journal article·2017-04

Non-differentiable energy minimization for cohesive fracture

Katerina D. Papoulia

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 204· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

An energy minimization approach to initially rigid cohesive fracture is proposed, whose key feature is a term for the energy stored in the interfaces that is nondifferentiable at the origin. A consequence of this formulation is that there is no need to define an activation criterion as a separate entity from the traction-displacement relationship itself. Instead, activation happens automatically when the load reaches a critical level because the minimizer of the potential no longer occurs at the 0-displacement level. Thus, the activation computation necessary in previous initially rigid formulations is now replaced by the computation of a minimizer of a nondifferentiable objective function. This immediately makes the method more amenable to implicit time stepping, since the activation criterion no longer interacts with the nonlinear solver for the next time step. A novel extension of the functional to the dynamic case is presented. The optimization problem is solved by a continuation (homotopy) method used in conjunction with an augmented Lagrangian and a trust region minimization algorithm to find the minimal energy configuration. Because the approach eliminates the need for an activation criterion, the algorithm sidesteps the complexities of time-discontinuity and traction-locking previously observed in relation to initially rigid models.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Composite Material Mechanics · Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–12910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
2. Bourdin B, Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (2000) Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 48(4):797–82610.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
3. Clarke FH (1990) Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia10.1137/1.9781611971309 ↗
4. Del Piero G, Lancioni G, March R (2013) A diffuse cohesive energy approach to fracture and plasticity: the one-dimensional case. J Mech Mater Struct 8(2):109–15110.2140/jomms.2013.8.109 ↗
5. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing cracks. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
6. Eshelby J (1999) Energy relations and the energy-momentum tensor in continuum mechanics. In: Fundamental contributions to the continuum theory of evolving phase interfaces in solids, Springer, pp. 82–11910.1007/978-3-642-59938-5_5 ↗
7. Francfort GA, Marigo JJ (1998) Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem. J Mech Phys Solids 46(8):1319–134210.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
8. Ganguly P, Vavasis SA, Papoulia KD (2006) An algorithm for two-dimensional mesh generation based on the pinwheel tiling. SIAM J Sci Comput 28(4):1533–156210.1137/040611343 ↗
9. Gao Y, Bower A (2004) A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 12(3):45310.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
10. Gay DM (1981) Computing locally optimal constrained steps. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 2:186–19710.1137/0902016 ↗
11. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A, Contain Papers Math Phys Charact 221:163–19810.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
12. Ha YD, Bobaru F (2011) Characteristics of dynamic brittle fracture captured with peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 78(6):1156–116810.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.020 ↗
13. Hairer E, Nørsett S, Wanner G (1993) Solving ordinary differential equations I: nonstiff problems, vol 8. Springer Ser Comput Math, Berlin
14. Hansbo P, Salomonsson K (2015) A discontinuous Galerkin method for cohesive zone modelling. Finite Elem Anal Des 102:1–610.1016/j.finel.2015.04.008 ↗
15. Klein P, Foulk J, Chen E, Wimmer S, Gao H (2001) Physics-based modeling of brittle fracture: cohesive formulations and the application of meshfree methods. Tech. Rep. SAND2001-8099, Sandia National Laboratories10.2172/772347 ↗
16. Knowles JK, Sternberg E (1983) Large deformations near a tip of an interface-crack between two Neo-Hookean sheets. J Elast 13:257–29310.1007/BF00042997 ↗
17. Levenberg K (1944) A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Q Appl Math 2:164–16810.1090/qam/10666 ↗
18. Li B, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2015) Material-point erosion simulation of dynamic fragmentation of metals. Mech Mater 80:288–29710.1016/j.mechmat.2014.03.008 ↗
19. Marquardt D (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J SIAM 11:431–441
20. Miehe C, Gürses E, Birkle M (2007) A computational framework of configurational-force-driven brittle fracture based on incremental energy minimization. Int J Fract 145(4):245–25910.1007/s10704-007-9078-1 ↗
