Effect of prestrain on ductility and toughness in a high-strength line pipe steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Fracture properties of a mother plate for API grade X100 line pipe after pre-straining up to 6% are investigated using tensile notched bars and CT pre-cracked specimens. The material has an anisotropic plastic and damage behavior due to the thermo-mechanical control rolling process. Experiments evidence a decrease in both ductility and toughness for both rolling and long transverse direction with increasing prestrains. This effect is however more pronounced at low prestrain levels ( $$0\rightarrow 2\%$$ ) than at higher levels ( $$2\rightarrow 4\rightarrow 6\%$$ ). The modified GTN model proposed by Shinohara et al. (Int J Fract 197:127–145, 2016) is used to represent the database. A good agreement is obtained provided some damage model parameters are modified so as to obtain a slightly higher damage rate for the prestrained materials. This represents the fact that void growth tends to be faster for materials with a lower work hardening rate as evidenced by unit cell calculations. In addition, stress/strain distributions in test specimens are modified for reduced hardening so that stress triaxiality is increased at failure initiation points. This further lowers measured mechanical properties.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Alinaghian Y, Asadi M, Weck A (2014) Effect of pre-strain and work hardening rate on void growth and coalescence in AA5052. Int J Plast 53:193–20510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.08.007 ↗
2. Asahi H, Hara T, Tsuru E, Morimoto H (2009) 2009. Development and commercialization of high-strength linepipe. In: Proc. pipeline technology conference, Ostend, pp 12–14
3. ASTM-1820 (2008) Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness. Technical report
4. Baek J-H, Kim Y-P, Kim C, Kim W, Seok C (2010) Effects of pre-strain on the mechanical properties of API 5L X65 pipe. Mater Sci Eng A 527(6):1473–147910.1016/j.msea.2009.10.017 ↗
5. Barlat F, Lege D, Brem J (1991) A six-component yield function for anisotropic materials. Int J Plast 7:693–71210.1016/0749-6419(91)90052-Z ↗
6. Barlat F, Aretz H, Yoon J, Karabin M, Brem J, Dick R (2005) Linear transformation-based anisotropic yield functions. Int J Plast 21(5):1009–103910.1016/j.ijplas.2004.06.004 ↗
7. Basu S, Benzerga A (2015) On the path-dependence of the fracture locus in ductile materials: experiments. Int J Solids Struct 71:79–9010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.06.003 ↗
8. Besson J (2009) Damage of ductile materials deforming under multiple plastic or viscoplastic mechanisms. Int J Plast 25:2204–222110.1016/j.ijplas.2009.03.001 ↗
9. Besson J, Guillemer-Neel C (2003) An extension of the Green and Gurson models to kinematic hardening. Mech Mater 35:1–1810.1016/S0167-6636(02)00169-2 ↗
10. Besson J, Steglich D, Brocks W (2001) Modeling of crack growth in round bars and plane strain specimens. Int J Solids Struct 38(46–47):8259–828410.1016/S0020-7683(01)00167-6 ↗
11. Bron F, Besson J (2004) A yield function for anisotropic materials. Application to aluminium alloys. Int J Plast 20:937–96310.1016/j.ijplas.2003.06.001 ↗
12. Chae D, Bandstra J, Koss D (2000) The effect of pre-strain and strain-path changes on ductile fracture: experiment and computational modeling. Mater Sci Eng A A285:165–17110.1016/S0921-5093(00)00642-0 ↗
13. Eikrem PA, Zhang Z, Nyhus B (2007) Effect of plastic prestrain on the crack tip constraint of pipeline steels. Int J Press Vessels Piping 84(12):708–71510.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.08.007 ↗
14. Eikrem P, Zhang Z, Østby E, Nyhus B (2008) Numerical study on the effect of prestrain history on ductile fracture resistance by using the complete Gurson model. Eng Fract Mech 75:4568–458210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.05.006 ↗
15. El-Fadaly M, El-Sarrage T, Eleiche A, Dahl W (1995) Fracture toughness of 20MnMoNi55 steel at different temperatures as affected by room-temperature pre-deformation. J Mater Process Technol 54:159–16510.1016/0924-0136(95)01936-7 ↗
16. Enami K (2005a) Ductile crack initiation behavior in steels with compressive prestrain. J Mar Sci Technol 10:10–4110.1007/s00773-004-0187-5 ↗
17. Enami K (2005b) The effects of compressive and tensile prestrain on ductile fracture initiation in steels. Eng Fract Mech 72(7):1089–110510.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.07.012 ↗
18. Faleskog J, Gao X, Shih C (1998) Cell model for nonlinear fracture analysis—I. Micromechanics calibration. Int J Fract 89:355–37310.1023/A:1007421420901 ↗
19. Hill R (1950) The mathematical theory of plasticity. Clarendon Press, Oxford
20. Hughes T (1980) Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and non linear media. Int J Numer Methods Eng 15:1413–141810.1002/nme.1620150914 ↗
21. Kamaya M (2012) A stress-based criterion for ductile crack initiation of pre-strained carbon steel. Eng Fract Mech 96:461–47910.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.08.020 ↗
