Experimental and numerical analysis of low-cycle tooth bending fatigue in case-carburized gears
Source abstract
Abstract
• Experimental low-cycle fatigue tests were performed on case-carburized AISI 8620 gears. • FEM simulations included residual stresses and elastic–plastic material behavior. • Critical plane strain-based criteria predicted fatigue life, point of crack nucleation and initial crack trajectory. • Numerical predictions agreed well with experimental crack location and orientation. • Chen-Xu-Huang model provided accurate estimates of fatigue life to crack nucleation. Tooth root bending fatigue represents one of the main failure modes of gears. While most of the available literature focuses on tooth root bending under high-cycle fatigue, little has been researched regarding tooth root bending under low-cycle fatigue, even though it is encountered in high-demand industrial sectors. This work evaluates the single tooth bending low-cycle fatigue behaviour of case-carburized gears and presents a novel framework for its prediction, based on the combination of experiments and numerical analysis. Specifically, pulsator single tooth bending tests were performed on case-carburized AISI 8620 spur gears instrumented with strain gages to detect crack initiation. The same tests were replicated in a finite element simulation framework capable of accounting for residual stresses induced by case-carburizing. Simulation results were numerically processed through critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue, obtaining predictions about fatigue life, location of crack nucleation and crack initial trajectory, which were compared with test results. Numerically predicted crack initiation locations and trajectories agreed with the experimental means, with errors of 2.6 % and 8 %, respectively. This study presents a new use of critical plane criteria implemented with residual stresses for the analysis of tooth bending fatigue, providing a novel and comprehensive framework for the prediction of such phenomenon, supported by experimental validation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Radzevich · 2016
2. Investigation of crack propagation behaviour in thin-rim gears: Experimental tests and numerical simulations10.3390/ma16114095 ↗
3. Numerical analysis of the impact of shot peening on the tooth root strength of AlSi10Mg gears using critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria
4. Tooth bending fatigue failures in gears10.1016/1350-6307(96)00008-8 ↗
5. Development and application of high strength gears10.1007/s00170-024-13479-x ↗
6. Curà, F., Mura, A., & Corsaro, L. (2022). Experimental investigation on crack propagation paths in spur gears. InIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 1214, No. 1, p. 012029). IOP Publishing.10.1088/1757-899X/1214/1/012029 ↗
7. Influence of shot peening on bending tooth fatigue limit of case hardened gears10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00034-8 ↗
8. Effect of case depth on fatigue performance of AISI 8620 carburized steel10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00061-9 ↗
9. ISO 6336-3: Calculation of load capacity of spur and helical gears, Part 3: Calculation of tooth bending strength (2019).
10. ANSI/AGMA 2001-D04: Fundamental rating factors and calculation methods for involute spur and helical gear teeth (2004).
11. A comparison of gear tooth bending fatigue lives from single tooth bending and rotating gear tests10.1007/s10010-021-00510-w ↗
12. SAE J1619_201712: Single tooth gear bending fatigue test (2017).
13. A rotating gear test methodology for evaluation of high-cycle tooth bending fatigue lives under fully reversed and fully released loading conditions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105432 ↗
14. A study on the key influencing factors of gear fatigue strength testing based on the Locati method
15. Numerical model for bending fatigue life estimation of carburized spur gears with consideration of the adjacent tooth effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106515 ↗
16. Mean stress effect in multiaxial fatigue limit criteria10.1007/s00419-018-1421-7 ↗
17. Early crack propagation in single tooth bending fatigue: combination of finite element analysis and critical-planes fatigue criteria10.3390/met11111871 ↗
18. A theory for the effect of mean stress on fatigue of metals under combined torsion and axial load or bending10.1115/1.4008327 ↗
19. Pagliari · 2024
20. Krantz, T. L., Handschuh, R. F.: Gear tooth root stresses of a very heavily loaded gear pair: case study—Orbiter Body Flap Actuator Pinion and Ring Gear. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 57205, p. V010T11A005. ASME (2015).10.1115/DETC2015-46274 ↗
21. Handschuh, R. F., Krantz, T. L., Lerch, B. A., Burke, C. S.: Investigation of low-cycle bending fatigue of AISI 9310 steel spur gears. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 48086, pp. 871-877. ASME (2007).10.1115/DETC2007-34095 ↗
22. McIntire, W., Malott, R.: Advancement of spur gear design technology. USAAVLABS Technical Report 66–85. U.S. Army Aviation Materiel Laboratories, Ft. Eustis, Virginia (1966).10.21236/AD0646648 ↗
23. Low-cycle fatigue and ultimate strength related to gear design
24. Advanced rotorcraft transmission (ART) program—final report
25. Fatigue of gears in the finite life regime—experiments and probabilistic modelling10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.01.012 ↗
26. Computational model for bending fatigue prediction of surface hardened spur gears based on the multilayer method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106892 ↗
27. Analytical approach for low and high cycle bending fatigue life prediction of carburized gear steel specimens10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104328 ↗
28. Kumar, R., Dev, S.: Modification and characterization of the surface of AISI 8620 steel by C-TIGA and P-TIGA processes in one pass. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E 0(0) (2024).10.1177/09544089241304239 ↗
29. Improving the mechanical and electrochemical performance of additively manufactured 8620 low alloy steel via boriding10.3390/cmd4040032 ↗
30. In-situ image-based crack measurement methodology for gear single tooth bending fatigue testing10.1016/j.prostr.2024.03.021 ↗
31. An experimental evaluation of high-cycle gear tooth bending fatigue lives under fully reversed and fully released loading conditions with application to planetary gear sets10.1115/1.4047687 ↗
32. Anichowski, G., Kahraman, A., Hong, I.: Acoustic emission damage parameter for cumulative fatigue damage prediction in gear single tooth bending fatigue. In: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, vol. 87394, p. V011T11A008. ASME (2023).10.1115/DETC2023-116788 ↗
33. An experimental study on the accuracy of cumulative damage models in gear tooth bending fatigue10.1115/1.4064605 ↗
34. Kaleli · 2017
35. Fatigue behaviour and life predictions of case‐hardened steels10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01326.x ↗
36. A review of multiaxial low-cycle fatigue criteria for life prediction of metals10.1177/10567895241280788 ↗
37. A stress-strain funetion for the fatigue of metals
38. Multiaxial fatigue damage models10.1115/1.3225980 ↗
39. A critical plane‐strain energy density criterion for multiaxial low‐cycle fatigue life under non‐proportional loading
40. High-and low-cycle fatigue behavior of additively manufactured Ti6Al4V and influence of surface finish
41. ANSI/AGMA, 1010- F14: Appearance of Gear Teeth - Terminology of Wear and Failure (2014).d.