21. Mielke A (2004) Existence of minimizers in incremental elasto-plasticity with finite strains. SIAM J Math Anal 36(2):384–40410.1137/S0036141003429906 ↗
22. Moës N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Frac Mech 69(7):813–83310.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
23. Moré JJ, Sorensen DC (1983) Computing a trust region step. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 4:553–57210.1137/0904038 ↗
24. Mosler J, Scheider I (2011) A thermodynamically and variationally consistent class of damage-type cohesive models. J Mech Phys Solids 59(8):1647–166810.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.012 ↗
25. Mura T (2013) Micromechanics of defects in solids. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
26. Nocedal J, Wright S (2006) Numerical optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
27. Oliver J, Huespe AE, Pulido MDG, Chaves E (2002) From continuum mechanics to fracture mechanics: the strong discontinuity approach. Eng Frac Mech 69:113–13610.1016/S0013-7944(01)00060-1 ↗
28. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three dimensional crack propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267–128210.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
29. Ortiz M, Stainier L (1999) The variational formulation of viscoplastic constitutive updates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 171:419–44410.1016/S0045-7825(98)00219-9 ↗
30. Pandolfi A, Conti S, Ortiz M (2006) A recursive-faulting model of distributed damage in confined brittle materials. J Mech Phys Solids 54(9):1972–200310.1016/j.jmps.2006.02.003 ↗
31. Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2012) An eigenerosion approach to brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 92(8):694–71410.1002/nme.4352 ↗
32. Papoulia KD (2008) Isotropy of fracture paths and random microstructures. In: Proceedings, 3d Canadian conference on nonlinear solid mechanics, Toronto
33. Papoulia KD, Sam CH, Vavasis SA (2003) Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58(5):679–70110.1002/nme.778 ↗
34. Papoulia KD, Vavasis SA, Ganguly P (2006) Spatial convergence of crack nucleation using a cohesive finite element model on a pinwheel-based mesh. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67(1):1–1610.1002/nme.1598 ↗
35. Park K, Paulino GH, Roesler JR (2009) A unified potential-based cohesive model of mixed-mode fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 57:891–90810.1016/j.jmps.2008.10.003 ↗
36. Paulino GH, Park K, Celes W, Espinha R (2010) Adaptive dynamic cohesive fracture simulation using nodal perturbation and edge-swap operators. Int J Numer Methods Eng 84:1303–134310.1002/nme.2943 ↗
37. Radovitzky R, Seagraves A, Tupek M, Noels L (2011) A scalable 3d fracture and fragmentation algorithm based on a hybrid, discontinuous Galerkin, cohesive element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(1):326–34410.1016/j.cma.2010.08.014 ↗
38. Remmers JJ, de Borst R, Needleman A (2008) The simulation of dynamic crack propagation using the cohesive segments method. J Mech Phys Solids 56(1):70–9210.1016/j.jmps.2007.08.003 ↗
39. Rice JR (1976) The localization of plastic deformation in theoretical and applied mechanics. North-Holland, Amsterdam
40. Rittel D, Maigre H (1996) A study of mixed-mode dynamic crack initiation in PMMA. Mech Res Commun 23(5):475–48110.1016/0093-6413(96)00047-X ↗
41. Sam CH, Papoulia KD, Vavasis SA (2005) Obtaining initially rigid cohesive finite element models that are temporally convergent. Eng Frac Mech 72(14):2247–226710.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.12.008 ↗
42. Sanz-Serna JM, Calvo MP (1994) Numerical hamiltonian problems. Chapman-Hall, London10.1007/978-1-4899-3093-4 ↗
43. Schmidt B, Fraternali F, Ortiz M (2009) Eigenfracture: an eigendeformation approach to variational fracture. Multiscale Model Simul 7(3):1237–126610.1137/080712568 ↗
44. Settgast RR, Rashid MM (2009) Continuum coupled cohesive zone elements for analysis of fracture in solid bodies. Eng Frac Mech 76(11):1614–163510.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.02.024 ↗
45. Shewchuk JR (2002) A two-dimensional quality mesh generator and Delaunay triangulator. Computer Science Division, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA Tech. rep
46. Song JH, Menouillard T, Tabarraei A (2013) Explicit dynamic finite element method for failure with smooth fracture energy dissipations. Math Probl Eng. doi: 10.1155/2013/29386110.1155/2013/293861 ↗
47. Steinmann P, Ackermann D, Barth F (2001) Application of material forces to hyperelastostatic fracture mechanics. II. computational setting. Int J Solids Struct 38(32):5509–552610.1016/S0020-7683(00)00381-4 ↗
48. Verhoosel CV, Scott MA, De Borst R, Hughes TJ (2011) An isogeometric approach to cohesive zone modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(1–5):336–36010.1002/nme.3061 ↗
49. Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42(9):1397–143410.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