Modelling and predicting of the LCF-behaviour of aluminium auxetic structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study presents the experimental and computational analysis for determining the fatigue life of the auxetic cellular structures made of aluminium alloys. For the fatigue life calculation, the strain life approach was applied in the framework of the ANSYS software. The obtained experimental results were evaluated using the comprehensive statistical analysis, and presented in the form of different fatigue-life curves. Based on the reasonable agreement between computational and experimental results the proposed computational model was validated and can be used further for the fatigue studies of various auxetic structures made of Al-alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Advanced Materials and Mechanics · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Architected cellular piezoelectric metamaterials: Thermo-electro-mechanical properties10.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.001 ↗
2. Gibson LJ, Ashby MF. Cellular Solids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878326.10.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
3. Modelling, and characterization of 3D printed cellular structures10.1016/j.matdes.2018.01.028 ↗
4. Architected cellular materials: A review on their mechanical properties towards fatigue-tolerant design and fabrication10.1016/j.mser.2021.100606 ↗
5. From stochastic foam to designed structure: Balancing cost and performance of cellular metals10.3390/ma10080922 ↗
6. Thermal conductivity of architected cellular metamaterials10.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.061 ↗
7. New insights on cellular structures strengthening mechanisms and thermal stability of an austenitic stainless steel fabricated by laser powder-bed-fusion10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11.018 ↗
8. Composite materials with poisson’s ratios close to - 110.1016/0022-5096(92)90063-8 ↗
9. Design of planar isotropic negative Poisson’s ratio structures10.1016/j.eml.2015.05.002 ↗
10. Auxetic behaviour from rotating semi-rigid units10.1002/pssb.200572706 ↗
11. Novel honeycombs with auxetic behaviour10.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.006 ↗
12. Auxetic Cellular Materials - a Review. Strojniški Vestn –10.5545/sv-jme.2016.3656 ↗
13. Indentation resilience of conventional and auxetic foams10.1177/0021955X9803400304 ↗
14. An isotropic three-dimensional structure with Poisson’s ratio=-110.1007/BF00042531 ↗
15. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00054-2 ↗
16. Auxetic behavior from rotating squares10.1023/A:1006781224002 ↗
17. Negative Poisson’s Ratios From Rotating Rectangles10.12921/cmst.2004.10.02.137-145 ↗
18. Low porosity metallic periodic structures with negative poisson’s ratio10.1002/adma.201304464 ↗
19. Novel mechanism for generating auxetic behaviour in reticulated foams: Missing rib foam model10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00269-X ↗
20. Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson ’ s Ratio10.1126/science.235.4792.1038 ↗
21. Microstructural modelling of auxetic microporous polymers10.1007/BF00349875 ↗
22. Auxetic nanomaterials: Recent progress and future development10.1063/1.4964479 ↗
23. Nano- and Micro-Auxetic Plasmonic Materials10.1002/adma.201600088 ↗
24. Negative Poisson’s ratios in angle-ply laminates: theory and experiment10.1016/0010-4361(94)90027-2 ↗
25. Numerical and experimental analysis of a triangular auxetic core made of CFR-PEEK using the Directionally Reinforced Integrated Single-yarn (DIRIS) architecture10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.01.013 ↗
26. Auxetic nail: Design and experimental study10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.013 ↗
27. How does negative Poisson’s ratio of foam filler affect crashworthiness?10.1016/j.matdes.2015.05.050 ↗
28. Negative Poisson’s ratios in cellular foam materials10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.229 ↗
29. A new auxetic structure with significantly reduced stress concentration effects10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107779 ↗
30. Dynamic crushing of double-arrowed auxetic structure under impact loading10.1016/j.matdes.2018.09.041 ↗
31. Fatigue-related damping in some cellular metallic materials10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.090 ↗
32. Shape optimization of SMA structures with respect to fatigue10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108456 ↗
33. Fatigue of Cellular Structures – a Review. Strojniški Vestn –10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6070 ↗
34. Nonlinear properties of metallic cellular materials with a negative Poisson’s ratio10.1007/BF02403846 ↗
35. Numerical modelling of a chiral auxetic cellular structure under multiaxial loading conditions10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102514 ↗
36. Assessing the cracking behavior of auxetic cellular structures by using both a numerical and an experimental approach10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.02.008 ↗
37. Fatigue crack initiation and propagation in re-entrant auxetic cellular structures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.010 ↗
38. The computational LCF-analyses of chiral and Re-entrant auxetic structure using the direct cyclic algorithm10.1016/j.msea.2020.139618 ↗
39. Ulbin M, Borovinšek M, Vesenjak M, Glodež S. Computational Fatigue Analysis of Auxetic Cellular Structures Made of SLM AlSi10Mg Alloy. Met 2020;10:945. https://doi.org/10.3390/MET10070945.10.3390/met10070945 ↗
40. Low-cycle fatigue behavior of 3D-printed metallic auxetic structure10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.130 ↗
41. Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterials10.1016/j.actbio.2021.03.015 ↗
42. Prediction of static and low-cycle durability of porous cellular structures with positive and negative Poisson’s ratios10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102479 ↗
43. Low-cycle fatigue life of thin-plate auxetic cellular structures made from aluminium alloy 7075–T65110.1111/ffe.12966 ↗
44. Mechanical behaviour of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio thermoplastic polyurethane foams under compressive cyclic loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.015 ↗
45. Tensile fatigue of conventional and negative Poisson’s ratio open cell PU foams10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.005 ↗
46. Low cycle fatigue behaviour of ductile aluminium alloys using the inelastic energy approach10.1016/j.msea.2020.140385 ↗
47. Joint estimation of E-N curves and their scatter using evolutionary algorithms10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.005 ↗
48. Influence of fatigue–life data modelling on the estimated reliability of a structure subjected to a constant-amplitude loading10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.026 ↗
49. ASTM E739-91(2004). Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life (S-N) and strain-life (e-N) Fatigue Data. ASTM Int West Conshohocken, PA; 2004.
50. Estimating Fatigue Curves with the Random Fatigue-Limit Model10.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 ↗
51. A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
52. A Durability Prediction for the Magnesium Alloy AZ31 based on Plastic and Total Energy10.3390/met9090973 ↗
53. High cycle fatigue of welded joints with aging influence10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.059 ↗
54. High-cycle fatigue and fracture behaviours of SLM AlSi10Mg alloy10.1016/S1003-6326(20)65403-6 ↗
55. Estimating S-N curves and their scatter using a differential ant-stigmergy algorithm10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.02.015 ↗
56. ANSYS Inc. ANSYS Theory Reference - Release 5.6. Theory Ref 1999:1–1286.
57. Dowling NE. Mechanical Behavior of Materials. vol. 15; 2000.10.1080/10426910008913020 ↗
58. ASTM E606 / E606M-19e1. Standard Test Method for Strain-Controlled Fatigue Testing. ASTM Int West Conshohocken, PA; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0606_E0606M-19E01.10.1520/E0606_E0606M-19E01 ↗
59. Eliminating friction between flat specimens and an antibuckling support during cyclic tests using a simple sensor10.1088/1361-6501/ab1e35 ↗
60. Comparison of different one-parameter damage laws and local stress-strain approaches in multiaxial fatigue life assessment of notched components10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106405 ↗
61. Evaluating the Statistical Significance of a Fatigue-Life Reduction Due to Macro-Porosity10.5545/sv-jme.2013.1453 ↗
62. Fractal dimension for bending–torsion fatigue fracture characterisation10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109910 ↗