journal article·2022-06Open access

Application of machine learning algorithms for the optimization of the fabrication process of steel springs to improve their fatigue performance

Estela Ruiz, Diego Ferreño, Miguel Cuartas, Borja Arroyo, Isidro A. Carrascal, Isaac Rivas, Federico Gutiérrez-Solana

Abstract

Machine Learning algorithms are aimed at building generalizable models to provide accurate predictions or to find patterns from noisy data. These characteristics are potentially beneficial for the fabrication of steel products. In this research, 529 rotating bending fatigue tests (R = -1 and σa = 400 MPa) were carried out on steel suspension spring bars fabricated using different combinations of manufacturing parameters. A reliable regression model (R2 = 0.877 on the test dataset) based on the Gradient Boosting algorithm was obtained. The interpretation of the model was carried out through the Permutation Importance algorithm, revealing the relevance of the temperature in the tempering treatment applied after quenching on the fatigue lifespan. This pattern was quantitatively described by means of the Partial Dependence Plot of this feature. Besides, a specific study was carried out to obtain a reliable interpretation of the results derived from the Machine Learning analysis. In this sense, it has been observed that specimens subjected to high temperature tempering display a lower surface hardness that provokes a higher surface roughness after shot peening; this, in turn, facilitates the initiation of surface cracks during the fatigue tests reducing the fatigue lifespan. This study provides a reliable framework to optimize the suspension spring manufacturing conditions to increase their fatigue lifespan as well as an example, generalizable to other manufacturing processes, of the potential benefits of Machine Learning.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Ritchie H. Cars, planes, trains: where do CO2 emissions from transport come from? Our World Data 2020. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport (accessed August 2, 2021).
2. Machine-learning-based investigation into the effect of defect/inclusion on fatigue behavior in steels10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106597 ↗
3. On the use of data-driven machine learning for remaining life estimation of metallic materials based on Ye-Wang damage theory10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106666 ↗
4. Fatigue life prediction of metallic materials considering mean stress effects by means of an artificial neural network10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105527 ↗
5. Super-long life tension-compression fatigue properties of quenched and tempered 0.46% carbon steel10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00028-0 ↗
6. Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Loading Impact From the Progressive Gear on the Lift Braking Distance With the Use of the Free Fall Method10.12913/22998624/62628 ↗
7. Tentative fatigue strength reduction factors for silicate-type inclusions in high-strength steels
8. 2009
9. Very-high-cycle fatigue behavior of Ti-6Al-4V manufactured by selective laser melting: Effect of build orientation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105628 ↗
10. The effect of inclusions on the fatigue strength of SAE 4340 steels
11. Investigation through artificial neural networks on the influence of shot peening on the hardness of ASTM TX304HB stainless steel10.1520/JTE20180819 ↗
12. Hierarchically Aggregated Optimization Algorithm for Heterogeneously Dispersed Utility Functions10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.2287 ↗
13. 2013
14. Optimization of the fabrication of cold drawn steel wire through classification and clustering machine learning algorithms10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2942957 ↗
15. Wente EF, Nutting J, Wondris EF. Steel. Encycl Br 2019. https://www.britannica.com/technology/steel (accessed May 20, 2021).
16. Machine learning algorithms for the prediction of non-metallic inclusions in steel wires for tire reinforcement10.1007/s10845-020-01623-9 ↗
17. Ruiz E, Ferreño D, Cuartas M, Lloret L, Ruiz Del Árbol PM, López A, et al. Machine learning methods for the prediction of the inclusion content of clean steel fabricated by electric arc furnace and rolling. Metals (Basel) 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/met11060914.10.3390/met11060914 ↗
18. Machine learning algorithms for the prediction of the strength of steel rods: an example of data-driven manufacturing in steelmaking10.1080/0951192X.2020.1803505 ↗
19. ISO 1143:2010. Metallic materials-Rotating bar bending fatigue testing. ISO Stand., 2010, p. 26.
20. Castillo E, Fernandez-Canteli A. A Unified Statistical Methodology for Modeling Fatigue Damage. Springer Netherlands; 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9182-7.10.1007/978-1-4020-9182-7 ↗
21. Castillo E, Fernández-Canteli A, Ruiz-Ripoll ML. A general model for fatigue damage due to any stress history. Int J Fatigue 2008;30:150–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.011.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.011 ↗
22. A statistical model of fatigue failure incorporating effects of specimen size and load amplitude on fatigue life10.1080/14786435.2019.1609707 ↗
23. Scikit-learn
24. Geron A. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow. O’Reilly M. 2017.
25. Guido S, Müller A. Introduction to Machine Learning with Python. A Guide for Data Scientists. O’Reilly Media; 2016.
26. The Supervised Learning No-Free-Lunch Theorems. 6th Online World Conf
27. Wolpert DH, Macready WG. No free lunch theorems. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1997;1:67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62007-6_12.10.1109/4235.585893 ↗
28. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. Classification and Regression Trees. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1984.
29. ISO 4287:1997. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Profile method — Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO Stand., ISO International Organization for Standardization; 1997, p. 1–5.
30. Castillo E, Ramos A, Koller R, López-Aenlle M, Fernández-Canteli A. A critical comparison of two models for assessment of fatigue data. Int J Fatigue 2008;30:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.014.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.014 ↗
31. Schijve J. Fatigue predictions and scatter. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 1994;17:381–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00239.x.10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00239.x ↗
32. Kottegoda N. Applied Statistics for Civil and Environmental. 2008.
33. de Forest A V. The rate of growth of fatigue cracks. J Appl Mech 1936;3:A-23-A-25.10.1115/1.4008666 ↗
34. Canale LCF, Vatavuk J, Totten GE. 12.02 - Introduction to Steel Heat Treatment. In: Hashmi S, Batalha GF, Van Tyne CJ, Yilbas BBT-CMP, editors., Oxford: Elsevier; 2014, p. 3–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01202-4.10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01202-4 ↗
35. Krauss G. 12.11 - Quench and Tempered Martensitic Steels: Microstructures and Performance. In: Hashmi S, Batalha GF, Van Tyne CJ, Yilbas BBT-CMP, editors., Oxford: Elsevier; 2014, p. 363–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01212-7.10.1016/B978-0-08-096532-1.01212-7 ↗