journal article·2018-10

Geomechanical optimization of hydraulic fracturing in unconventional reservoirs: a semi-analytical approach

Ali Taghichian, Hamid Hashemalhoseini, Musharraf Zaman, Zon-Yee Yang

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 213· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Unconventional drilling and completion architecture includes drilling multilateral horizontal wells in the direction of minimum horizontal stress and simultaneous multistage fracturing treatments perpendicular to the wellbore. This drilling and stimulation strategy is utilized in order to raise the connectivity of the reservoir to the wellbore, thereby remedying the low permeability problem, increasing reserve per well, enhancing well productivity, and improving project economics in this type of reservoir. However, in order to have the highest production with the least cost, an optimization technique should be used for the fracturing treatment. According to the fact that aperture, propagation direction, and propagation potential of hydraulic fractures are of paramount importance in optimization of the fracking treatment, in this research paper, these three major factors are studied in detail, the control variables on these three factors are examined, and the effect of each factor is quantified by proposing a complete set of equations. Using the proposed set of equations, one can make a good estimate about the fracture aperture (directly controlling the fracture conductivity), the stress shadow size (directly controlling the fracture path), and the change of stress intensity factor (directly controlling the fracture propagation potential). A geomechanical optimization procedure is then presented for toughness-dominated and viscosity-dominated regimes based on the proposed equations that can be used for estimation of different optimal fracturing patterns. The most efficient fracturing pattern can be determined afterward via considering the cumulative production using a reservoir simulator e.g. ECLIPSE, Schlumberger. This procedure is likely to offer an optimal simultaneous multistage hydraulic fracture treatment without deviation or collapse, with no fracture trapping, with the highest possible propagation potential in the hydrocarbon producing shale layer, and a predicted aperture for proppant type/size decision and conductivity of the fractures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis · Drilling and Well Engineering · Groundwater flow and contamination studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Andrews A, Folger P, Humphries M, Copeland C, Tiemann M, Meltz R, Brougher C (2009) Unconventional gas shales: development, technology, and policy issues. Congressional research service
2. Bunger AP, Detournay E, Garagash DI (2005) Toughness-dominated hydraulic fracture with leak-off. Int J Fract 134:175–19010.1007/s10704-005-0154-0 ↗
3. Broek D (1982) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, Third Revised edn. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston10.1007/978-94-011-9055-8 ↗
4. Chen Z (2012) Finite element modelling of viscosity-dominated hydraulic fractures. J Petrol Sci Eng 88–89:136–14410.1016/j.petrol.2011.12.021 ↗
5. Cheng Y (2009) Boundary element analysis of the stress distribution around multiple fractures: implications for the spacing of perforation clusters of hydraulically fractured horizontal wells. SPE 12576910.2118/125769-MS ↗
6. Desroches J, Detournay E, Lenoach B, Papanastasiou P, Pearson J, Thiercelin M, Cheng A-D (1994) The crack tip region in hydraulic fracturing. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 447:39–4810.1098/rspa.1994.0127 ↗
7. Detournay E, Peirce AP, Bunger AP (2007) Viscosity-dominated Hydraulic fractures. American Rock Mechanics Association, Alexandria10.1201/NOE0415444019-c207 ↗
8. Dusseault M, McLennan J (2011) Massive multistage hydraulic fracturing: where are we? ARMA (American Rock Mechanics Association) e-Newsletter. Published 01/2011
9. Fisher MK, Heinze JR, Harris CD, Davidson BM, Wright CA, Dunn KP (2004) Optimizing horizontal completion techniques in the Barnett shale using microseismic fracture mapping. Paper SPE 90051 presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Houston, Texas, 26–29 September10.2118/90051-MS ↗
10. Fowell RJ (1995) Suggested methods for determining mode I fracture toughness using cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc specimens. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:57–6410.1016/0148-9062(94)00015-U ↗
11. Green AE, Sneddon IN (1950) The distribution of stress in the neighbourhood of a flat elliptical crack in an elastic solid. Proc Camb Philos Soc 47:159–16410.1017/S0305004100025585 ↗
12. Guidera JT, Lardner RW (1975) Penny-shaped cracks. J Elast 5:59–7310.1007/BF01389258 ↗
13. Hoek E (2001) Rock mass properties for underground mines. In: Hustrulid WA, Bullock RL (eds) Underground mining methods: engineering fundamentals and international case studies. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration (SME), Litleton
14. Irwin GR (1962) The crack extension force for a part-through crack in a plate. ASME J Appl Mech 29(4):651–65410.1115/1.3640649 ↗
15. Kassir MK (1981) Stress-intensity factor for a three-dimensional rectangular crack. ASME J Appl Mech 48:309–31210.1115/1.3157614 ↗
16. Keer LM (1964) A class of nonaxisymmetrical punch and crack problems. Q J Mech Appl Math 17:423–43610.1093/qjmam/17.4.423 ↗
17. Khlaifat A, Qutob H, Arastoopour H (2011) Influence of a single fracture and its aperture on gas production from a tight reservoir. Advancing the world of petroleum geosciences (AAPG), Search and Discovery Article, p 40732
