A stress versus crack growth rate investigation (aka stress – cubed rule)
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A means of determining the effect on the crack growth rate of a variation in the stress level, for the same basic spectrum and material, is often needed for the interpretation of aircraft fatigue test results, for the design of repairs or to assess the effect of weight increases. This paper describes one such tool colloquially known as the stress-cubed (or cubic) rule, and provides examples of its application to a number of materials, spectra and stress concentrations. It is shown that for lead cracks the CG rate at one stress level can be predicted accurately with knowledge of the second stress level, its CG rate and the effective initiating crack size.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Main B SQNLDR. Structural Analysis Methodology – F/A-18, Issue 2 AI2, RAAF, Directorate General Technical Airworthiness, Dec 2007.
2. Practical application of structural repair fatigue life determination on the AP-3C Orion platform10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.891-892.1065 ↗
3. The propagation of fatigue cracks in test specimens10.1016/0022-5096(58)90018-8 ↗
4. An experimental evaluation of fatigue crack growth10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.04.002 ↗
5. The equivalence of EPS and EIFS based on the same crack growth life data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.05.009 ↗
6. Pell RA, Molent L, Green AJ. The fractographical comparison of F/A-18 aluminium alloy 7050-T7451 bulkhead representative coupons tested under two fatigue load spectra at several stress levels, DSTO-TR-1547, Feb 2004.
7. Interpreting fatigue test results using a probabilistic fracture approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.006 ↗
8. Zhuang W, Barter SA, McDonald M, Molent L. Fatigue crack growth life assessment of the F/A-18 aft fuselage frames (Y645 and Y657), DSTO-TR-1826, Feb 2006.
9. McDonald M, Molent L, Green AJ. Assessment of fatigue crack growth prediction models for F/A-18 representative spectra and material. DSTO-RR-0312; 2006.
10. Evaluation of spectrum fatigue crack growth using variable amplitude data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.025 ↗
11. Experimentally derived crack growth models for different stress concentration factors10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.008 ↗
12. The lead crack fatigue lifing framework10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.09.009 ↗
13. DEF STAN 00-970, Leaflet 201/3, UK Ministry of Defence, vol. 1, Oct 1987.
14. A review of equivalent pre-crack sizes in aluminium alloy 7050–T745110.1111/ffe.12214 ↗
15. Alternative methods for derivation of safe life limits for a 7050-T7451 aluminium alloy structure10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.12.012 ↗
16. Fatigue crack growth and damage tolerance, invited review paper10.1111/ffe.12155 ↗
17. Potter JM, Gallagher JP, Stalnaker HD. The effect of spectrum variations on the fatigue behavior of notched structures representing F-4E/S wing stations, AFFDL-TM-74-2-FBR, January 1974.
18. Speaker SM, Gordon DE, Kaarlela WT, Meder A, Nay RO, Nordquist FC. Durability method development, vol. VIII. Test and fractography data. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, AFFDL-79-3118; 1982.
19. Chang JB, Hiyama RM, Szamossi M. Improved methods for predicting spectrum loading effects. AFFDL-TR-79-3036, Phase 2, Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force; 1981.
20. Block-by-block approaches for spectrum fatigue crack growth prediction10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.06.033 ↗
21. Matricciani E, Duthie J, Walker K. DSTO P-3 FAMS/FASTRAN recalibration coupon testing in support of the 2010 structural management plan review, DSTO-TR-2659. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Aust.; Aug 2015.
22. Aircraft life management using crack initiation and crack growth models – P-3C Aircraft experience10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.03.017 ↗
23. The generalised Frost–Dugdale approach to modelling fatigue crack growth10.1016/j.engfailanal.2007.11.007 ↗
24. A small-crack growth law and its related phenomena10.1016/0013-7944(92)90297-R ↗
25. Cansdale · 2002
26. Irving PE, Lin J, Bristow JW. Damage tolerance in helicopter - Report on the round robin challenge. American helicopter society 59th Annual forum phoenix, Arizona; 2003.
27. Damage tolerance analysis of a helicopter component10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.012 ↗
28. Crack growth from physically small flaws10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.031 ↗