Generalization of the Weibull probabilistic compatible model to assess fatigue data into three domains: LCF, HCF and VHCF
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, three classes of fatigue models are reviewed according to the fatigue regimes commonly considered in the current components design. Particular attention is devoted to the so-called Class III fatigue models, covering the three fatigue regimes, namely, LCF, HCF and VHCF. The applicability and limitations of the proposed analytical sigmoidal solutions are discussed from the viewpoint of practical design. The compatible Weibull S-N model by Castillo and Canteli is revisited and improved by considering a new reference parameter GP = E·σM ·(dε/dσ)|M as the driving force alternative to the conventional stress range. In this way, the requirement, σM ≤ σu, according to the real experimental conditions, is fulfilled and the parametric limit number of cycles, N0, recovers its meaning. The probabilistic definition of the model on the HCF and VHCF regimes is maintained and extended to the LCF regime. The strain gradients may be calculated from the monotonic or cyclic stress–strain curve of the material although a direct derivation from the hysteresis loop is recommended. Some Class III fatigue models from the literature and another one improved by the authors are applied to the assessment of one experimental campaign under different stress ratios conditions and the results compared accordingly. Finally, the new probabilistic GP-N field is evaluated. The results confirm the practical confluence of the stress- and the strain-based approaches into a single and advantageous unified methodology.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (85)
Show source-provided references
1. Accuracy of determined S-N curve for constructional steel by selected models10.1111/ffe.13139 ↗
2. Considerations about the existence or non-existence of the fatigue limit: implications on practical design10.1007/s10704-019-00413-6 ↗
3. Castillo · 2009
4. A probabilistic interpretation of the Miner number for fatigue life prediction10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.40 ↗
5. Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue-limit model10.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 ↗
6. The method of maximum likelihood applied to the statistical analysis of fatigue data10.1016/0142-1123(79)90012-4 ↗
7. Spindel JE, Haibach E. Some considerations in the statistical determination of the shape of S-N curves. In: Little RE, Ekwall JC, editors. Statistical analysis of fatigue data. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM Special Technical Publication 744; 1981. p. 89–113.10.1520/STP29330S ↗
8. Fatigue testing under variable amplitude loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.011 ↗
9. Statistical size effect in fatigue properties foe mini-specimens10.3390/ma13102384 ↗
10. On the influence of ultimate number of cycles on lifetime prediction for compression springs manufactured from VDSiCr class spring wire10.3390/ma13143222 ↗
11. Haibach E. Betriebsfestigkeit. Verfahren und Daten zur Bauteilberechnung, VDI_Verlag, Düsseldorf; 1989.
12. Schjive J. Fatigue of structures and materials, Kluwer, Dordrecht; 2001.
13. Conway · 1991
14. Castillo E, Fernández-Canteli A. A statistical model for life-time analysis, Wydawnictwa Politechniki Warszawskiej, Z-84, 5–21. Warshaw; 1986.
15. Basquin OH. The exponential law of endurance tests. In: Proc am soc test mater, vol. 10; 1910. p. 625–30.
16. EN 1993-1-9. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1–9: Fatigue. European Standard. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2003.
17. BS 5400. Steel, concrete and composite bridges-Part 10: Code of practice for fatigue. British standard. London: British Standards Institution; 1980.
18. ASTM STP511. Probabilistic aspect of fatigue—New method for the statistical evaluation of constant stress amplitude fatigue-test results. American Standard. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1972.
19. ASTM STP744. Statistical analysis of fatigue data—Some considerations in the statistical determination of the shape of S-N curves. American Standard. West Conshohocken: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1981.
20. ASTM E739-91. Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life (S-N) and strain-life (e-N) fatigue data. ASTM E739-91; 1998. p. 631–7.
21. DNV. Guidelines for design of wind turbines; 2001.
22. Freudenthal AM, Gumbel EJ. Physical and statistical aspects in fatigue. In: Dryden HJ, Von Kármán TH, editors. Advances in applied mechanics, vol. IV. Cambridge: Academic Press; 1956. p. 116–60.10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70372-7 ↗
23. Bolotin VV. Statistical methods in structural mechanics. San Francisco, CA: Holden Day; 1969.
24. Bolotin VV. Wahrscheinlichkeitsmethoden zur Berechnung von Konstruktionen. Berlin: Verlag für Bauwesen; 1981.
25. Bolotin VV. Mechanics of fatigue. Boca Raton, Fl: Mechanical Engineering Series, CRC; 1999.
26. Estimation of fatigue S-N curves of welded joints using advanced probabilistic approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.12.032 ↗
27. A unified statistical model for S-N fatigue curves10.1111/j.1460-2695.2012.01711.x ↗
28. Duplex S-N fatigue curves: statistical distribution of the transition fatigue life10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.50 ↗
29. The determination of fatigue limit under alternating stress conditions
30. Bastenaire FA. New method for the statistical evaluation of constant stress amplitude fatigue-test results. In: Heller R, editor. Probabilistic aspects of fatigue. West Conshohocken, Pa: ASTM International; 1972. p. 3–22.10.1520/STP35402S ↗
31. Fitting fatigue test data with a novel S-N curve using frequentist and Bayesian interference10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.024 ↗
32. The statistical aspect of fatigue of materials
33. A compatible regression Weibull model for the description of the three-dimensional fatigue σM-N-R field as a basis for cumulative damage approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106596 ↗
34. Nishijima S. Statistical fatigue properties of some heat-treated steels for machine structural use. In: Little RE, Ekwall JC, editors. Statistical analysis of fatigue data. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM STP 744, ASTM; 1981. p. 75–88.10.1520/STP29329S ↗
35. Little · 1975
36. Stüssi · 1955
37. A new function for fatigue curves characterization and its multiple merits10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00082-7 ↗
38. A physical model and constitutive equations for complete characterization of S-N fatigue behavior of metals10.1016/j.actamat.2016.09.001 ↗
39. Mechanical fatigue of polymers: a new approach to characterize the S-N behavior on the basis of macroscopic crack growth mechanism10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.058 ↗
40. An analytical relation between the Weibull and the Basquin laws for smooth and notched specimens and application to constant amplitude fatigue
41. Stress-life for high and low cycle fatigue10.15632/jtam-pl/110126 ↗
42. Castillo · 2004
43. Bogdanoff · 1985
44. A new cumulative damage model, Part 410.1115/1.3153635 ↗
45. A methodology for phenomenological analysis of cumulative damage processes. Application to fatigue and fracture phenomena10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106311 ↗
46. A method for obtaining and analyzing sensitivity data10.1080/01621459.1948.10483254 ↗
47. Dixon WJ. Design and analysis of quantal dose–response experiments (with emphasis on staircase designs). Los Angeles, CA: Dixon Statistical Associates, 1991.
