Direct observation of the thickness effect on critical crack tip opening displacement in freestanding copper submicron-films by in situ electron microscopy fracture toughness testing
Source abstract
Abstract
We evaluated the thickness effect on fracture toughness in freestanding Cu films with thicknesses of approximately 100, 500, and 2600 nm, on the basis of crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) concept by means of in situ (field emission scanning electron microscopy) FESEM and (transmission electron microscopy) TEM fracture toughness testing. During testing, an acute pre-crack tip blunted gradually and necking deformation in the out-of-plane direction occurred in the region ahead of the crack tip in all the specimens. A crack then initiated from the pre-crack tip and propagated along the necking region resulting in chisel point fracture. Since the small scale yielding condition was not satisfied in the 500 and 2600 nm specimens, the critical CTOD, $$\delta _\mathrm{i}$$ , at the onset of crack extension was directly evaluated from the in situ images. The results indicate a clear thickness effect on $$\delta _\mathrm{i}$$ (i.e. $$\delta _\mathrm{i}$$ decreases as the thickness decreases). Normalized critical CTOD, defined as $$\delta _\mathrm{{i}}/B$$ (where $$B$$ is the thickness), of 100 and 500 nm specimens are similar, $$\delta _\mathrm{{i}}/B = 1.6$$ . This suggests the presence of a fracture criterion, $$\delta _\mathrm{{i}} = 1.6B$$ , in the submicron scale regardless of the film thickness. On the other hand, $$\delta _\mathrm{{i}}/B$$ of the 2600 nm specimen was roughly half of those of the 100 and 500 nm specimens.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics : fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton10.1201/9781420058215 ↗
2. Armstrong DEJ, Wilkinson AJ, Roberts SG (2009) Measuring anisotropy in young’s modulus of copper using microcantilever testing. J Mater Res 24:3268–3276. doi: 10.1557/Jmr.2009.039610.1557/jmr.2009.0396 ↗
3. ASTM-E399-90 Standard Test Method for Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness of Metallic Materials
4. ASTM-E1820-01 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
5. Broberg KB (1971) Crack-growth criteria and non-linear fracture mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 19:407–418. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(71)90008-110.1016/0022-5096(71)90008-1 ↗
6. Burdekin FM, Stone DEW (1966) The crack opening displacement approach to fracture mechanics in yielding materials. J Strain Anal Eng Des 1:145–153. doi: 10.1243/03093247V01214510.1243/03093247V012145 ↗
7. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–104. doi: 10.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-210.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
8. ESIS-P2-92 Procedure for Determining the Fracture Behaviour of Materials
9. Espinosa HD, Prorok BC, Peng B (2004) Plasticity size effects in free-standing submicron polycrystalline FCC films subjected to pure tension. J Mech Phys Solids 52:667–689. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2003.07.00110.1016/j.jmps.2003.07.001 ↗
10. Greer JR, Nix WD (2006) Nanoscale gold pillars strengthened through dislocation starvation. Phys Rev B 73:245410. doi: 10.1103/Physrevb.73.24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
11. Haque MA, Saif MTA (2004) Deformation mechanisms in free-standing nanoscale thin films: a quantitative in situ transmission electron microscope study. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6335–6340. doi: 10.1073/pnas.040006610110.1073/pnas.0400066101 ↗
12. Hirakata H, Fukuhara N, Ajioka S, Yonezu A, Sakihara M, Minoshima K (2012) The effect of thickness on the steady-state creep properties of freestanding aluminum nano-films. Acta Mater 60:4438–4447. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.03610.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.036 ↗
13. Hirakata H, Nishijima O, Fukuhara N, Kondo T, Yonezu A, Minoshima K (2011) Size effect on fracture toughness of freestanding copper nano-films. Mat Sci Eng A-Struct 528:8120–8127. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.07.07110.1016/j.msea.2011.07.071 ↗
14. Knott JF (1971) Mechanics and mechanisms of large-scale brittle fracture in structural metals. Mater Sci Eng 7:1–36. doi: 10.1016/0025-5416(71)90058-910.1016/0025-5416(71)90058-9 ↗
15. Knott JF (1973) Fundamentals of fracture mechanics. Butterworth, London
16. Kondo T, Hirakata H, Minoshima K (2014) Fatigue crack closure in freestanding copper submicron-films (submitted)10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.023 ↗
17. Kondo T, Imaoka T, Hirakata H, Sakihara M, Minoshima K (2013) Effects of stress ratio on fatigue crack propagation properties of submicron-thick free-standing copper films. Acta Mater 61:6310–6327. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.01710.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.017 ↗
18. Murakami Y (1986) Stress intensity factors handbook, vol 1. Pergamon Press, Oxford
19. Schwalbe KH, Newman JC, Shannon JL (2005) Fracture mechanics testing on specimens with low constraint—standardisation activities within ISO and ASTM. Eng Fract Mech 72:557–576. doi: 10.1016/j.engfrachmech.2004.04.00610.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.04.006 ↗
20. Uchic MD, Dimiduk DM, Florando JN, Nix WD (2004) Sample dimensions influence strength and crystal plasticity. Science 305:986–98910.1126/science.1098993 ↗
21. Wang HW, Kang YL, Zhang ZF, Qin QH (2003) Size effect on the fracture toughness of metallic foil. Int J Fract 123:177–185. doi: 10.1023/B:Frac.0000007376.06477.E810.1023/B:FRAC.0000007376.06477.e8 ↗