Crack closure and fatigue crack growth near threshold of a metastable austenitic stainless steel
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper R-ratio effects on fatigue crack growth near threshold region of a metastable austenitic stainless steel (MASS) in two different conditions, i.e. annealed and cold rolled, is investigated. The authors present two approaches to correlate FCGR data for R = 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and K-max = 23 MPa root m using a two-parameters approach (Delta K, K-max and alpha in Kujawski's model) and crack closure model (using Elber's K-op, and in Donald's ACRn2 approaches). The K-op and ACRn2 were experimentally measured on a single edge tension specimens. The K-op measurements were performed using a modified method and based on ASTM standards. While the two driving force approaches correlate data well in the Paris region, they fail to correlate them in the threshold region. However, this correlation can be improved in the threshold region when a different alpha value from the Paris region is used. The authors indicated that two different mechanisms operate; one in the Paris region and another in the near threshold. Hence, they proposed to combine the two-parameter and crack closure approaches where Delta K is replaced by Delta K-eff (estimated by a new method proposed in this paper), which is shown to correlate the FCGR data for different stress ratios for annealed steel. The correlation for cold rolled condition shows improvement with the new approach but is not as good as for the annealed one. The author further suggests to modify K-max in the two-parameter approach. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Constitutive modeling of metastable austenitic stainless steel10.1007/s12289-009-0478-9 ↗
2. Constitutive modeling of TRIP steel and its application to the improvement of mechanical properties10.1016/0020-7403(95)00039-Z ↗
3. A constitutive model for transformation plasticity accompanying strain-induced martensitic transformations in metastable austenitic steels10.1016/0956-7151(92)90114-T ↗
4. Anisotropic plasticity model coupled with Lode angle dependent strain-induced transformation kinetics law10.1016/j.jmps.2012.06.009 ↗
5. Effect of stress triaxiality and Lode angle on the kinetics of strain-induced austenite-to-martensite transformation10.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.040 ↗
6. Formation of shear bands and strain-induced martensite during plastic deformation of metastable austenitic stainless steels10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.015 ↗
7. Lange TW, Crookerand EA. How yield strength and fracture toughness considerations can influence fatigue design procedures for structural steels; 1970.
8. The effect of prestrain and bake hardening on the low-cycle fatigue properties of TRIP steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.06.002 ↗
9. Fracture and damage mechanics modelling of thin-walled structures–an overview10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.10.005 ↗
10. Influence of strain-induced martensitic transformations on fatigue crack growth rates in stainless steels10.1007/BF02644322 ↗
11. Influence of deformation-induced martensite on fatigue crack propagation in 304-type steels10.1007/BF02647310 ↗
12. Fatigue of annealed and cold worked stable and unstable stainless steels10.1007/BF02662374 ↗
13. Load history effect on FCGR behaviour of 304LN stainless steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.06.003 ↗
14. Near thershold fatigue crack Growth behavior for 316 stainless Steel10.1520/JTE11029J ↗
15. Martelo DF, Mateo AM, Chapetti MD. unpublished results.
16. David F. Martelo, Fatiga y Fractura de Aceros Austeníticos Metaestables, Doctoral dissertation. Universidad Nacional de Mar Del Plata; 2013.
17. Suresh S. Fatigue of Materials. s.l. Cambridge University Press; 1998, doi: 10.1002/adma.19930050420.10.1002/adma.19930050420 ↗
18. Hedström Peter. Deformation induced martensitic transformation of metastable stainless steel AISI 301. Doctoral dissertation. Luleå University of Technology; 2005.
19. Beese Allison M. Experimental investigation and constitutive modeling of the large deformation behavior of anisotropic steel sheets undergoing strain-induced phase transformation. Doctoral dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2011.
20. Talonen J. Effect of strain-induced α’- martensite Trasnformation on Mechanical Properties of Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steels. Doctoral dissertation. Helsinki University of Technology; 2007.
21. Tada Hiroshi, Paris PC, IRWIN GR. The stress analysis of cracks handbook ASME. New York; 2000. p. 55–56.10.1115/1.801535 ↗
22. E647-08E01, standard Test Method for Measurement of fatigue Crcak Growth Rates. Annual Book of ASTM Standards ASTM. Philadelphia, PA : s.n.; 2010.
23. Elber W. The significance of fatigue crack closure. ASTM STP 486. Damage tolerance in aircraft structures; 1971. p. 230–242.10.1520/STP26680S ↗
24. Service load fatigue damage—a historical perspective10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-7 ↗
25. A new (ΔK, Kmax) driving force parameter for crack growth in aluminum alloys10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00023-8 ↗
26. Fatigue crack growth from sharp notches10.1016/0142-1123(85)90038-6 ↗
27. On the variation of fatigue-crack-opening load with measurement location10.1007/BF02324983 ↗
28. Analyses of the fatigue crack propagation process and stress ratio effects using the two parameter method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.010 ↗
29. BRAY GH, Donald KJ. Separating the influence of Kmax from closure-related stress ratio effects using the adjusted compliance ratio tecnique. ASTM STP 1343, Advances in Fatigue Crack Closure Measurement and Analysis; 1999. p. 57–78.10.1520/STP15750S ↗
30. A fatigue crack growth model with load ratio effects10.1016/0013-7944(87)90182-2 ↗
31. Reconsideration of fatigue crack closure10.1016/0956-716X(92)90164-A ↗
32. Two critical stress intensities for threshold fatigue crack propagation10.1016/0956-716X(93)90538-4 ↗
33. Classification of fatigue crack growth behavior10.1007/BF02670617 ↗
34. Crack closure and the fatigue-crack propagation threshold as a function of load ratio10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00069.x ↗
35. A review of crack closure, fatigue crack threshold and related phenomena10.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-4 ↗
36. Threshold and effective threshold of fatigue crack propagation in ARMCO iron I: the influence of grain size and cold working10.1016/0921-5093(91)90671-9 ↗
37. Nakajima K, Yokoe M, Miyata T. The effect of Microstructure and prestrain on fatigue crack propagation of dual phase steels. p. 1541–1548.
38. Crack paths, microstructure, and fatigue crack growth in annealed and cold-rolled AISI 304 stainless steels10.1007/BF02660877 ↗
39. Crack tip driving forces and crack growth representation under fatigue10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00105-1 ↗
40. An experimental investigation of fatigue crack growth of stainless steel 304L10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.004 ↗
41. Crack deflection: implications for the growth of long and short fatigue cracks10.1007/BF02663313 ↗
42. A two parameter driving force for fatigue crack growth analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.002 ↗