journal article·2026-06Open access

From stress field to multiaxial fatigue life: A novel physics-guided neural network framework accounting for stress ratio, phase angle, and biaxiality ratio

Amir Mohammad Mirzaei

Abstract

• Physics-guided NN predicts multiaxial fatigue life from 3 principal-stress fields. • Unified model covers plain and notched specimens without scalar damage indices. • Principal-stress histories in the failure region are discretised in space and time. • Temporal Conv1D backbone learns phase- and path-dependent features from one cycle. Predicting the fatigue life under multiaxial loading is challenging because failure is governed by local stress fields and evolution of the stress state. The central idea of this study is to represent the geometric effect (including plain and notched configurations) by the spatial distributions of the three principal stresses in the potential region of failure, discretised over a set of nodes. Sampling these fields over one load cycle captures the loading history (stress ratio, biaxiality ratio, and phase angle) for constant-amplitude multiaxial loading, without introducing any additional ad hoc or phenomenological scalar damage parameter. To encode this loading history, a lightweight temporal Conv1D encoder is followed by a compact fully-connected regression head. The framework is validated on EN-GJS-600-3 using leave-one-case-out splits over 18 geometry–loading cases spanning multiple geometries, axial, torsional, and multiaxial loading, three stress ratios, two biaxiality ratios, and three phase angles. Across this broad set, the model achieves R 2 = 0.70, while adding the nominal metadata increases the prediction accuracy to R 2 = 0.75. Compared with classical critical-plane benchmarks (SWT and FS), the proposed framework achieves higher accuracy and remains applicable to both plain and notched specimens, whereas critical-plane criteria degrade strongly when plain data are included (due to differences in the dominant failure mechanisms). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness to reasonable choices of spatial and temporal discretisation. Gradient-based saliency illustrates mechanistic insights: spatial attribution concentrates at the notch tip, and temporal attribution is dominated by the first principal-stress, consistent with tensile crack-opening and with SWT, which outperforms the shear-driven FS criterion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Sines · 1959
2. Crossland B. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Third Int. Conf. Fatigue Met., 1956.
3. Van K, Griveau B, On a new multiaxial fatigue limit criterion- Theory and application, Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue(A 90-16739 05-39). London, Mech. Eng. Publ. Ltd., 1989, (1989) 479–496.
4. Critical plane approaches in high-cycle fatigue: on the definition of the amplitude and mean value of the shear stress acting on the critical plane10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00459.x ↗
5. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending10.1115/1.4008327 ↗
6. A Theory for Fatigue failure under Multiaxial Stress-Strain Conditions10.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_161_02 ↗
7. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
8. A stress-strain function for the fatigue of metals
9. others, on multiaxial creep–fatigue considering the non-proportional loading effect: Constitutive modeling, deformation mechanism, and life prediction
10. Multiaxial low cycle fatigue life under non-proportional loading10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.04.021 ↗
11. A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00739.x ↗
12. An improved multiaxial rainflow algorithm for non-proportional stress or strain histories–Part I: Enclosing surface methods10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.014 ↗
13. An improved multiaxial rainflow algorithm for non-proportional stress or strain histories–Part II: the Modified Wang-Brown method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.012 ↗
14. Fatigue properties of metals
15. The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum
16. A multiaxial fatigue criterion including mean10.1520/STP24795S ↗
17. A modification of Morrow and Smith–Watson–Topper mean stress correction models10.1111/j.1460-2695.2011.01577.x ↗
18. A generalized fatigue damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction under proportional and non-proportional loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.10.007 ↗
19. A neural network approach to fatigue life prediction10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.003 ↗
20. A novel method of multiaxial fatigue life prediction based on deep learning10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106356 ↗
21. A novel deep learning approach of multiaxial fatigue life-prediction with a self-attention mechanism characterizing the effects of loading history and varying temperature10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106851 ↗
22. In-situ fatigue prognosis in laminated composites: a machine learning approach using self-temperature rise data10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.112537 ↗
23. Multiaxial fatigue life prediction for various metallic materials based on the hybrid CNN-LSTM neural network10.1111/ffe.13977 ↗
24. An image recognition based multiaxial low-cycle fatigue life prediction method with CNN model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107324 ↗
25. Fatigue life predictor: predicting fatigue life of metallic material using LSTM with a contextual attention model10.1039/D5RA01578B ↗
26. A TCN-based feature fusion framework for multiaxial fatigue life prediction: Bridging loading dynamics and material characteristics10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108915 ↗
27. A fatigue life prediction method based on multi-signal fusion deep attention residual convolutional neural network10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110646 ↗
28. Mirzaei AM, Stress, Strain, or Energy: Which One Is the Superior Parameter to Estimate Fatigue Life of Notched Components? An Answer by a Novel Machine Learning-Based Framework, arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.11859 (2023).10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110401 ↗
29. Stress, strain, or energy? which one is superior predictor of fatigue life in notched Components? A novel Machine Learning-based framework10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110401 ↗
30. Stress, strain, or displacement? a novel machine learning based framework to predict mixed mode I/II fracture load and initiation angle
31. Mirzaei AM. Towards in-situ failure assessment: deep learning on DIC results for laminated composites, Compos Part B Eng (2025).10.1016/j.compositesb.2025.113241 ↗
32. A strain energy density design approach for large cast iron components: from microstructural analysis to multiaxial fatigue response10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107824 ↗
33. Application of the Effective critical plane approach for the fatigue assessment of ductile cast iron under multiaxial and non-proportional loading conditions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108716 ↗
34. Multiaxial plain and notch fatigue strength of thick-walled ductile cast iron EN-GJS-600-3: combining multiaxial fatigue criteria, theory of critical distances, and defect sensitivity10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106703 ↗
35. Influence of casting defects on the fatigue limit of nodular cast iron10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00141-5 ↗
36. Micromechanisms of fracture in nodular cast iron: from experimental findings towards modeling strategies – a review10.1016/j.engfracmech.2015.06.042 ↗
37. High resolution X-ray tomography of short fatigue crack nucleation in austempered ductile cast iron10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.11.001 ↗
38. Multiaxial cyclic deformation and non-proportional hardening employing discriminating load paths10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.02.006 ↗
39. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
40. Suresh · 1998
41. The peak stress method for fatigue strength assessment of welded joints with weld toe or weld root failures10.1007/BF03321304 ↗
42. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition10.1109/5.726791 ↗
43. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 ↗
44. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain10.1037/h0042519 ↗
45. Learning representations by back-propagating errors10.1038/323533a0 ↗
46. Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M, Optuna: A next-generation hyperparameter optimization framework. In: Proc. 25th ACM SIGKDD Int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data Min., 2019: pp. 2623–2631.10.1145/3292500.3330701 ↗
47. A new unified asymptotic stress field solution for blunt and sharp notches subjected to mixed mode loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106176 ↗
48. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Metallic materials — Fatigue testing — Strain-controlled thermomechanical fatigue testing method, 2011. https://www.iso.org/standard/45583.html.