22. Karafillis A, Boyce M (1993) A general anisotropic yield criterion using bounds and a transformation weighting tensor. J Mech Phys Solids 41:1859–188610.1016/0022-5096(93)90073-O ↗
23. Koplik J, Needleman A (1988) Void growth and coalescence in porous plastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 24(8):835–85310.1016/0020-7683(88)90051-0 ↗
24. Lillig D (2008) The first (2007) ISOPE strain-based design symposium—a review. In: Proc. 18th international offshore and polar engineering (ISOPE) conference, Vancouver 6-11 July 2008
25. Liu Y, Murakami S, Kanagawa Y (1994) Mesh-dependence and stress singularity in finite element analysis of creep crack growth by continuum damage mechanics approach. Eur J Mech A 13A(3):395–417
26. Mackenzie A, Hancock J, Brown D (1977) On the influence of state of stress on ductile failure initiation in high strength steels. Eng Fract Mech 9:167–18810.1016/0013-7944(77)90062-5 ↗
27. Mear M, Hutchinson J (1985) Influence of yield surface curvature on flow localization in dilatant plasticity. Mech Mater 4:395–40710.1016/0167-6636(85)90035-3 ↗
28. Morgeneyer T, Besson J, Proudhon H, Starink M, Sinclair I (2009) Experimental and numerical analysis of toughness anisotropy in AA2139 al alloy sheet. Acta Mater 57(13):3902–391510.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.046 ↗
29. Morin L, Michel J-C, Leblond J-B (2017) A Gurson-type layer model for ductile porous solids with isotropic and kinematic hardening. Int J Solids Struct 118:167–17810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.03.028 ↗
30. Pardoen T, Hutchinson J (2000) An extended model for void growth and coalescence. J Mech Phys Solids 48(12):2467–251210.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3 ↗
31. Rivalin F, Besson J, Pineau A, Di Fant M (2000) Ductile tearing of pipeline-steel wide plates—II: modeling of in-plane crack propagation. Eng Fract Mech 68(3):347–36410.1016/S0013-7944(00)00108-9 ↗
32. Rousselier G (1987) Ductile fracture models and their potential in local approach of fracture. Nucl Eng Des 105:97–11110.1016/0029-5493(87)90234-2 ↗
33. Shinohara Y, Tsuru E, Asahi H, Hara T, Terada Y, Doi N, Ayukawa N, Murata M (2008) Development of high-strength steel line pipe for SBD applications. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 18(3):220–225
34. Shinohara Y, Madi Y, Besson J (2010) A combined phenomenological model for the representation of anisotropic hardening behavior in high strength steel line pipes. Eur J Mech A 29(6):917–92710.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.06.003 ↗
35. Shinohara Y, Besson J, Madi Y (2012) Anisotropic damage behavior in high-strength line pipe steels. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 22(1):83–89
36. Shinohara Y, Madi Y, Besson J (2016) Anisotropic ductile failure of a high-strength line pipe steel. Int J Fract 197:127–14510.1007/s10704-015-0054-x ↗
37. Sivaprasad S, Tarafder S, Ranganath V, Ray K (2000) Effect of prestrain on fracture toughness of HSLA steels. Mater Sci Eng A 284:195–20110.1016/S0921-5093(00)00739-5 ↗
38. Song W, Liu X, Berto F, Xu J, Fang H (2017) Numerical simulation of prestrain history effect on ductile crack growth in mismatched welded joints. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 40(9):1472–148310.1111/ffe.12590 ↗
39. Tanguy B, Luu T, Perrin G, Pineau A (2008) Plastic and damage behavior of a high strength X100 pipeline steel: experiments and modelling. Int J Press Vessels Piping 85(5):322–33510.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.11.001 ↗
40. Thomas N, Basu S, Benzerga A (2016) On fracture loci of ductile materials under non-proportional loading. Int J Mech Sci 117:135–15110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.08.007 ↗
41. Thomason PF (1985a) A three-dimensional model for ductile fracture by the growth and coalescence of microvoids. Acta Metall 33(6):1087–109510.1016/0001-6160(85)90202-0 ↗
42. Thomason PF (1985b) Three-dimensional models for the plastic limit-loads at incipient failure of the intervoid matrix in ductile porous solids. Acta Metall 33(6):1079–108510.1016/0001-6160(85)90201-9 ↗
43. Tkaczyk T, O’Dowd N, Nikbin K (2011) The effect of prestrain on ductile fracture toughness of reeled pipeline steels. J. Press Vessel Technol 13310.1115/1.4002280 ↗
44. Tsuru E, Shinohara Y, Asahi H (2008) Evaluation precept for buckling resistance of high-strength UOE line pipes used in strain based design SBD applications. Int J Offshore Polar Eng 18(3):176–182
45. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1984) Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall 32:157–16910.1016/0001-6160(84)90213-X ↗
46. Yoo J-Y, Ahn S-S, Seo D-H, Song W-H, Kang K-B (2011) New development of high grade X80 to X120 pipeline steels. Mater Manuf Process 26(1):154–16010.1080/10426910903202534 ↗
47. Zhang Z, Skallerud B (2010) Void coalescence with and without prestrain history. Int J Damage Mech 19:153–17410.1177/1056789508101919 ↗
48. Zhang S, Leotoing L, Guines D, Thuillier S, Zang S (2014) Calibration of anisotropic yield criterion with conventional tests or biaxial test. Int J Mech Sci 85:142–15110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.05.020 ↗