Validation of the multiaxial racetrack amplitude filter
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Amplitude filters are a most important tool in practical fatigue analyses to manage their computational cost when, as usual, the measured load history is noisy, oversampled, too long, and/or contains too many non-damaging low-amplitude cycles or events. To reduce the calculation burden, such filters should not only eliminate noise and remove redundant oversampled data from the measured signal, but also neglect small amplitudes that do not cause fatigue damage. The veteran racetrack filter can perform all such tasks efficiently, however it is limited to uniaxial load histories. Multiaxial filtering techniques have been proposed in the past, however they fail to identify the most damaging events in several non-proportional histories, in addition to losing information on the load path shape. In this work, a new, fast, and efficient multiaxial version of the traditional racetrack filter is proposed to solve these issues, synchronously filtering complex loading histories while preserving all their significant reversals and equivalent ranges, and their load path shape as well, a most important feature for multiaxial fatigue analyses. Six and three-dimensional versions of the filter are proposed, respectively for invariant-based and critical-plane damage calculation approaches. The method allows not only the proper filtering of stress/strain histories at a given material point, but also of any history of multi-dimensional quantities such as forces, moments, and/or displacements acting at different points of a structure. The filter efficiency is evaluated from tension–torsion experiments in 316L stainless steel tubular specimens with challenging non-proportional path shapes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Fuchs HO, Nelson DV, Burke MA, Toomay TL. Shortcuts in cumulative damage analysis. SAE automobile engineering meeting paper 730565; 1973.10.4271/730565 ↗
2. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress
3. ASTM E 1049. Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis. ASTM International.
4. Simple rainflow counting algorithms10.1016/0142-1123(82)90018-4 ↗
5. Bannantine · 1991 · vol. 10 · 35
6. Computer based simulation of cyclic stress–strain behavior with applications to fatigue
7. Conle FA. A computer simulation assisted statistical approach to the problem of random fatigue. M.Sc. thesis. University of Waterloo; 1974.
8. Rainflow counting algorithm for very long stress histories10.1016/0142-1123(87)90025-9 ↗
9. Bannantine · 1990
10. Standardization of the rainflow counting method for fatigue analysis10.1016/0142-1123(94)90343-3 ↗
11. Automation of the fatigue design under variable amplitude loading using the ViDa software10.1108/ijsi.2010.43601aab.001 ↗
12. Equivalence of four-point and three-point rainflow cycle counting algorithms10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.006 ↗
13. Dally · 2001
14. An improved multiaxial rainflow algorithm for non-proportional stress or strain histories – Part I: Enclosing surface methods10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.014 ↗
15. Life prediction techniques for variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue – Part 1: Theories10.1115/1.2806821 ↗
16. An improved multiaxial rainflow algorithm for non-proportional stress or strain histories – Part II: The modified wang–brown method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.10.012 ↗
17. Bannantine JA. A variable amplitude multiaxial fatigue life prediction method. FCP report n.151, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 1989.
18. Meggiolaro MA, Castro JTP, Wu H. Shortcuts in multiple dimensions: the multiaxial racetrack filter. I workshop challenges in multiaxial fatigue, Urbino, Italy; 2015.10.3221/IGF-ESIS.33.40 ↗
19. Predictions of cumulative fatigue damage using condensed load histories
20. Sur la détermination des polynômes d’approximation de degré donnée
21. Luenberger · 1973
22. Prediction of non-proportionality factors of multiaxial histories using the Moment Of Inertia method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.11.016 ↗
23. Behavior of metals under complex static and alternating stresses
24. Crossland B. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. International Conf on Fatigue of Metals, London: IMechE; 1956. p. 138–49.
25. A critical plane approach to multiaxial damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
26. A stress–strain parameter for the fatigue of metals
27. Two new multiaxial criteria for high cycle fatigue computation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.015 ↗
28. A bi-parametric Wöhler curve for high cycle multiaxial fatigue assessment10.1046/j.1460-2695.2002.00462.x ↗
29. Multiaxial fatigue limits and material sensitivity to non-zero mean stresses normal to the critical planes10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01228.x ↗
30. ASTM E2207-08. Standard practice for strain-controlled axial-torsional fatigue testing with thin-walled tubular specimens; 2013.
31. Socie · 2000
32. Multiaxial cycle counting for critical plane methods10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00148-2 ↗
33. Young · 1993
34. Statistical evaluation of strain-life fatigue crack initiation predictions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.10.003 ↗
35. Nonproportional low cycle fatigue criterion for type 304 stainless steel10.1115/1.2804541 ↗