journal article·2018-07Open access

Comparison of fatigue crack growth stress ratio effects under simple variable amplitude loading using fractographic and strain measurements

P.D. White, S.A. Barter, N. Medhekar

Abstract

Abstract Crack closure, the contact between opposing crack faces above zero load, has traditionally been used to explain the observation that higher stress ratio fatigue cycles have faster growth rates than lower stress ratio cycles. Using new techniques to investigate the dependance of stress ratio on crack closure, we tested simplified variable amplitude loading sequences containing segments of 100 cycles at different stress ratios in AA7050-T7451 alloy. We compared the crack growth at different stress ratios at the start of a coupon with no closure and after 5 mm or more of crack growth where significant closure had developed as indicated by side and back-face strain gauges mounted on the coupon. Fractographic measurements of the fatigue growth from these sequences show the same stress ratio effect at the start of loading and after 5 mm of growth, suggesting that the stress ratio effect occurs soon after the commencement of growth and that crack closure is not the dominant cause of the stress ratio effect in the AA7050-T7451 alloy. Results from these tests using constant and varying maximum stress intensity K max also showed significantly different stress ratio effects. Traditional constant amplitude load tests over-predict the rate of crack growth for cycles in which the maximum load is varying. Obtaining crack growth rates for a range of different stress ratios from variable amplitude testing in this way can allow greater accuracy to be achieved in predicting the rate of crack growth for arbitrary variable amplitude loading sequences.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
2. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
3. Elber W. The significance of fatigue crack closure. In: Damage tolerance of aircraft structures. ASTM STP 486. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1971. p. 230–42.10.1520/STP26680S ↗
4. A review of crack closure, fatigue crack threshold and related phenomena10.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-4 ↗
5. Fractographic reassessment of the significance of fatigue crack closure10.1520/JAI12003 ↗
6. Shih TT, Wei RP. A study of crack closure in fatigue. Tech rep NASA CR-2319. NASA; 1973.
7. Newman Jr, JC. A finite-element analysis of fatigue crack closure. In: Mechanics of crack growth. No. 590 in ASTM STP. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1976. p. 281–301.10.1520/STP33952S ↗
8. Walker KF. Roughness-induced crack closure in the threshold region for high strength aircraft structural alloys. PhD thesis, RMIT University; 2015.
9. Fatigue of materials
10. E647 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. ASTM International; 2013.
11. Fatigue and crack growth in 7050-T7451 aluminum alloy under constant- and variable-amplitude loading10.1115/1.4007755 ↗
12. Fatigue crack propagation in 7050-T7451 plate alloy10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.01.006 ↗
13. A two-parameter driving force for fatigue crack growth analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.07.002 ↗
14. A study of the stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth using the unified two-parameter fatigue crack growth driving force10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.008 ↗
15. The effect of stress ratio on fatigue crack growth rate in the absence of closure10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00043-1 ↗
16. Small crack growth rates from simple sequences containing underloads in AA7050-T745110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.014 ↗
17. Fractographic study on the use of rainflow counting for small and long cracks in AA705010.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.687 ↗
18. Goldsmith NT, Clark G. Analysis and interpretation of aircraft component defects using quantitative fractography. In: Quantitative methods in fractography. ASTM STP 1085. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1990. p. 131–68.10.1520/STP23534S ↗
19. The significance of fractography for investigations of fatigue crack growth under variable-amplitude loading10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00147.x ↗
20. McMillan JC, Pelloux RMN. Fatigue crack propagation under program and random loads. In: Fatigue crack propagation. ASTM STP 415. ASTM International; 1967. p. 505–35.10.1520/STP47241S ↗
21. Fatigue crack propagation under programmed loads and crack tip opening displacements10.1016/0013-7944(70)90031-7 ↗
22. Assessment of crack tip closure in an aluminum alloy by elctronfractography10.1111/j.1460-2695.1979.tb00365.x ↗
23. Prakash RV, Sunder R. Crack closure stress estimation by decodable marker banding techniques and comparison of results with electron fractographic technique. Part L: J Mater Des Appl, vol. 221; 2007. p. 53–62.10.1243/14644207JMDA89 ↗
24. Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress–fatigue lives under random loading. In: Preliminary proceedings of the Chugoku-Shikoku District Meeting, The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1968. p. 3740.
25. Cycle counting for fatigue crack growth analysis10.1016/0142-1123(84)90032-X ↗
26. Barter S. Fatigue cracking in aluminium alloy 7050-T7451–quantitative fractographic methods and life prediction. PhD thesis, Monash University; 2007.
27. Back-face strain compliance relation for compact specimens for wide range in crack lengths10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.07.001 ↗
28. The micromechanisms of fatigue crack growth in a commercial Al-Zn-Mg-Cu alloy10.1016/0001-6160(82)90175-4 ↗
29. Fatigue crack path manipulation for crack growth rate measurement10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.04.020 ↗
30. Skinn DA, Gallagher JP, Berens AP, Huber PD, Smith J. Damage tolerant design handbook. Tech rep WL-TR-94-4055, University of Dayton Research Institute; 1994.