Fatigue strength estimation of net-shape L-PBF Co–Cr–Mo alloy via non-destructive surface measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
One of the primary challenges in utilizing additive manufacturing for load-bearing metal components in the aerospace industry lies in the relatively low fatigue strength and significant variability stemming from the typically rough as-built surfaces. The goal of this research is to develop a model able to robustly correlate parameters obtained by non-destructive measurements to the fatigue strength of a generic surface state for a cobalt-chrome alloy manufactured via laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF). The results show that a relatively accurate estimation of fatigue strength of a generic surface quality can be performed via high-quality non destructive roughness measurements coupled with statistical considerations and fracture mechanics-based assessments. This provides the capability of comparing different surface states and selecting the best option for fatigue strength with limited experimental effort and might prospectively set the basis for qualification of L-PBF components in the presence of rough surfaces.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (76)
Show source-provided references
1. Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
2. Additive manufacturing in the context of structural integrity10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.07.005 ↗
3. Defects and anomalies in powder bed fusion metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cossms.2021.100974 ↗
4. On the surface quality of additive manufactured parts10.1007/s00170-016-9215-y ↗
5. Mechanical behavior of additive manufactured, powder-bed laser-fused materials10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.068 ↗
6. Characterization and analysis of surface notches on Ti-alloy plates fabricated by additive manufacturing techniques
7. Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: A review10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.06.001 ↗
8. Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing
9. The influence of additive manufacturing processing parameters on surface roughness and fatigue life10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.025 ↗
10. Surface roughness parameter and modeling for fatigue behavior of additive manufactured parts: A non-destructive data-driven approach
11. Fatigue life prediction of a L-PBF component in Ti-6Al-4V using sample data, FE-based simulations and machine learning10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107276 ↗
12. Effect of surface roughness on fatigue performance of additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000053 ↗
13. Expression of additive manufacturing surface irregularities through a flaw-based assessment
14. Fatigue life prediction of additively manufactured material: Effects of surface roughness, defect size, and shape10.1111/ffe.12799 ↗
15. Surface roughness effect on multiaxial fatigue behavior of additive manufactured metals and its modeling10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102260 ↗
16. Fatigue of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel: The influence of porosity and surface roughness10.1111/ffe.13077 ↗
17. Effect of surface roughness on fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.032 ↗
18. High cycle fatigue behavior and life prediction for additively manufactured 17-4 PH stainless steel: Effect of sub-surface porosity and surface roughness10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102477 ↗
19. Fatigue strength assessment of “as built” AlSi10Mg manufactured by SLM with different build orientations10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105737 ↗
20. Effect of build orientation on the fatigue properties of as-built electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.006 ↗
21. Killer notches: The effect of as-built surface roughness on fatigue failure in AlSi10Mg produced by laser powder bed fusion
22. Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.013 ↗
23. Effect of post treatment on the microstructure, surface roughness and residual stress regarding the fatigue strength of selectively laser melted AlSi10Mg structures
24. A unified approach to model the effect of porosity and high surface roughness on the fatigue properties of additively manufactured Ti6-Al4-V alloys
25. Further studies into crack growth in additively manufactured materials10.3390/ma13102223 ↗
26. Mochache J, Taylor RM. A review of fatigue and damage tolerance life prediction methodologies toward certification of additively manufactured metallic principal structural elements. In: AIAA scitech 2021 forum. 2021, p. 1509.10.2514/6.2021-1509 ↗
27. Tilson · 2022
28. Information-rich quality controls prediction model based on non-destructive analysis for porosity determination of AISI H13 produced by electron beam melting10.1007/s00170-023-11153-2 ↗
29. Fatigue strength of LPBF Ti6Al4V machined under flood and cryogenic lubri-cooling conditions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106973 ↗
