Lossless compression and recovery of locally dense sparse photomasks for ultraviolet lithography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Photolithography Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Advanced optical system design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Robertson ID, Yourdkhani M, Centellas PJ et al (2018) Rapid energy-efficient manufacturing of polymers and composites via frontal polymerization. Nature 557:223–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0054-x10.1038/s41586-018-0054-x ↗
2. Duff IS, Heroux MA, Pozo R (2002) An overview of the sparse basic linear algebra subprograms: the new standard from the blas technical forum. ACM Trans Math Softw 28:239–267. https://doi.org/10.1145/567806.56781010.1145/567806.567810 ↗
3. Reusken A (2002) Approximation of the determinant of large sparse symmetric positive definite matrices. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 23:799–818. https://doi.org/10.1137/S089547980036869X10.1137/S089547980036869X ↗
4. Reid JK, Scott JA (2006) Reducing the total bandwidth of a sparse unsymmetric matrix. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 28(3):805–821. https://doi.org/10.1137/05062993810.1137/050629938 ↗
5. Karakasis V, Gkountouvas T, Kourtis K et al (2013) An extended compression format for the optimization of sparse matrix-vector multiplication. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 24:1930–1940. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPDS.2012.29010.1109/TPDS.2012.290 ↗
6. Kaya K, Ucar B (2009) Constructing elimination trees for sparse unsymmetric matrices. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 34(2):345–354. https://doi.org/10.1137/11082544310.1137/110825443 ↗
7. Koza Z, Matyka M, Szkoda S et al (2014) Compressed multiple-row storage format for sparse matrices on graphics processing units. SIAM J Sci Comput 36:219–239. https://doi.org/10.1137/12090021610.1137/120900216 ↗
8. Eberhardt R, Hoemmen M (2016) Optimization of block sparse matrix-vector multiplication on shared-memory parallel architectures. In: 2016 IEEE international parallel and distributed processing symposium workshops (IPDPSW), 23‒27 May 2016, Chicago, IL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2016.4210.1109/IPDPSW.2016.42 ↗
9. Suzuki K, Fukaya T, Iwashita T (2023) A novel ILU preconditioning method with a block structure suitable for SIMD vectorization. J Comput Appl Math 419:114687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2022.11468710.1016/j.cam.2022.114687 ↗
10. Wheatman B, Xu H (2018) Packed compressed sparse row: a dynamic graph representation. In: 2018 IEEE high performance extreme computing conference (HPEC), 25‒27 September 2018,Waltham, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/HPEC.2018.854756610.1109/HPEC.2018.8547566 ↗
11. Mofrad MH, Melhem R, Ahmadet Y et al (2019) Efficient distributed graph analytics using triply compressed sparse format. In: 2019 IEEE international conference on cluster computing (CLUSTER), 23‒26 September 2019, Albuquerque, NM, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLUSTER.2019.889100810.1109/CLUSTER.2019.8891008 ↗
12. Brinda T, Dharma D (2021) Enhancing the compression performance in medical images using a novel hex-directional chain code (Hex DCC) representation. Soft Comput 25:5807–5830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05645-010.1007/s00500-021-05645-0 ↗
13. Xu J, Wang L, Gao M et al (2024) Heuristic evaluation for progressive additive manufacturing of industrial bending tubes based on reconfigurable transfer learning. Prog Addit Manuf 9:959–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00495-810.1007/s40964-023-00495-8 ↗
14. Duarte MF, Baraniuk RG (2012) Kronecker compressive sensing. IEEE Trans Image Process 21:494–504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2011.216528910.1109/TIP.2011.2165289 ↗
15. Do TT, Gan L, Nguyen NH et al (2012) Fast and efficient compressive sensing using structurally random matrices. IEEE Trans Signal Process 60:139–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2011.217097710.1109/TSP.2011.2170977 ↗
16. Horng M (2012) Vector quantization using the firefly algorithm for image compression. Expert Syst Appl 39:1078–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.10810.1016/j.eswa.2011.07.108 ↗
17. Dhou K, Cruzen C (2019) An innovative chain coding technique for compression based on the concept of biological reproduction: an agent-based modeling approach. IEEE Internet Things J 6:9308–9315. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.291298410.1109/JIOT.2019.2912984 ↗
18. Hosny KM, Khalid AM, Mohamed ER (2020) Efficient compression of volumetric medical images using Legendre moments and differential evolution. Soft Comput 24:409–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03922-710.1007/s00500-019-03922-7 ↗
