A novel implementation of the cohesive zone model for the fatigue propagation of delamination in composites using a sequential static fatigue algorithm
Source abstract
Abstract
• A new implementation of the SSF algorithm is proposed implementing CZM (C-SSF) • The C-SSF showed an excellent accuracy in predicting delamination under fatigue. • The C-SSF accurately predicted the propagation of large curved delaminations. • The C-SSF showed superior performance than a VCCT based SSF. Composite materials are particularly exposed to delamination under fatigue loading conditions, which can significantly compromise their structural integrity. The ability to accurately and efficiently estimate the progression of delamination under fatigue is crucial for enhancing the safety and reliability of lightweight composite structures. The aim of this paper is to implement the cohesive elements formulation in a Sequential Static Fatigue (SSF) algorithm named C-SSF. The C-SSF algorithm simulates delamination propagation under fatigue loading by conducting a series of sequential static simulations. The accuracy of the C-SSF method is validated by comparing its results with experimental data from two published case studies. The results demonstrate that this approach can effectively simulate delamination growth under fatigue loading. Compared to a similar approach based on the Virtual Crack Closure Technique (VCCT), the C-SSF algorithm provided superior accuracy, especially when large and curved delamination fronts were involved. The C-SSF method proved its capability to simulate propagation of delamination in composite structures, making it a valuable tool for modelling the fatigue behaviour of other similar structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Harris B. Fatigue in Composites: Science and Technology of the Fatigue Response of Fibre-Reinforced Plastics. 2003. 1-742.10.1201/9781439823255.pt1 ↗
2. Simulation of delamination growth at CFRP-tungsten aerospace laminates using VCCT and CZM modelling techniques10.1007/s10443-018-9746-5 ↗
3. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
4. Virtual crack closure technique: History, approach, and applications10.1115/1.1595677 ↗
5. Composite delamination modelling using a multi-layered solid element10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.008 ↗
6. Simulation of mode I delamination propagation in multidirectional composites with R-curve effects using VCCT method10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.06.025 ↗
7. Influence of curved delamination front on toughness of multidirectional DCB specimens10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.035 ↗
8. Methods for the prediction of fatigue delamination growth in composites and adhesive bonds – A critical review10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.10.003 ↗
9. Development of aviation industry-oriented methodology for failure predictions of brittle bonded joints using probabilistic machine learning10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115979 ↗
10. Jamil A. Assessment of the VCCT technique for modelling fatigue crack growth in adhesively bonded composite materials. Politecnico di Milano, Doctoral Thesis, 2014.
11. Giuliese G, Pirondi A, Moroni F, Bernasconi A, Jamil A, Nikbakh A. Fatigue delamination: a comparison between Virtual Crack Closure and Cohesive Zone siulation techniques. 19th Int. Conf. Compos. Mater., Montréal, Canada, Canada: 2013.