30. Ti6Al4V titanium alloy fatigue strength after AM- and machining-based process chains10.1016/j.cirp.2022.04.021 ↗
31. Leach · 2011
32. Geometrical metrology for metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.004 ↗
33. Standard method for microCT-based additive manufacturing quality control 3: Surface roughness10.1016/j.mex.2018.09.004 ↗
34. Leach · 2020
35. Surface roughness characterisation and analysis of the electron beam melting (EBM) process10.3390/ma12132211 ↗
36. The influence of heat accumulation on the surface roughness in powder-bed additive manufacturing
37. Areal topography measurement of metal additive surfaces using focus variation microscopy
38. Optimization of surface measurement for metal additive manufacturing using coherence scanning interferometry10.1117/1.OE.56.11.111714 ↗
39. Build orientation effect on Ti6Al4V thin-wall topography by electron beam powder bed fusion10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.039 ↗
40. An artificial intelligence classifier for electron beam powder bed fusion as-built surface topographies10.1016/j.cirpj.2023.03.006 ↗
41. Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.071 ↗
42. Nanoimprint lithography on curved surfaces prepared by fused deposition modelling
43. Microgeometry capture using an elastomeric sensor10.1145/2010324.1964941 ↗
44. Characterisation of the topography of metal additive surface features with different measurement technologies10.1088/1361-6501/aa7ce2 ↗
45. High-resolution microfocus X-Ray computed tomography for 3D surface roughness measurements of additive manufactured porous materials
46. Complementary use of optical metrology and X-Ray computed tomography for surface finish and defect detection in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing, no. 69
47. Areal surface texture data extraction from X-ray computed tomography reconstructions of metal additively manufactured parts10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.12.008 ↗
48. Advances in the metrological traceability and performance of X-ray computed tomography10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.001 ↗
49. ASTM - American Society for Testing and Materials · 2018
50. 2023
51. 2023
52. Orientation-dependent fatigue assessment of Ti6Al4V manufactured by L-PBF: Size of surface features and shielding effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107401 ↗
53. ISO - International Organisation for Standardisation · 2012
54. ISO - International Organisation for Standardisation · 2012
55. Gaussian process regression-based detection and correction of disturbances in surface topography measurements10.1002/qre.2980 ↗
56. ISO - International Organisation for Standardisation · 1998
57. The case of surface texture parameter RSm10.1088/0957-0233/17/3/S17 ↗
58. Crossing-the-line segmentation as a basis for rsm and rc evaluation
59. Effect of size and geometry of small defects on the fatigue limit10.1016/B978-008044064-4/50004-9 ↗
60. The influence of additive manufacturing processing parameters on surface roughness and fatigue life10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.025 ↗
61. Surface roughness effect on multiaxial fatigue behavior of additive manufactured metals and its modeling10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102260 ↗
62. A novel test method for the fatigue characterization of metal powder bed fused alloys10.1016/j.prostr.2017.11.062 ↗
63. Fatigue behavior of L-PBF metals: Cost-effective characterization via specimen miniaturization10.1007/s11665-021-05717-0 ↗
64. Process qualification of laser powder bed fusion based on processing-defect structure-fatigue properties in Ti-6Al-4V
65. Influence of defects and as-built surface roughness on fatigue properties of additively manufactured alloy 71810.1016/j.msea.2018.08.072 ↗
66. Modeling the systematic behavior at the micro and nano length scales
67. ASTM E739-10. Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life
68. JSME - Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers. JSME S 002. Standard method of statistical fatigue testing.
69. The up-and-down method with small samples10.1080/01621459.1953.10483472 ↗
70. Qualification of AM parts: Extreme value statistics applied to tomographic measurements10.1016/j.matdes.2017.05.091 ↗
71. Effects of defects in laser additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on fatigue properties10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.120 ↗
72. A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.020 ↗
73. Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.020 ↗
74. An analysis of defects influence on axial fatigue strength of maraging steel specimens produced by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.034 ↗
75. Fatigue crack propagation of short cracks10.1115/1.3443647 ↗
76. Benchmark of a probabilistic fatigue software based on machined and as-built components manufactured in AlSi10Mg by L-PBF10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107171 ↗