Efficient numerical-control simulation for multi-axis machining based on three-level grids
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Lasemi A, Xue D, Gu P (2010) Recent development in CNC machining of freeform surfaces: a state-of-the-art review. Comput-Aided Des 42(7):641–65410.1016/j.cad.2010.04.002 ↗
2. Sonthipermpoon K, Bohez E, Hasemann H et al (2010) The vibration behavior of impeller blades in the five-axis CNC flank milling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(9):1171–117710.1007/s00170-009-2182-9 ↗
3. Li ZL, Zhu LM (2014) Envelope surface modeling and tool path optimization for five-axis flank milling considering cutter runout. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(4):041021. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.402741510.1115/1.4027415 ↗
4. Song Z, Wang L, Tao W et al (2018) The mechanism of curvature for complex surfaces during five-axis flank milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(5):1665–167610.1007/s00170-016-9783-x ↗
5. Ko JH, Yun WS, Cho DW et al (2002) Development of a virtual machining system, part 1: approximation of the size effect for cutting force prediction. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(15):1595–160510.1016/S0890-6955(02)00137-2 ↗
6. Yun WS, Ko JH, Cho DW et al (2002) Development of a virtual machining system, part 2: prediction and analysis of a machined surface error. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(15):1607–161510.1016/S0890-6955(02)00138-4 ↗
7. Merdol SD, Altintas Y (2008) Virtual cutting and optimization of three-axis milling processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(10):1063–107110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.03.004 ↗
8. OuYang D, Feng HY, Van Nest BA et al (2009) Effective gouge-free tool selection for free-form surface machining. Comput-Aided Des Appl 6(6):839–84910.3722/cadaps.2009.839-849 ↗
9. Du J, Yan X, Tian X (2012) The avoidance of cutter gouging in five-axis machining with a fillet-end milling cutter. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(1):89–9710.1007/s00170-011-3779-3 ↗
10. Spence AD, Altintas Y (1994) A solid modeller based milling process simulation and planning system. J Manuf Sci Eng 116(1):61–69
11. El-Mounayri H, Elbestawi MA, Spence AD et al (1997) General geometric modelling approach for machining process simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(4):237–24710.1007/BF01179605 ↗
12. Spence AD, Abrari F, Elbestawi MA (2000) Integrated solid modeller based solutions for machining. Comput-Aided Des 32(8/9):553–56810.1016/S0010-4485(00)00042-7 ↗
13. Imani BM, Elbestawi MA (2001) Geometric simulation of ball-end milling operations. J Manuf Sci Eng 123(2):177–18410.1115/1.1347034 ↗
14. Anderson RO (1978) Detecting and eliminating collisions in NC machining. Comput-Aided Des 10(4):231–23710.1016/0010-4485(78)90058-1 ↗
15. Hsu PL, Yang WT (1993) Realtime 3D simulation of 3-axis milling using isometric projection. Comput-Aided Des 25(4):215–22410.1016/0010-4485(93)90052-P ↗
16. Van Hook T (1986) Real-time shaded NC milling display. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques. pp 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/15922.1588710.1145/15922.15887 ↗
17. Fussell BK, Jerard RB, Hemmett JG (2003) Modeling of cutting geometry and forces for 5-axis sculptured surface machining. Comput-Aided Des 35(4):333–34610.1016/S0010-4485(02)00055-6 ↗
18. Zhang L (2011) Process modeling and toolpath optimization for five-axis ball-end milling based on tool motion analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(9):905–91610.1007/s00170-011-3354-y ↗
19. Benouamer MO, Michelucci D (1997) Bridging the gap between CSG and Brep via a triple ray representation. In: Proceedings of the fourth ACM symposium on solid modeling and applications. 14–16 May, Atlanta Georgia, USA, pp 68–7910.1145/267734.267755 ↗
