journal article·2005-06

Fatigue evaluation of surface coated railway rails using shakedown theory, finite element calculations, and lab and field trials

Jonas W. Ringsberg, Francis J. Franklin, B Lennart Josefson, Ajay Kapoor, Jens C.O. Nielsen

International Journal of Fatigue· Volume 27· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract One solution to prevent surface fatigue of rails, investigated by the European project INFRA-STAR, is to coat the surfaces with a material which reduces or eliminates ratchetting. In this investigation, a systematic approach for fatigue design of surface coated rails (called two-material rails) against rolling contact fatigue is presented. It incorporates dynamic train–track interaction simulations, three-dimensional finite element (FE) calculations, shakedown theory, and lab and field trials. The approach was validated against two-dimensional twin-disc tests in laboratory, where surface coated disc specimens were used. Next, heavy haul traffic field trials were performed using two-material rails. Dynamic train–track interaction simulations, for train traffic situations at the test site, were performed. The results from these simulations were contact load data, which were used in the fatigue design approach to calculate railhead stresses with a three-dimensional FE model of a piece of rail; 26 load cases were identified as critical with respect to rolling contact fatigue. The stresses from the FE calculations were used to calculate shakedown diagrams for various wheel–rail contact situations at the test site. The shakedown diagrams and calculations are used to illustrate how the improvement in shakedown performance of coated rails varies with the coating thickness, traction coefficient, contact load position, the strength of the coating and substrate materials, and strain hardening of the materials. It is shown that the two-material rails with the correct rail profile can be used to prevent rolling contact fatigue and reduce wear for the current train traffic situation. The results are discussed in the light of observations at the test site.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Prevention of RCF damage in curved track through development of the INFRA-STAR two-material rail10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00663.x ↗
2. Hiensch EJM, Larsson PO, Nilsson O, Levy D, Kapoor A, Franklin FJ, et al. Two-material rail development: field test results regarding rolling contact fatigue and squeal noise behaviour. In: Ekberg A, Kabo E, Ringsberg JW, editors. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems—CM2003, Göteborg, Sweden. Göteborg, Sweden: Vasastadens Bokbinderi AB; 2003. p. 39–47 [Wear, in press].
3. Shakedown limits in three-dimensional wheel–rail rolling–sliding contacts
4. The cyclic properties of engineering materials10.1016/0956-7151(94)90493-6 ↗
5. A re-evaluation of the life to rupture of ductile metals by cyclic plastic strain10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00801.x ↗
6. Finite element analyses of rolling contact fatigue crack initiation in railheads10.1243/0954409011531558 ↗
7. Wear by plastic ratchetting10.1016/S0043-1648(97)00083-5 ↗
8. Elasto-plastic finite element analysis of repeated two-dimensional rolling sliding contacts10.1115/1.3261573 ↗
9. Elasto-plastic finite element analysis of three-dimensional pure rolling contact above the shakedown limit10.1115/1.2897192 ↗
10. Application of the kinematical shakedown theorem to rolling and sliding contact point10.1016/0022-5096(85)90033-X ↗
11. Plastic flow and shakedown of the rail surface in repeated wheel–rail contact10.1016/0043-1648(91)90003-D ↗
12. The application of shakedown principles in rolling and sliding contact
13. The effect of surface hardening on the elastic shakedown of elliptical contacts10.1243/1350650991542677 ↗
14. Shakedown limits in sliding contacts on a surface hardened half-space10.1016/0043-1648(94)90288-7 ↗
15. Shakedown limits on coated and engineered surfaces10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07388-7 ↗
16. Cyclic hardening properties of hard-drawn copper and rail steel10.1016/0022-5096(89)90024-0 ↗
17. Franklin FJ, Weeda GJ, Kapoor A, Hiensch EJM. Rolling contact fatigue and wear behaviour of the INFRA-STAR two-material rail. In: Ekberg A, Kabo E, Ringsberg JW, editors. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems—CM2003, Göteborg, Sweden. Göteborg, Sweden: Vasastadens Bokbinderi AB; 2003. p. 559–65 [Wear, in press].
18. Development of a machine for closely controlled rolling contact fatigue and wear testing10.1520/JTE12104J ↗
19. Niederhauser S, Karlsson B. Comparison of fatigue behaviour of Co–Cr laser cladded steel plates for railway applications. In: Ekberg A, Kabo E, Ringsberg JW, editors. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems—CM2003, Göteborg, Sweden. Göteborg, Sweden: Vasastadens Bokbinderi AB; 2003. p. 567–72 [Wear, in press].
20. DE-solver, A.B. GENSYS user's manual, release 0103. Sweden; Östersund: 2001.
21. Hibbitt, Karlsson, Sorensen. ABAQUS/Theory Manual, Version 6.2-5. Pawtucket, RI, USA: Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen, Inc.; 2001.
22. Ringsberg JW, Skyttebol A, Josefson BL. Investigation of the rolling contact fatigue resistance of laser cladded twin-disc specimens: FE simulation of laser cladding, grinding and a twin-disc test. Int J Fatigue, in press [doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.006].10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.10.006 ↗
23. Skyttebol A, Josefson BL, Ringsberg JW. Fatigue crack growth in a welded rail under the influence of residual stresses, Eng Fract Mech 2005; 72: 271–85.10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.04.009 ↗
24. Kapoor A, Fletcher DI. Project JR 31.086 Report. The effect of residual stress on contact stress driven crack growth in rail. Part 1: the model; May 2003 [submitted by The University of Sheffield to Health and Safety Laboratory].