12. Fatigue life and damage tolerance of postbuckled composite stiffened structures with initial delamination10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.033 ↗
13. Simulation of delamination in composites under high-cycle fatigue10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.11.009 ↗
14. A benchmark study of simulation methods for high-cycle fatigue-driven delamination based on cohesive zone models10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.11.081 ↗
15. Comparative study of cohesive zone and virtual crack closure techniques for three-dimensional fatigue debonding10.1080/00218464.2013.859616 ↗
16. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: An overview
17. Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues10.1002/nme.93 ↗
18. Using a cohesive damage model to predict the tensile behaviour of CFRP single-strap repairs10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.10.003 ↗
19. Some issues in the application of cohesive zone models for metal–ceramic interfaces10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00149-X ↗
20. Discrete cohesive zone model to simulate static fracture in 2D triaxially braided carbon fiber composites10.1177/0021998306061320 ↗
21. Strength prediction of single- and double-lap joints by standard and extended finite element modelling10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.09.008 ↗
22. Numerical simulation of fatigue-driven delamination using interface elements10.1002/nme.1338 ↗
23. A progressive damage model for the prediction of fatigue crack growth in bonded joints10.1080/00218464.2010.484305 ↗
24. A fatigue degradation law for cohesive interface elements – Development and application to composite materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.04.006 ↗
25. A crack tip tracking algorithm for cohesive interface element analysis of fatigue delamination propagation in composite materials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.03.034 ↗
26. Cohesive zone model for high-cycle fatigue of adhesively bonded joints under mode I loading10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.12.009 ↗
27. A simulation method for high-cycle fatigue-driven delamination using a cohesive zone model10.1002/nme.5117 ↗
28. An improved delamination fatigue cohesive interface model for complex three-dimensional multi-interface cases10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.02.008 ↗
29. Tensile fatigue life prediction of adhesively bonded structures based on CZM technique and a modified degradation approach10.1177/0954410020951675 ↗
30. A modified degradation technique for fatigue life assessment of adhesive materials subjected to cyclic shear loads10.1177/0954406220967684 ↗
31. Interface elements for fatigue-driven delaminations in advanced composite materials
32. Composites fatigue delamination prediction using double load envelopes and twin cohesive models10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105711 ↗
33. Embedding artificial neural networks into twin cohesive zone models for composites fatigue delamination prediction under various stress ratios and mode mixities
34. From S-N to the Paris law with a new mixed-mode cohesive fatigue model for delamination in composites10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102499 ↗
35. An adaptive floating node based formulation for the analysis of multiple delaminations under high cycle fatigue loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107036 ↗
36. Benchmark test for mode I fatigue-driven delamination in GFRP composite laminates: Experimental results and simulation with the inter-laminar damage model implemented in SAMCEF10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110529 ↗
37. A simulation method for fatigue-driven delamination in layered structures involving non-negligible fracture process zones and arbitrarily shaped crack fronts10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.026 ↗
38. A procedure for the simulation of fatigue crack growth in adhesively bonded joints based on the cohesive zone model and different mixed-mode propagation criteria10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.02.004 ↗
39. Modelling the static and fatigue behavior of hybrid spot welded-adhesively bonded single lap joints10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103619 ↗
40. Numerical analysis of the DCB test configuration applicability to mechanically coupled Fiber Reinforced Laminated Composite beams10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.05.060 ↗
41. A robust fatigue parameter determination method for a local fatigue cohesive zone model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107582 ↗
42. Point-wise evaluation of the growth driving direction for arbitrarily shaped delamination fronts using cohesive elements10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.05.006 ↗
43. An evaluation of mode-decomposed energy release rates for arbitrarily shaped delamination fronts using cohesive elements10.1016/j.cma.2018.12.027 ↗
44. Siemens Digital Industries Software. Simcenter Samcef 2021.
45. An efficient and versatile use of the VCCT for composites delamination growth under fatigue loadings in 3D numerical analysis: the Sequential Static Fatigue algorithm10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107493 ↗
46. Measurement of mixed-mode delamination fracture toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites with mixed-mode bending apparatus10.1016/0266-3538(96)00005-X ↗
47. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.10.010 ↗
48. Progressive damage modeling of composite materials subjected to mixed mode cyclic loading using cohesive zone model10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103322 ↗
49. Dassault Systemès. Abaqus 2021 manual. n.d.
50. Delamination growth and thresholds in a carbon/epoxy composite under fatigue loading
51. A benchmark test for validating 3D simulation methods for delamination growth under quasi-static and fatigue loading10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.008 ↗
52. Cohesive analysis of a 3D benchmark for delamination growth under quasi-static and fatigue loading conditions10.1111/ffe.13712 ↗
53. A method for modelling arbitrarily shaped delamination fronts with large and distorted elements10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110193 ↗
54. Martulli LM, Salvi L, Bernasconi A. An automated remeshing algorithm for the numerical analysis of propagating delaminations. 21st European Conference on Composite Materials, Nantes, France: 2024.