Stress relaxation behavior and life prediction of 1Cr18Ni9 spring based on PSO-TCN-Attention
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Li J, Wang Y, Chen X et al (2019) Microstructure evolution in stress relaxation behavior of austenite AISI 304 stainless steel spring. Mater Charact 148:266–27110.1016/j.matchar.2018.12.026 ↗
2. Xiao YH, Guo C (2011) Constitutive modelling for high temperature behavior of 1Cr12Ni3Mo2VNbN martensitic steel. Mater Sci Eng A 528:5081–508710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.050 ↗
3. Zeren A, Zeren M (2003) Stress relaxation properties of prestressed steel wires. J Mater Process Technol 141:86–9210.1016/S0924-0136(03)00131-6 ↗
4. You J, Fu R, Liang H et al (2023) A non-Arrhenius model for mechanism consistency checking in accelerated degradation tests. Actuators 12:319. https://doi.org/10.3390/act1208031910.3390/act12080319 ↗
5. Laidler KJ (1984) The development of the Arrhenius equation. J Chem Educ 61:494. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed061p49410.1021/ed061p494 ↗
6. Ronan S, Alshuth T, Jerrams S et al (2007) Long-term stress relaxation prediction for elastomers using the time-temperature superposition method. Mater Des 28:1513–152310.1016/j.matdes.2006.03.009 ↗
7. Eitzen A, Flamm M, Steinweger T et al (2018) On the lifetime prediction of rolling lobe air springs. Eng Fail Anal 94:313–32610.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.08.001 ↗
8. Yuan M, Yuan HJ, Xu RY et al (2018) Reliability sssessment of Spring based on two degradation modeling methods. In: 2018 12th international conference on reliability, maintainability, and safety (ICRMS). IEEE, Shanghai, pp 390–39410.1109/ICRMS.2018.00079 ↗
9. Kong X, Yang J, Hao S (2021) Reliability modeling-based tolerance design and process parameter analysis considering performance degradation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 207:107343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.10734310.1016/j.ress.2020.107343 ↗
10. Gill SPA, McColvin G, Strang A (2014) Stress relaxation of nickel-based superalloy helical springs at high temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 613:117–12910.1016/j.msea.2014.06.080 ↗
11. Nong X, Feng W, Gao J et al (2021) Stress relaxation constitutive relations and finite element analysis of T9A Helical compression Spring. Mater Trans 62:962–96710.2320/matertrans.MT-M2020353 ↗
12. Dong Y, Zhang C, Zhao G et al (2016) Constitutive equation and processing maps of an Al-Mg-Si aluminum alloy: determination and application in simulating extrusion process of complex profiles. Mater Des 92:983–99710.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.113 ↗
13. Xiao JJ, Li DS (2015) Modeling and simulation for the stress relaxation behavior of Ti-6Al-4V at medium temperature. Rare Met Mater Eng 44:1046–105110.1016/S1875-5372(15)30064-3 ↗
14. Xia Y, Shu X, Zhang Q et al (2023) Modified arrhenius constitutive model and simulation verification of 2A12-T4 aluminum alloy during hot compression. J Mater Res Technol 26:1325–134010.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.190 ↗
15. Huang M, Jiang J, Wang Y et al (2023) Comparison and error evaluation of Arrhenius model and typical machine learning algorithms for high-temperature flow stress prediction of GH3536 superalloy. Mater Lett 349:134754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13475410.1016/j.matlet.2023.134754 ↗
16. Adarsh SH, Sampath V (2020) Prediction of high temperature deformation characteristics of an Fe-based shape memory alloy using constitutive and artificial neural network modelling. Mater Today Commun 22:100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.10084110.1016/j.mtcomm.2019.100841 ↗
17. Ren J, Wang R, Feng Y et al (2019) Hot deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of as-quenched 7055 Al alloy fabricated by powder hot extrusion. Mater Charact 156:109833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2019.10983310.1016/j.matchar.2019.109833 ↗
18. Deng CY, Dong SJ, Tan W (2018) Modelling for the flow behavior of a new metastable beta titanium alloy by GA-based Arrhenius equation. Mater Res Express 6:026544. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aaedf710.1088/2053-1591/aaedf7 ↗
19. Zheng Y, Qin C, Lai X et al (2019) A novel capacity estimation method for lithium-ion batteries using fusion estimation of charging curve sections and discrete Arrhenius aging model. Appl Energy 251:113327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.11332710.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113327 ↗
20. Geng G, He Y, Zhang J et al (2023) Short-term power load forecasting based on PSO-optimized VMD-TCN-Attention mechanism. Energies 16:4616. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1612461610.3390/en16124616 ↗
21. Zhang Y, Shang K, Cui Z et al (2023) Research on traffic flow prediction at intersections based on DT-TCN-Attention. Sensors 23:6683. https://doi.org/10.3390/s2315668310.3390/s23156683 ↗
22. Yang S, Lian H, Xu B et al (2023) Application of robust deep learning models to predict mine water inflow: implication for groundwater environment management. Sci Total Environ 871:162056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.16205610.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162056 ↗
23. Chen Q, Liu YB, Ge MF et al (2022) A novel Bayesian-optimization-based adversarial TCN for RUL prediction of bearings. IEEE Sensors J 22:20968–2097710.1109/JSEN.2022.3209894 ↗
24. Xue H, Gui X, Wang G et al (2024) Prediction of gas drainage changes from nitrogen replacement: a study of a TCN deep learning model with integrated attention mechanism. Fuel 357:129797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.12979710.1016/j.fuel.2023.129797 ↗
25. Zhen Y, Fang J, Zhao X et al (2022) Temporal convolution network based on attention mechanism for well production prediction. J Pet Sci Eng 218:111043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.11104310.1016/j.petrol.2022.111043 ↗
26. Wang Y, Hou D, Xu D et al (2023) Prediction of rolling bearing performance degradation based on sae and TCN-attention models. J Mech Sci Technol 37:1567–158310.1007/s12206-023-0301-4 ↗
27. Zhang F, Shen Z, Xu M et al (2023) Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries based on TCN-DCN fusion model combined with IRRS filtering. J Energy Storage 72:108586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.10858610.1016/j.est.2023.108586 ↗
28. Kong X, Du X, Xu Z et al (2023) Predicting solar radiation for space heating with thermal storage system based on temporal convolutional network-attention model. Appl Therm Eng 219:119574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.11957410.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119574 ↗
29. Jain M, Saihjpal V, Singh N et al (2022) An overview of variants and advancements of PSO algorithm. Appl Sci 12:8392. https://doi.org/10.3390/app1217839210.3390/app12178392 ↗
30. Zhou Y, Wan M (2018) Comparison of models of stress relaxation in failure analysis for connectorsunder long-term storage. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng 324:012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/324/1/01206910.1088/1757-899X/324/1/012069 ↗
31. Li H, Zhan L, Huang M et al (2021) Effects of pre-strain and stress level on stress relaxation ageing behaviour of 2195 Al-Li alloy: experimental and constitutive modelling. J Alloys Compd 851:156829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15682910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156829 ↗
32. Moon J, Hossain MB, Chon KH (2021) AR and ARMA model order selection for time-series modeling with image net classification. Signal Process 183:108026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2021.10802610.1016/j.sigpro.2021.108026 ↗