19. Hurtik P, Tomasiello S (2019) A review on the application of fuzzy transform in data and image compression. Soft Comput 23:12641–12653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03816-810.1007/s00500-019-03816-8 ↗
20. Tumbleston JR, Shirvanyants D, Ermoshkin N et al (2015) Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Science 347:1349–1352. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa239710.1126/science.aaa2397 ↗
21. Patel DK, Sakhaei AH, Layani M et al (2017) Highly stretchable and UV curable elastomers for digital light processing based 3D printing. Adv Mater 29:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20160600010.1002/adma.201606000 ↗
22. Matthews MJ, Guss G, Drachenberg DR et al (2017) Diode-based additive manufacturing of metals using an optically-addressable light valve. Opt Express 25:11788–11800. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.25.01178810.1364/oe.25.011788 ↗
23. Mu Q, Wang L, Dunn CK et al (2017) Digital light processing 3D printing of conductive complex structures. Addit Manuf 18:74–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.08.01110.1016/j.addma.2017.08.011 ↗
24. Kowsari K, Akbari S, Wang D et al (2018) High-efficiency high-resolution multimaterial fabrication for digital light processing-based three-dimensional printing. 3D Print Addit Manuf 5:185–193. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2018.000410.1089/3dp.2018.0004 ↗
25. Kuang X, Wu J, Chen K et al (2019) Grayscale digital light processing 3D printing for highly functionally graded materials. Sci Adv 5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav579010.1126/sciadv.aav5790 ↗
26. Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM et al (2018) Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat Commun 9:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y10.1038/s41467-018-03759-y ↗
27. Kelly BE, Bhattacharya I, Heidari H et al (2019) Volumetric additive manufacturing via tomographic reconstruction. Science 363:1075–1079. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau711410.1126/science.aau7114 ↗
28. Schmidleithner C, Malferrari S, Palgrave R et al (2019) Application of high resolution DLP stereolithography for fabrication of tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomed Mater 14:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/ab279d10.1088/1748-605X/ab279d ↗
29. Barone S, Neri P, Paoli A et al (2019) Development of a DLP 3D printer for orthodontic applications. Procedia Manuf 38:1017–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.18710.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.187 ↗
30. Hong H, Seo YB, Kim DY et al (2020) Digital light processing 3D printed silk fibroin hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 232:119679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.11967910.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119679 ↗
31. Carreño-Morelli E, Rodriguez-Arbaizar M, Cardoso K et al (2020) 3D printing of titanium parts from titanium hydride powder by solvent jetting on granule beds. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 92:105276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.10527610.1016/j.ijrmhm.2020.105276 ↗
32. Zhang B, Li H, Cheng J et al (2021) Mechanically robust and UV-curable shape-memory polymers for digital light processing based 4D printing. Adv Mater 33:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20210129810.1002/adma.202101298 ↗
33. Rajput M, Mondal P, Yadav P et al (2022) Light-based 3D bioprinting of bone tissue scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties and architecture from photocurable silk fibroin. Int J Biol Macromol 202:644–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.08110.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.01.081 ↗
34. Toombs JT, Luitz M, Cook CC et al (2022) Volumetric additive manufacturing of silica glass with microscale computed axial lithography. Science 376:308–312. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm645910.1126/science.abm6459 ↗
35. Sanders SN, Schloemer TH, Gangishetty MK et al (2022) Triplet fusion upconversion nanocapsules for volumetric 3D printing. Nature 604:474–478. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04485-810.1038/s41586-022-04485-8 ↗
36. Xu JH, Wang K, Sheng HS et al (2020) Energy efficiency optimization for ecological 3D printing based on adaptive multi-layer customization. J Clean Prod 245:118826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11882610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118826 ↗
37. Xu JH, Gao MY, Gou HW et al (2020) Storage and reconstruction method of sparse matrix for 3D printing based on irregular block compression. Chi J Comput 43:2203–2215. https://doi.org/10.11897/SP.J.1016.2020.0220310.11897/SP.J.1016.2020.02203 ↗
38. Xu JH, Gao MY, Feng XQ et al (2021) Support diminution design for layered manufacturing of manifold surface based on variable orientation tracking. 3D Print Addit Manuf 8:149–167. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2020.020310.1089/3dp.2020.0203 ↗