journal article·2018-11

Enhanced multiaxial fatigue criterion that considers stress gradient effects

Niels Saabye Ottosen, Matti Ristinmaa, Reijo Kouhia

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Modification of a fatigue criterion valid for homogeneous multiaxial stress states to account for the beneficial effect of stress gradients is traditionally performed by modifying the stress terms in the fatigue criterion and thereby introducing new parameters that need to be calibrated. Here the stress terms are left unchanged and, instead, the parameters in the fatigue criterion are modified. This modification is performed, in principle, along the lines of Siebel and Stieler and it introduces Neuber’s parameter as the only new parameter; however, as soon as the ultimate strength of the material is known, also Neuber’s parameter is known. Therefore, the methodology introduced implies that no new calibration process is needed. Here a specific fatigue criterion valid for homogeneous multiaxial stress states is enhanced by this procedure and predictions of this simple approach are compared with a broad range of experimental data and good accuracy is achieved. Moreover, the approach adopted can be applied to other fatigue criteria than the one considered here.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Numerical methods in engineering

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Stress gradient effect on crack initiation in fretting using a multiaxial fatigue framework10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.06.004 ↗
2. Intrinsic material length, theory of critical distances and gradient mechanics: analogies and differences in processing linear-elastic crack tip stress fields10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01687.x ↗
3. High cycle fatigue and a finite element analysis10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00886.x ↗
4. The fatigue behaviour of three-dimensional stress concentrations10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.07.006 ↗
5. Fatigue life assessment under a complex multiaxial load history: an approach based on damage mechanics10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01600.x ↗
6. A notch multiaxial-fatigue approach based on damage mechanics10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.02.003 ↗
7. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel
8. Dang Van K, Griveau B, Message O. On a new multiaxial fatigue criterion: theory and applications. Biaxial and multiaxial fatigue EGF 3. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications; 1989. p. 479–98.
9. Stress gradient calculation at notches10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00010-4 ↗
10. Findley WN, Coleman JJ, Hanley BC. Theory for combined bending and torsion with data for SAE 4340 steel. In: International conference on fatigue of metals. London; 1956. p. 150–7.
11. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending10.1115/1.4008327 ↗
12. Universal features of elastic notch-tip stress fields10.1016/0142-1123(87)90069-7 ↗
13. Engineering steels under combined cyclic and static stresses10.1115/1.4010088 ↗
14. Continuum approach for medelling transversely isotropic high-cycle fatigue10.1016/j.euromechsol.2016.06.007 ↗
15. Juvinall · 2006
16. A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials10.1007/s10704-005-1088-2 ↗
17. On the evolution and comparison of multiaxial fatigue criteria
18. Kuhn P, Hardrath HF. An engineering method for estimating notch-size effect in fatigue tests of steel. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Note 2805, USA; 1952.
19. Lee Y-L, Taylor D. Stress-based fatigue analysis and design. In: Lee Y-L, editor. Chapt. 4 in Fatigue testing and analysis. Elsevier Inc.; 2005.10.1016/B978-075067719-6/50005-1 ↗
20. Fatigue limit of ductile metals under multiaxial loading10.1016/S1566-1369(03)80009-2 ↗
21. Formulation of gradient multiaxial fatigue criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.11.014 ↗
22. A general criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue failure10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00673.x ↗
23. Stress-based uniaxial fatigue analysis using methods described in FKM-guideline10.1007/s11668-012-9599-4 ↗
24. Metals Handbook. Properties and selection: irons and steels, vol. 1, nineth ed. Metals Park (OH): ASM; 1978.
25. A non-local theory applied to high cycle multiaxial fatigue10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00527.x ↗
26. Comparison between defects and micro-notches in multiaxial fatigue - The size effect and the gradient effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.09.005 ↗
27. Third progress report on the effect of size of specimen on fatigue strength of three types of steel
28. Neuber H. Theorie der technischen Formzahl, Forschung im Ingenieurswesen, 7 Bd.; 1936. p. 271-4.10.1007/BF02584908 ↗
29. Neuber, H. Kerbspannungslehre. Grundlage für Genaue Spannungslehre. Springer; 1937.10.1007/978-3-662-36565-6 ↗
30. Neuber, H. Theory of notch stresses. Principles for exact stress calculation. Ann Arbor (MI): J.W. Edwards; 1946.
31. Neuber, H. Kerbspannungslehre, Zweite erweiterte Auflage. Springer-Verlag; 1958.10.1007/978-3-642-53069-2 ↗
32. Continuum approach to high-cycle fatigue modeling10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.009 ↗
33. An energy based criterion for high cycle multiaxial fatigue10.1016/S0997-7538(98)80084-3 ↗
34. Papadopoulos IV, Panoskaltsis VP. In: Pineau A, Cailletaud G, Lindley TC, editors. Gradient-dependent multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion, multiaxial fatigue and design, ESIS 21. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications; 1996. p. 349–64.
35. Papadopoulos IV, Panoskaltsis VP. Invariant formulation of a gradient dependent multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion. Eng Fract Mech 1996;55:513–28.10.1016/S0013-7944(96)00047-1 ↗
36. Papadopoulos IV, Davoli P, Gorla C, Filippini M, Bernasconi A. A comparative study of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria for metals. Int J Fatigue 1997;19:219–35.10.1016/S0142-1123(96)00064-3 ↗
37. Peerlings RHJ, de Borst R, Brekelmans WAM, de Vree JHP. Gradient enhanced damage for quasi-brittle materials. Int J Numer Meth Eng 1996;39:3391–403.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961015)39:19<3391::AID-NME7>3.0.CO;2-D ↗
38. Peterson RE. Notch-sensitivity. In: Sines G, Waisman JL, editors. Metal fatigue. McGraw-Hill Book Comp., Inc.; 1959. p. 293–306.
39. The size effect in fatigue of plain and notched steel specimens loaded under reversed direct stress10.1243/PIME_PROC_1951_165_014_02 ↗
40. Pilkey · 2008
41. Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of art10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-3 ↗
42. Schijve J. Fatigue of structures and materials. Springer; 2009.10.1007/978-1-4020-6808-9 ↗
43. A history of fatigue10.1016/0013-7944(95)00178-6 ↗
44. Siebel E, und Pfender M. Weiterentwicklung der Festigkeitsrechnung bei Wechselbeanspruchung. Stahl und Eisen, Bd. 66/67; 1947. p. 318–21.
45. Siebel E, und Stieler M. Ungleichformige Spannungverteilung bei schwingender Beanspruchung, VDI-Z, 97. Bd.; 1955. p. 121–6.
46. Sines G. Behavior of metals under complex static and alternating stresses. In: Sines G, Waisman JL, editors. Metal fatigue. McGraw-Hill Book Comp., Inc.; 1959. p. 145–69.
47. The theory of critical distances; a review of its applications in fatigue10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.004 ↗
48. A critical/plane method to estimate finite life of notched components under variable amplitude uniaxial/multiaxial fatigue loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.11.015 ↗
49. The theory of critical distances10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.04.007 ↗
50. Thum A, und Buchmann W. Dauerfestigkeit und Konstruktion, Mitteilungen der Materialprüfungsanstalt an der Technischen Hochschule Darmstadt. Heft 1 (Berlin): VDI-Verlag; 1932.
51. An implicit gradient application to fatigue of sharp notches and weldments10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.06.009 ↗
52. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
53. On the fatigue notch factor, Kf10.1016/0142-1123(95)93538-D ↗
54. Multi-axial fatigue criteria with length scale and gradient effects10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.624 ↗