations. Structural research series (SRS) 607. UILU-ENG-95-2012, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign
15. Gupta SK, Bhasin V, Vaze KK, Ghosh AK, Kushwaha HS, Chapuliot S, Marie S, Kayser I (2006) Derivation of J-resistance curve for through wall cracked pipes from crack mouth opening displacement. Int J Pres Ves Pip 83:686–699. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.05.00410.1016/j.ijpvp.2006.05.004 ↗
16. ISO 22889 (2007) Metallic materials—method of test for the determination of resistance to stable crack extension using specimens of low constraint. International Standard Organization
17. ISO 12135 (2008) Metallic materials—unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness. International Standard Organization
18. ISO 12737 (2010) Metallic materials—determination of plane-strain fracture toughness. International Standard Organization
19. McMeeking RM, Parks DM (1979) On criteria for J-dominance of crack-tip fields in large-scale yielding. Elast Plast Fract ASTM STP 668:175–19410.1520/STP35830S ↗
20. Park S, Yoo S-S, Min J-K, Koo J-M, Seok CS (2012) Evaluation of fracture toughness characteristics for nuclear piping using various types of specimens. Int J Pres Ves Pip 90–91:9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.10.00210.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.10.002 ↗
21. Pavankumar TV, Samal MK, Chattopadhyay J, Dutta BK, Kushwaha HS, Roos E, Seidenfuss M (2005) Transferability of fracture parameters from specimens to component level. Int J Pres Ves Pip 82:386–399. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.10.00310.1016/j.ijpvp.2004.10.003 ↗
22. Piascik RS, Newman JC, Underwood JH (1997) The extended compact tension specimen. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 20:559–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00287.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1997.tb00287.x ↗
23. Qian X, Yang W (2011) A hybrid approach to determine fracture resistance for mode I and mixed-mode I and II fracture specimens. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 34:305–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01519.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01519.x ↗
24. Qian X, Yang W (2012) Initiation of ductile fracture in mixed-mode I and II aluminum alloy specimens. Eng Fract Mech 93:189–203. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.01810.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.018 ↗
25. Qian X, Dodds Jr RH, Choo YS (2005) Elastic–plastic crack driving force for tubular X-joints with mismatched welds. Eng Struct 27:1419–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.01310.1016/j.engstruct.2005.03.013 ↗
26. Qian X, Dodds Jr RH, Choo YS (2007) Elastic–plastic crack driving force for tubular K-joints with mismatched welds. Eng Struct 29:865–879. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.02410.1016/j.engstruct.2006.06.024 ↗
27. Qian X, Li Y, Ou Z (2013) Ductile tearing assessment of high-strength steel X-joints under in-plane bending. Eng Fail Anal 28:176–191. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.01710.1016/j.engfailanal.2012.10.017 ↗
28. Quest Reliability Group (2011) FEA CRACK version 3.2 users’ manual
29. Rice JR, Paris PC, Merkle JG (1973) Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates. ASTM STP 536, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philidelphia, pp 23–24510.1520/STP49643S ↗
30. Sanyal G, Samal MK (2012) Fracture behavior of thin-walled Zircaloy fuel clad tubes of Indian pressurized heavy water reactor. Int J Fract 173:175–188. doi: 10.1007/s10704-012-9678-210.1007/s10704-012-9678-2 ↗
31. Sanyal G, Samal MK, Chakravartty JK, Ray KK, Suri AK, Banerjee S (2011) Prediction of $$J$$ – $$R$$ curves of thin-walled fuel pin specimens in a PLT setup. Eng Fract Mech 78:1029–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.007 ↗
32. Shih CF, Moran B, Nakamura T (1986) Energy release rate along a three-dimensional crack front in a thermally stressed body. Int J Fract 30:79–102. doi: 10.1007/BF0003401910.1007/BF00034019 ↗
33. Sumpter JDG (2006) Size effects in tearing stability: an analysis based on energy dissipation rate. Eng Fract Mech 74:2352–2374. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.00910.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.11.009 ↗
34. Urriolagoitia-Sosa G, Romero-Angeles B, Hernandez-Gomez LH, Torres-Torres C, Urriolagoitia-Calderon G (2011) Crack compliance method for assessing residual stress due to loading/unloading history: numerical and experimental analysis. Theor Appl Fract Mech 56:188–199. doi: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.00710.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.007 ↗
35. Yang W, Qian X (2012) Fracture resistance curve over the complete mixed-mode I and II range for 5083 aluminum alloy. Eng Fract Mech. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.02210.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.022 ↗
36. Zhu X-K, Joyce JA (2012) Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization. Eng Fract Mech 85:1–46. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.00110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001 ↗