A fatigue crack growth prediction model for cracked specimen under variable amplitude loading
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to propose a crack growth prediction model for cracked specimens under large and variable amplitude loading conditions. In this study, the concept of change in net-section strain energy was applied to simulate elastic–plastic fracture behavior, and three-dimensional fitting of the results with respect to changes in the net-section strain energy, load ratio, and crack growth rate was performed to create the crack growth prediction model. The validity of the generated model was examined using comparisons with experimental data as well as simulation results from existing crack growth models under several variable loading conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. ASME, Power Piping:ASME B31.1-2020; 2020.
2. ASME, ASME B&PV Code, Section III, Div 1; 2021.
3. ASME, ASME B&PV Code, Section XI, Div 1; 2021.
4. Koo DS, Cheong YM, Jung HK, Park CS, Park JS, Choi H, Jung S. Analysis of defective pipings in nuclear power plants and applications of guided ultrasonic wave techniques; 2006.
5. OPDE—The international pipe failure data exchange project10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.01.002 ↗
6. USNRC. Pressurizer surge line thermal stratification; 1988.
7. USNRC. Rupture in extraction steam piping as a result of flow accelerated corrosion; 1997.
8. IAEA. Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna; 2012.
9. Hopper A, Wilowski G, Scott P, Olson R. The second international piping integrity research group (IPIRG-2) program. Final report, October 1991--April 1996, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Washington, DC (United States); 1997.10.2172/459885 ↗
10. Cyclic tearing and crack growth in circumferentially cracked straight pipes10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00822.x ↗
11. Strain-based structural integrity evaluation methods for nuclear power plant piping under beyond design basis earthquake10.20466/KPVP.2016.12.2.066 ↗
12. Linear and non-linear analyses for semi-elliptical surface cracks in pipes under bending10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.11.001 ↗
13. Schmidt · 1992
14. Wilkowski G. Degraded piping program-Phase II; 1989.
15. Yamaguchi Y, Katsuyama J, Li Y, Onizawa K. Crack growth evaluation for cracked carbon and stainless steel pipes under large seismic cyclic loading. In: Pressure vessels and piping conference, American society of mechanical engineers; 2015. p. V06AT06A066.10.1115/PVP2015-45834 ↗
16. Donavin PR, Gilada R, Gustin H, Vo T, Pace R. Technical basis for proposed ASME section XI code case on beyond design bases earthquake. In: Pressure vessels and piping conference, American society of mechanical engineers; 2016. p. V01AT01A006.10.1115/PVP2016-63827 ↗
17. Excitation tests on elbow pipe specimens to investigate failure behavior under excessive seismic loads10.1115/1.4037952 ↗
18. Key issues in cyclic plastic deformation: experimentation10.1016/j.mechmat.2011.07.011 ↗
19. Mechanics of fatigue crack growth under large-scale plasticity: A direct physical approach for single-valued correlation of fatigue crack growth data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.010 ↗
20. Anderson · 2017
21. Suresh S. Fatigue of materials. Cambridge university press; 1998.10.1017/CBO9780511806575 ↗
22. Begley J, Landes J. The J integral as a fracture criterion; 1972.10.1520/STP38816S ↗
23. Begley J, Landes J. A comparison of the J-integral fracture criterion with the equivalent energy concept. In: Progress in flaw growth and fracture toughness testing, ASTM International; 1973.10.1520/STP49644S ↗
24. Rice J, Paris P, Merkle J. Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates. In: Progress in flaw growth and fracture toughness testing. ASTM International; 1973.10.1520/STP49643S ↗
25. A comparison of crack-tip field parameters for large and small fatigue cracks10.1115/1.3225868 ↗
26. Paris P, Erdogan F. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws; 1963.10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
27. Fatigue crack growth in miniature specimens: The equivalence of ΔK-correlation and that based on the change in net-section strain energy density10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.05.018 ↗
28. Dieter · 1976
29. Low-cycle fatigue crack growth prediction by strain intensity factor10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.11.002 ↗
30. ANSYS, Mechanical release 21; 2021.
31. Fatigue crack propagation under program and random loads. Fatigue crack propagation, ASTM STP
32. Fatigue crack growth simulation of aluminium alloy under spectrum loadings10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.039 ↗
33. Analysis for post-impact tensile-tensile fatigue damage of 2024–T3 sheets based on tests, digital image correlation (DIC) technique and finite element simulation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.010 ↗
34. Structural life assessment methods
35. A model of fatigue crack growth under various load spectra
36. Fatigue crack growth with overload under spectrum loading10.1016/j.tafmec.2005.06.001 ↗
37. Fatigue crack growth under variable-amplitude loading: Part II–Code development and model validation10.1016/S0307-904X(01)00027-0 ↗
38. Prediction of fatigue crack growth life under variable-amplitude loading using finite element analysis10.1016/j.crme.2019.06.008 ↗
39. Experimental fatigue crack growth behavior and predictions under multiaxial variable amplitude service loading histories10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.11.023 ↗
40. Fatigue crack growth under constant and variable amplitude loading at semi-elliptical and V-notched steel specimens10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.670 ↗
41. Fatigue crack growth in fibre metal laminates under selective variable-amplitude loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01333.x ↗