A methodology to determine a conditional probability density distribution surface from S–N data
Source abstract
Abstract
A conditional probability density distribution surface (CPDDS) is constructed by two functions in this paper. One is the function of population mean and the stress level; the other is the function of standard deviation and the stress level. The surface represents the probability density curve of fatigue life changing with the stress level. A new definition of fatigue limit as well as the determination method is given in this paper according to the small probability event of CPDDS. The proposed method can save considerable cost and time in the determination of fatigue limit.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Statistical aspects of fatigue life and endurance limit10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01445.x ↗
2. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction using AFGROW and accounting for material variability10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.001 ↗
3. Modeling lifetime data with application to fatigue models10.1080/01621459.1995.10476606 ↗
4. On fitting a fatigue model to data10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00048-6 ↗
5. ASTM. Statistical analysis of fatigue data, ASTM STP 744. In: Little, RE, Ekvall, JC. editors. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1981.
6. On stochastic evaluation of S–N data based on fatigue strength distribution10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.001 ↗
7. A new approach to fatigue-strength distribution for fatigue reliability evaluation10.1016/0142-1123(95)95886-L ↗
8. Prediction of fatigue life distribution of marine propeller materials10.1007/s12206-009-0112-2 ↗
9. Statistical fatigue properties of SCM435 steel in ultra-long-life regime based on JSMS database on fatigue strength of metallic materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.09.018 ↗
10. Fatigue life evaluation of grey cast iron machine components under variable amplitude loading
11. There is no infinite fatigue life in metallic materials10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00183.x ↗
12. ASTM standard E1823-10a, standard terminology relating to fatigue and fracture testing[S]. In: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA; 2010. doi:10.1520/ E1823-10A. .
13. Course of SN-curves especially in the high-cycle fatigue regime with regard to component design and safety10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.015 ↗
14. Very high cycle fatigue – is there a fatigue limit?10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.009 ↗
15. The exponential law of endurance tests
16. International standard. Metallic materials – fatigue testing – statistical planning and analysis of data. ISO 12107; 2003.
17. International standard. metallic materials – fatigue testing – axial force-controlled method. ISO 1099; 2006.
18. Zhentong · 2000
19. The small probability events in the daily life
20. Beer · 1992
21. The frequency distribution and eigenfunction of the fatigue strength
22. An improved neural computing method for describing the scatter of S–N curves10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.018 ↗
23. Weibull · 1961
24. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254 ↗
25. A rapid method for generation of a haigh diagram for high cycle fatigue
26. Prot M. Matériaux [fatigue tests under progressive load a new technique for testing materials] Rev Métall 1948;45(12):481–89. English translation: Wright Air Development Center Tech. Report No. 52-148, September; 1952 [Italian Abstract: Metallurg Ital 1949;41(4):211–12].10.1051/metal/194845120481 ↗
27. Strength, damping and elasticity of materials under increasing reversed stress with reference to accelerated fatigue testing
28. Boresi · 1953
29. Boresi · 1955
30. An appraisal of the prot accelerated fatigue test
31. A simulation-based investigation of the staircase method for fatigue strength testing10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.12.005 ↗
32. A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001 ↗