18. King GE, Haile L, Shuss J, Dobkins TA (2008) Increasing fracture path complexity and controlling downward fracture growth in the Barnett Shale. SPE 11989610.2118/119896-MS ↗
19. Kumar D, Ghassemi A (2018) Three-dimensional poroelastic modeling of multiple hydraulic fracture propagation from horizontal wells. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 105:192–20910.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.01.010 ↗
20. Lister J (1990) Buoyancy-driven fluid fracture: the effects of material toughness and of low-viscosity precursors. J Fluid Mech 210:263–28010.1017/S0022112090001288 ↗
21. Mastrojannis EN, Keer LM, Mura T (1979) Stress intensity factor for a plane crack under normal pressure. Int J Fract 15(3):247–25810.1007/BF00033223 ↗
22. Mi L, Jiang H, Li J, Li T, Tiana Y (2014) The investigation of fracture aperture effect on shale gas transport using discrete fracture model. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 21:631–63510.1016/j.jngse.2014.09.029 ↗
23. Morrill JC, Miskimins JL (2012) Optimizing hydraulic fracture spacing in unconventional Shales. SPE 152595, SPE hydraulic fracturing technology conference, The Woodlands, TX, 5–8 February10.2118/152595-MS ↗
24. Murakami Y (1987) Stress intensity factors handbook, vol 1. Pergamon, Oxford
25. Mutalik PN, Gibson B (2008) Case history of sequential and simultaneous fracturing of the Barnett shale in Parker county. Presented at the 2008 SPE annual technical conference and exhibition held in Denver, USA, 21–24 September10.2118/116124-MS ↗
26. Ouchterlony F (1988) Suggested methods for determining the fracture toughness of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 25:71–96
27. Roussel NP, Sharma M (2011) Strategies to minimize frac spacing and stimulate natural fractures in horizontal completions. SPE 146104
28. Sadowsky MA, Sternberg E (1949) Stress concentration around a triaxial ellipsoidal cavity. J Appl Mech 149(16):469–479
29. Savitski AA, Detournay E (2002) Propagation of a penny-shaped fluid-driven fracture in an impermeable rock: asymptotic solutions. Int J Solids Struct 39:6311–633710.1016/S0020-7683(02)00492-4 ↗
30. Salimzadeh S, Usui T, Paluszny A, Zimmerman RW (2017) Finite element simulations of interactions between multiple hydraulic fractures in a poroelastic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 99:9–2010.1016/j.ijrmms.2017.09.001 ↗
31. Shah RC, Kobayashi AS (1971) Stress intensity factor for an elliptical crack under arbitrary normal loading. Eng Fract Mech 3:71–9610.1016/0013-7944(71)90052-X ↗
32. Sih GC (1973) Handbook of stress-intensity factors: stress-intensity factor: solutions and formulas for references. Institute of Fracture and Solid Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem
33. Singh I, Miskimins JL (2010) A numerical study of the effects of packer-induced stresses and stress shadowing on fracture initiation and stimulation of horizontal wells. CSUG/SPE 136856. Presentation at the Canadian Unconventional Resources and International Petroleum Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 19–21 October10.2118/136856-MS ↗
34. Sneddon IN, Elliot HA (1946) The opening of a griffith crack under internal pressure. Q Appl Math 4(3):262–26710.1090/qam/17161 ↗
35. Sneddon IN, Lowengrub M (1969) Crack problems in the classical theory of elasticity. Wiley, New York
36. Soliman MY, Boonen P (1997) Review of fractured horizontal wells technology. SPE 36289
37. Spence DA, Sharp PW (1985) Self-similar solution for elastohydrodynamic cavity flow. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 400:289–31310.1098/rspa.1985.0081 ↗
38. Tada H, Paris PC, Irwin GR (2000) The stress analysis of cracks handbook, 3rd edn. ASME Press, New York10.1115/1.801535 ↗
39. Taghichian A, Zaman M, Devegowda D (2014) Stress shadow size and aperture of hydraulic fractures in unconventional shales. J Petrol Sci Eng 124:209–22110.1016/j.petrol.2014.09.034 ↗
40. Taghichian A, Zaman M, Hashemalhoseini H, Beheshti Zavareh S (2018) Propagation and aperture of staged hydraulic fractures in unconventional resources in toughness-dominated regimes. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 10:249–25810.1016/j.jrmge.2017.08.003 ↗
41. US Energy Information Administration (2011) Annual energy outlook. http://www.eia.gov
42. Warpinski NR, Branagan PT, Peterson RE, Fix JE, Uhl JE, Engler BP, Wilmer R (1997) Microseismic and deformation imaging of hydraulic fracture growth and geometry in the C sand interval, GRI/DOE M-site project. Paper SPE 38573 presented at the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, 5–8 October10.2118/38573-MS ↗
43. Waters G, Dean B, Downie R, Kerrihard K, Austbo L, McPherson B (2009) Simultaneous hydraulic fracturing of adjacent horizontal wells in the Woodford Shale. SPE 11963510.2118/119635-MS ↗
44. Willis LR (1968) The stress field around an elliptical crack in an anisotropic medium. Int J Eng Sci 6:253–26310.1016/0020-7225(68)90025-6 ↗
45. Wong SW, Geilikman M, Xu G (2013) Interaction of multiple hydraulic fractures in horizontal wells. SPE 16398210.2118/163982-MS ↗
46. Wu K, Olson JE (2014) Simultaneous multifracture treatments: fully coupled fluid flow and fracture mechanics for horizontal wells. SPE10.2118/167626-STU ↗
47. Xu W, Calvez JL, Thiercelin M (2009) Characterization of hydraulically-induced fracture network using treatment and microseismic data in a tight gas formation: a geomechanical approach Abstract SPE 125237 and slides. Presented at SPE tight gas completions conference San Antonio, TX, USA, 15–17 June10.2118/125237-MS ↗
48. Yu W, Sepehrnoori K (2013) Optimization of multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in unconventional gas reservoirs. SPE 16450910.2118/164509-MS ↗