journal article·2015-05Open access

Meshing strategies for the alleviation of mesh-induced effects in cohesive element models

J. J. Rimoli, J. J. Rojas

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 193· Issue 1

Abstract

One of the main approaches for modeling fracture and crack propagation in solid materials is adaptive insertion of cohesive elements, in which line-like (2D) or surface-like (3D) elements are inserted into the finite element mesh to model the nucleation and propagation of failure surfaces. In this approach, however, cracks are forced to propagate along element boundaries, following paths that in general require more energy per unit crack extension (greater driving forces) than those followed in the original continuum, which in turn leads to erroneous solutions. In this work we illustrate how the introduction of a discretization produces two undesired effects, which we term mesh-induced anisotropy and mesh-induced toughness. Subsequently, we analyze those effects through polar plots of the path deviation ratio (a measure of the ability of a mesh to represent straight lines) for commonly adopted meshes. Finally, we propose to reduce those effects through K-means meshes and through a new type of mesh, which we term conjugate-directions mesh. The behavior of all meshes under consideration as the mesh size is reduced is analyzed through a numerical study of convergence.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–12910.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2 ↗
2. Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modelling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33:2899–293810.1016/0020-7683(95)00255-3 ↗
3. Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1(1):269–27110.1007/BF01386390 ↗
4. Du Q, Faber V, Gunzburger M (1999) Centroidal Voronoi tessellations: applications and algorithms. SIAM Rev 41:637–67610.1137/S0036144599352836 ↗
5. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8(2):100–10410.1016/0022-5096(60)90013-2 ↗
6. Leon SE, Spring DW, Paulino GH (2014) Reduction in mesh bias for dynamic fracture using adaptive splitting of polygonal finite elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 100(8):555–57610.1002/nme.4744 ↗
7. Moes N, Belytschko T (2002) Extended finite element method for cohesive crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 69:813–83310.1016/S0013-7944(01)00128-X ↗
8. Noels L, Radovizky R (2008) An explicit discontinuous Galerkin method for non-linear solid dynamics: formulation, parallel implementation and scalability properties. Int J Numer Methods Eng 74:1393–142010.1002/nme.2213 ↗
9. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(9):1267–128210.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
10. Papoulia KD, Vavasis SA, Ganguly P (2006) Spatial convergence of crack nucleation using a cohesive finite-element model on a pinwheel-based mesh. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67:1–1610.1002/nme.1598 ↗
11. Paulino GH, Park K, Celes W, Espinha R (2010) Adaptive dynamic cohesive fracture simulation using nodal perturbation and edge-swap operators. Int J Numer Methods Eng 84(11):1303–134310.1002/nme.2943 ↗
12. Radin C, Sadun L (1996) The isoperimetric problem for pinwheel tilings. Commun Math Phys 177(1):255–26310.1007/BF02102438 ↗
13. Radovizky R, Seagraves A, Tupek MR, Noels L (2011) A scalable 3D fracture and fragmentation algorithm based on a hybrid, discontinuous galerkin, cohesive element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:326–34410.1016/j.cma.2010.08.014 ↗
14. Rice JR (1968) Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture. Fract Adv Treatise 2:191–311
15. Rimoli JJ, Ortiz M (2011) A duality-based method for generating geometric representations of polycrystals. Int J Numer Methods Eng 86(9):1069–108110.1002/nme.3090 ↗
16. Seagraves A, Radovitzky R (2009) Advances in cohesive zone modeling of dynamic fracture. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-1-4419-0446-1_12 ↗
17. Spring DW, Leon SE, Paulino GH (2014) Unstructured polygonal meshes with adaptive refinement for the numerical simulation of dynamic cohesive fracture. Int J Fract 189:33–5710.1007/s10704-014-9961-5 ↗
18. Sukumar N, Moes N, Moran B, Belytschko T (2000) Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48:1549–157010.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549::AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
19. Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42:1397–139710.1016/0022-5096(94)90003-5 ↗
20. Xu XP, Needleman A (1995) Numerical simulations of dynamic crack growth along an interface. Int J Fract 74:289–324