Comparative research on the accumulative damage rules under multiaxial block loading spectrum for 2024-T4 aluminum alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Different multiaxial multi-block loading and random block loading spectra were used to conduct variable amplitude fatigue tests on 2024-T4 aluminum alloy. These spectra were derived from 16 kinds of constant amplitude multiaxial loadings. Five accumulative damage models were introduced and the critical damages given by these models were compared with the experimental results. It is demonstrated that Palmgren–Miner-Law and Shamsaei’s approach both led to good coincidences with the experimental results, Manson’s damage curve approach (DCA) and Morrow’s rule were not suitable for both multiaxial multi-block loading and random block loading spectra, while Carpinteri’s model was inapplicable to 2024-T4 aluminum alloy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Yao · 2003
2. A survey on evaluating the fatigue limit under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.001 ↗
3. Die · Z Ver Dtsch Ing · 1924 · 68 · 339
4. Cumulative damage in fatigue10.1115/1.4009458 ↗
5. Shear strain based multiaxial fatigue parameters applied to variable amplitude loading10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00091-7 ↗
6. Life prediction techniques for variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue-part 1: theories10.1115/1.2806821 ↗
7. Life prediction techniques for variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue-Part 2: comparison with experimental results10.1115/1.2806822 ↗
8. An on-line algorithm of fatigue damage evaluation under multiaxial random loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.08.015 ↗
9. Fatigue lives of 18G2A and 10HNAP steels under variable amplitude and random non-proportional bending with torsion loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.07.001 ↗
10. Estimating fatigue lifetime of steel weldments locally damaged by variable amplitude multiaxial stress fields10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.12.004 ↗
11. Multiaxial fatigue of welded joints under constant and variable amplitude loadings10.1046/j.1460-2695.2001.00393.x ↗
12. Estimating fatigue damage under variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01594.x ↗
13. A critical plane approach based on energy concepts: application to biaxial random tension–compression high-cycle fatigue regime10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00003-1 ↗
14. Sequenced axial and torsional cumulative fatigue: low amplitude followed by high amplitude loading
15. A multiaxial fatigue criterion for various metallic materials under proportional and nonproportional loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.007 ↗
16. Fatigue damage of medium carbon steel under sequential application of axial and torsional loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.2005.00985.x ↗
17. A weight function-critical plane approach for low-cycle fatigue under variable amplitude multiaxial loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01003.x ↗
18. Inoue T, Hoshide T, Yoshikawa Y, Kimura Y. A damage mechanics approach to crack initiation in polycrystalline copper under multiaxial low cycle fatigue. In: Mechanical behaviour of materials Beijing; 1988. p. 651–8.10.1016/B978-0-08-034912-1.50088-6 ↗
19. Cumulative damage behavior of anisotropic Al-6061-T6 as a function of axial–torsional loading mode sequence10.1115/1.2904252 ↗
20. Study on nonlinear continuum multiaxial fatigue cumulative damage model
21. A stress invariant based criterion to estimate fatigue damage under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.006 ↗
22. Sequential law in multiaxial fatigue, a new damage indicator10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.08.005 ↗
23. An equivalent stress process for fatigue life estimation under multiaxial loadings based on a new non linear damage model10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.105 ↗
24. A multiaxial fatigue criterion for random loading10.1046/j.1460-2695.2003.00620.x ↗
25. Structural integrity assessment of metallic components under
26. Multiaxial fatigue of titanium including step loading and load path alteration and sequence effects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.006 ↗
27. Multiaxial fatigue evaluation using discriminating strain paths10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.11.002 ↗
28. Experimental investigation on fatigue damage rule of LY12CZ aluminum alloy under tension-torsion loading
29. Influence of material’s ductility and local deformation mode on multiaxial fatigue response10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.010 ↗
30. Influence of load and deformation-controlled multiaxial tests on fatigue life to crack initiation10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00079-7 ↗
31. Principles of variable amplitude fatigue design and testing10.1520/JAI19018 ↗
32. Cumulative fatigue damage and life prediction theories: a survey of the state of the art for homogeneous materials10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00081-9 ↗
33. Morrow DJ. The effect of selected sub-cycle sequences in fatigue loading histories. In: Random fatigue life predictions; 1986. p. 43–60.
34. A modified model for the estimation of fatigue life derived from random vibration theory10.1016/S0266-8920(98)00008-3 ↗
35. An improved multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion based on critical plane approach10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01523.x ↗
36. The review of ascertainable fatigue cumulative damage rule
37. Robillard M, Cailletaud G. Directionaly defined damage in multiaxial low cycle fatigue: experimental evidence and tentative modelling. In: Proceeding of the third international conference on biaxial/multiaxial fatigue, Stuttgart, vol. 24; 1989. p. 1–24.