Multi-axial fatigue analysis of aluminothermic rail welds under high axle load conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fatigue crack initiation analysis is performed at the edge of the weld collar of an aluminothermic weld, in order to examine one of the failure modes that occur in this weld type under high axle load conditions. Since the stress state is multi-axial and the stress history involves rotating principal stresses, a shear based multi-axial fatigue criterion based on the concept of critical plane is exploited. It is believed that the material distress as a result of wheel–rail contact, bending, residual and seasonally-dependent thermal stresses, as well as the geometrical features associated with the weld collar, would directly influence the location of fatigue crack initiation and the severity of damage. The fatigue assessment is performed using thermo-structural finite element analysis followed by the Dang Van multi-axial fatigue criterion implemented as a customized computer code. The method is applied to investigate the effect of operational parameters including the conditions of vehicle hunting or curving, residual stress, seasonally-dependent variations in rail temperature, and deficiencies in track support conditions in the vicinity of aluminothermic welds. The finite element simulation is validated through strain gauge measurements, and the results of fatigue analysis are compared with the locations of fatigue cracking and failure modes that occur in-service.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Failure modes in aluminothermic rail welds under high axle load conditions10.1016/j.engfailanal.2003.05.003 ↗
2. Chen Y, Lawrence FV, Barkan CPL, Dantzig JA. Weld defect formation in rail thermite welds. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers – part F – journal of rail & rapid transit. Professional Engineering Publishing; 2006. p. 373–84.10.1243/0954409JRRT44 ↗
3. Lawrence FV, Ross ET, Barkan CPL. Reliability of improved thermite welds. In: Innovations Deserving Exploratory Analysis programs (IDEA). Transportation Research Board of the National Academics, Washington; 2004.
4. Terashita Y, Tatsumi M. Analysis of damaged rail weld. Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute 44; May, 2003. p. 59–64.10.2219/rtriqr.44.59 ↗
5. Mutton PJ. Horizontal split web fatigue failure of rail welds. In: Failure analysis in materials engineering. Institute of Metals and Materials Australasia (IMMA), Melbourne, Australia; 1994.
6. Mutton PJ, Soeleiman S. Performance of aluminothermic welds under high axle loads. In: 4th International heavy haul railway conference IEAust, Brisbane, Australia; 1989. p. 180–7.
7. AS 1085.1. Railway track materials Part 1: steel rails. Standards Australia; 2002.
8. EN 13674-1. Railway applications – track – rail. European Committee for Standardization; 2011.
9. Manual for railway engineering. Rail, American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association; 2008 [chapter 4].
10. Criterion for high cycle fatigue failure under multiaxial loading, biaxial and multiaxial fatigue, EGF 3
11. On the application of Dang Van criterion to rolling contact fatigue10.1016/j.wear.2005.03.007 ↗
12. A comprehensive approach for modeling fatigue and fracture of rails10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.12.020 ↗
13. Modelling and experiment of railway ballast vibrations10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00186-X ↗
14. Finite element analysis of bonded insulated rail joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.09.003 ↗
15. Damage tolerance analysis of detail fractures in rail10.1016/S0167-8442(97)00035-9 ↗
16. Rolling contact in railways: modelling, simulation and damage prediction10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00698.x ↗
17. A fatigue life model for general rolling contact with application to wheel/rail damage10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00847.x ↗
18. Assessment of uncertainties in life prediction of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in welded rails10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.024 ↗
19. Collins · 1993
20. Relationship between hardness and tensile properties in various single structured steels10.1179/026708301101510339 ↗
21. Callister · 2002
22. The mechanical properties of thermite welds in premium alloy rails10.1016/0025-5416(84)90159-9 ↗
23. Lee YL, Pan J, Hathaway R, Barkey M. Fatigue testing and analysis: theory and practice. Massachusetts: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2004.
24. Murakami · 2002
25. Procter E, Beaney EM. The trepan or ring core method, centre-hole method, Sach’s method, blind hole methods, deep hole technique. In: Advances in surface treatment technology. New York: Permagon Press; 1987. p. 165–98.10.1016/B978-0-08-034062-3.50019-7 ↗
26. Eisenmann J. Stresses acting on the rail – recent findings. Brussels, Belgium: International Railway Congress Association; 1967. p. 537–50.
27. Sugiyama T, Yamazaki T, Umeda S. Measurement of local stress on outer rail head. Quarterly report of RTRI; 1971. p. 11–3.
28. Mutton PJ, Tan M, Bartle P, Kapoor A. The effect of severe head wear on rolling contact fatigue in heavy haul operations. In: 8th International conference on contact mechanics and wear of rail/wheel systems (CM2009), Firenze, Italy; 2009.
29. Fatigue crack growth in a welded rail under the influence of residual stresses10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.04.009 ↗
30. Effect of unsupported sleepers on wheel/rail normal load10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.08.006 ↗
31. Lundqvist A, Dahlberg T. Load impact on railway track due to unsupported sleepers. In: Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers, part F: journal of rail and rapid transit, vol. 219; 2005. p. 67–77.10.1243/095440905X8790 ↗
32. Ishida M, Moto T, Kono A, Jin Y. Influence of loose sleeper on track dynamics and bending fatigue of rail welds. Quarterly report of RTRI, vol. 40; 1999. p. 80–5.10.2219/rtriqr.40.80 ↗