journal article·2021-04

Required Fatigue Strength (RFS) for evaluating of spectrum loaded components by the example of cast-aluminium passenger car wheels

C.M. Sonsino, M. Breitenberger, I. Krause, K. Pötter, S. Schröder, K. Jürgens

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper displays, through the example of a cast aluminium wheel (G-AlSi7Mg0.3 T6, i. e. EN AC-42100 T6 or A 356 T6), the evaluation of critical areas through the method of Required Fatigue Strength (RFS). The RFS-values are derived from the local design spectra of the most critical areas of the component by searching the position of local particular Woehler-lines resulting in the prescribed allowable damage sum Dal within the cumulative damage calculation by the modified Palmgren-Miner hypothesis according to Haibach. The RFS-value is nothing more than the knee point of the calculated Woehler-line with defined slopes and cycle position of the knee point. As long as the production process delivers a material quality, i.e. a component related fatigue strength exceeding the calculated RFS-values, the required service durability is fulfilled. The paper demonstrates, through the example of a cast aluminium passenger car wheel, the evaluation of critical areas through RFS-values derived from the local design spectra of the most critical areas of the component and the experimental verification of the required service durability for 300,000 km and load occurrence probability of Po,Load ≤ 1%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue life of ball bearings
2. Cumulative damage in fatigue10.1115/1.4009458 ↗
3. Haibach · 2003
4. Sonsino CM. Principles of variable amplitude fatigue design and testing, fatigue testing and analysis under variable amplitude loading conditions. In: McKeighan PC, Ranganathan N, editors. ASTM STP 1439. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM Int.; 2005. p. 3–23.10.1520/STP11294S ↗
5. Grubisic V, Sonsino CM, Toni O. Development of data for strength evaluation of vehicle wheels – Data for determination of fatigue life of wheels for different load spectra. Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability LBF, Darmstadt/Germany, Report-No. 3067/1; 1973 [not published, in German].
6. Sonsino CM, Breitenberger M, Schröder S, Jürgens K. Evaluation of spectrum loaded components by the damage equivalent method of required fatigue strength (RFS) through the example of passenger car wheels. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Material and Component Performance under Variable Amplitude Loading (VAL4), scheduled from 30. March to 1. April 2020 in Darmstadt, Germany, Publisher: DVM, Berlin; 2020. p. 497–510.
7. Grubisic V. Procedures for optimal assessment of vehicle wheels. Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability LBF, Darmstadt/Germany. Report No. FB-86; 1970 [in German].
8. Grubisic V. Criteria and methodology for lightweight design of vehicle components subjected to random loads. SAE-Paper No. 850367. Warrendale, PA/USA; 1985.10.4271/850367 ↗
9. Determination of load spectra for design and testing10.1504/IJVD.1994.061902 ↗
10. Grubisic V. Conditions and requirements for a reliable durability proof, DVM-Report No. 125. Berlin/Germany: German Association for Materials Research and Testing (DVM); 1998. p. 9–22 [in German].
11. Sonsino CM, Berg A, Grubisic V. Structural durability proof of automotive safety components – Present state of the art. SAE-Paper No. 2005-01-0800, Warrendale, PA/USA; 2005.10.4271/2005-01-0800 ↗
12. Procedure for reliable durability validation of train axles10.1002/mawe.200600086 ↗
13. Railway axle failures and durability validation10.1177/0954409712442325 ↗
14. Effects on lifetime under spectrum loading10.3139/120.110146 ↗
15. Pötter K, Bachmann F. Courtesy of BMW Group, Munich; 2019.
16. Rupp A, Heinrietz A, Ehl O. Simulation of the experimental proof out of wheels and hubs. SAE-Paper No. 2002-01-1202. Warrendale, PA/USA; 2002.10.4271/2002-01-1202 ↗
17. Heinrietz A, Lehrke H.P, Rupp A, Barthel C. Identification of parametric tire models for the fatigue evaluation of suspension components. SAE-Paper No. 2003-01-1276. Warrendale, PA/USA; 2003.10.4271/2003-01-1276 ↗
18. Multiaxial fatigue assessment for automotive safety components of cast aluminium EN AC-42000 T6 (G-AlSi7Mg0.3 T6) under constant and variable amplitude loading
19. Sonsino CM, Dieterich K. Influence of porosity on fatigue strength of cast aluminium alloys. Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability LBF, Darmstadt/Germany, Report No. FB-188; 1990 [in German].
20. Fatigue strength and applications of cast aluminium alloys with different degrees of porosity10.1016/0142-1123(93)90001-7 ↗
21. Overload effects on a ferritic-baintic steel and a cast aluminium alloy: two very different behaviours
22. ANSI/ASTM E155-79: Standard reference radiographs for inspection of aluminium and magnesium castings, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM); 1979.
23. Course of SN-curves especially in the high-cycle fatigue regime with regard to component design and safety10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.015 ↗
24. Ungleichförmige Spannungsverteilung bei schwingender Beanspruchung (Non-homogenous stress distribution under fatigue loading)
25. A relation between theoretical stress concentration factor and fatigue notch factor deduced from the concept of highly stressed volume
26. Zur Bewertung des Schwingfestigkeitsverhaltens von Bauteilen mit Hilfe örtlicher Beanspruchungen (Assessment of fatigue behaviour of components with the aid of local stresses)
27. Grubisic V, Fischer G. Automotive Wheels, Method and Procedure for Optimal Design and Testing. SAE-Paper No. 830135, Warrendale, PA/USA; 1983.10.4271/830135 ↗
28. Fischer G, Grubisic V. Cast aluminum wheels for truck and buses-testing and evaluation. SAE-Paper No. 841705, Warrendale, PA/USA; 1984.10.4271/841705 ↗
29. Fischer G, Grubisic V. Design criteria and durability approval of wheel hubs. SAE-Paper No. 982840. Warrendale, PA/USA; 1998.10.4271/982840 ↗
30. Validation of complex wheel/hub subassemblies by multiaxial laboratory tests using standardized load files10.1520/JAI19035 ↗
31. Fischer G, Grubisic V, Klock J. Computer controlled proof tests of wheels and wheel- hub-assemblies- principle and procedure-, Report No. TB 187. Darmstadt/Germany: Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability LBF; 1989.
32. Haibach E, Ostermann H, Köbler HG. Covering of the risk by coinsidences of few fatigue tests. LBF-Technical Information No. TM 68. Darmstadt/Germany, in German: Fraunhofer Institute for Structural Durability LBF; 1973.
33. Engineering Test Report, Borbet Austria, Report-No. 1003; 2009 [not-published].