20. Boz Y, Erdim H, Lazoglu I (2015) A comparison of solid model and three-orthogonal dexelfield methods for cutter-workpiece engagement calculations in three- and five-axis virtual milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(5):811–82310.1007/s00170-015-7251-7 ↗
21. Inui M, Huang Y, Onozuka H et al (2020) Geometric simulation of power skiving of internal gear using solid model with triple-dexel representation. Proc Manuf 48:520–527
22. Kaufman A (1987) Efficient algorithms for 3D scan-conversion of parametric curves, surfaces, and volumes. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Gr 21(4):171–17910.1145/37402.37423 ↗
23. Zhang Y, Garcia S, Xu W et al (2018) Efficient voxelization using projected optimal scanline. Graph Models 100:61–7010.1016/j.gmod.2017.06.004 ↗
24. Zhang L, Chen W, Ebert DS et al (2007) Conservative voxelization. Visual Comput 23(9):783–79210.1007/s00371-007-0149-0 ↗
25. Jang D, Kim K, Jung J (2000) Voxel-based virtual multi-axis machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16(10):709–71310.1007/s001700070022 ↗
26. Nie Z, Feng HY (2023) Integrated and efficient cutter-workpiece engagement determination in three-axis milling via voxel modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 128(1):391–40310.1007/s00170-023-11904-1 ↗
27. Joy J, Feng HY (2017) Frame-sliced voxel representation: an accurate and memory-efficient modeling method for workpiece geometry in machining simulation. Comput-Aided Des 88:1–1310.1016/j.cad.2017.03.006 ↗
28. Joy J, Feng HY (2017) Efficient milling part geometry computation via three-step update of frame-sliced voxel representation workpiece model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5):2365–237810.1007/s00170-017-0168-6 ↗
29. Yau HT, Tsou LS (2009) Efficient NC simulation for multi-axis solid machining with a universal APT cutter. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 9(2):021001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.313023110.1115/1.3130231 ↗
30. Lynn R, Contis D, Hossain M et al (2017) Voxel model surface offsetting for computer-aided manufacturing using virtualized high-performance computing. J Manuf Syst 43(2):296–30410.1016/j.jmsy.2016.12.005 ↗
31. Lynn R, Dinar M, Huang N et al (2018) Direct digital subtractive manufacturing of a functional assembly using voxel-based models. J Manuf Sci Eng 140(2):021006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403763110.1115/1.4037631 ↗
32. Hossain MM, Nath C, Tucker TM et al (2018) A graphics processor unit-accelerated freeform surface offsetting method for high-resolution subtractive three-dimensional printing (machining). J Manuf Sci Eng 140(4):041012. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.403859910.1115/1.4038599 ↗
33. Yang Y, Zhang W, Wan M et al (2013) A solid trimming method to extract cutter-workpiece engagement maps for multi-axis milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9):2801–281310.1007/s00170-013-4876-2 ↗
34. Aras E, Albedah A (2014) Extracting cutter/workpiece engagements in five-axis milling using solid modeler. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9):1351–136210.1007/s00170-014-5853-0 ↗
35. Ferry W, Yip-Hoi D (2008) Cutter-workpiece engagement calculations by parallel slicing for five-axis flank milling of jet engine impellers. J Manuf Sci Eng 130(5):051011. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.292744910.1115/1.2927449 ↗
36. Kim GM, Cho PJ, Chu CN (2000) Cutting force prediction of sculptured surface ball-end milling using Z-Map. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(2):277–29110.1016/S0890-6955(99)00040-1 ↗
37. Yousefian O, Balabokhin A, Tarbutton J (2020) Point-by-point prediction of cutting force in 3-axis CNC milling machines through voxel framework in digital manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 31(1):215–22610.1007/s10845-018-1442-7 ↗
38. Lorensen WE, Cline HE (1987) Marching cubes: a high resolution 3D surface reconstruction algorithm. ACM SIGGRAPH Comput Gr 21(4):163–16910.1145/37402.37422 ↗