48. British Standard 3518: Methods of fatigue testing: 5: Guide to the application of Statistics, Linford Wood, Milton Keynes, British Standard Institution; 1966.
49. ASM International. Fatigue and fracture. In: ASM handbook, vol. 19. Materials Park, OH: ASM International; 1996.
50. ISO 12107. Metallic materials – fatigue testing – statistical planning and analysis of data - ISO 12107, Test, vol. 2006; 2006.
51. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14801: dentistry—implants—dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants; ISO: Geneve, Switzerland; 2016.
52. Ermüdungsfestigkeit von Konstruktionswerkstoffen bei sehr hohen Schwingspielzahlen (im VHCF- und UHCF-Bereich), Heft 304, FKM Frankfurt am Main; 2009.
53. A critical comparison of two models for assessment of fatigue data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.014 ↗
54. Pascual FG. Planning the fatigue experiments and analyzing fatigue data with the random fatigue-limit model and modified sudden death tests. Retrospective theses and Dissertations, 12229, Iowa State University; 1997.
55. Reliability-based fatigue strength testing by the staircase method
56. Optimized planning and evaluation of dental implant fatigue testing: a specific software application10.3390/biology9110372 ↗
57. On the possible generalizations of the Kitagawa-Takahashi diagram and of the El Haddad equation to finite life10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.12.001 ↗
58. A probabilistic Stüssi function for modelling the S-N curves and its application on specimens made of steel S355J2+N10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.041 ↗
59. Applying the Weibull and Stüssi methods that derive reliable Wöhler curves to historical German Bridges
60. Probabilistic relationships between strain range and loading cycles. Application on ASTM A969 steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105626 ↗
61. Temperature dependence of stress-lifetime fatigue curves10.1046/j.1460-2695.2000.00276.x ↗
62. A generalization of the fatigue Kohout-Věchet model for several fatigue damage parameters10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.009 ↗
63. Probabilistic Weibull methodology for fracture prediction of brittle and ductile materials10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.784.443 ↗
64. Muñiz-Calvente M. The generalized local model: a methodology for probabilistic assessment of fracture under different failure criteria. Doctoral Thesis, University of Oviedo; February, 2017.
65. A methodology for probabilistic prediction of fatigue crack initiation taking into account the scale effect10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.014 ↗
66. Castillo · 1988
67. Castillo E, Hadi AS, Balakrishnan N, Sarabia JM. Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science. New York: Wiley; 2005.
68. Fernández-Canteli A, Przybilla C, Nogal M, López-Aenlle M, Castillo E. ProFatigue: a software program for probabilistic assessment of experimental fatigue data sets. In: Procedia engineering, vol. 74, 17th ICMFM, Verbania, Italy; 25–27 May 2014. p. 236–41.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.255 ↗
69. ProFatigue, University of Cantabria, available on line: https://meteo.uni/temp/castie/Profatigue.html can.es.
70. Morrow J. Fatigue properties of metals. In: Section 3.2 in fatigue design handbook, Pub. No. Ae-4. SAE, Warrendale, Pa; 1968.
71. A general regression model for statistical analysis of strain-life fatigue data10.1016/j.matlet.2008.04.015 ↗
72. Fatigue assessment strategy using Bayesian techniques10.3390/ma12193239 ↗
73. A stress-strain function for the fatigue of materials
74. Correia JAFO. Probabilistic approach for the fatigue behaviour modelling of structural components. PhD Thesis, FEUP, University of Porto; 2015.
75. Local unified probabilistic model for fatigue crack initiation and propagation: application to a notched geometry10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.009 ↗
76. A geometry and temperature dependent regression model for statistical analysis of facture toughness in notched specimens10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107414 ↗
77. Fernández Canteli A, Przybilla C, Correia JAFO, de Jesus AMP, Castillo E. Extending the applicability of probabilistic S-N models to the LCF region using energetic parameters. In: XVI int colloquium on mechanical fatigue of metals, Brno; 2012.
78. Dowling NE. Mean stress effects in stress-life and strain life fatigue. In: Proceedings of fatigue 2004: SAE paper no. 2004-01-2227. SAE International, Warrendale, Pa; 2004.10.4271/2004-01-2227 ↗
79. Dowling NE. Personal communication; April 2015.
80. Niederschlesisch-Märkischen Eisenbahn mit Apparaten zum Messen der Biegung und Verdrehung von Eisenbahn-Wagen-Achsen während der Fahrt, angestellt wurden
81. ASTM E606. Tentative recommended practice for constant-amplitude low-cycle. Fatigue Testing, Annual Book of ASTM; 1977. p. 626-–643.
82. Heitmann · 1983
83. Vormwald M. Anrisslebensdauervorhersage auf der Basis der Swingbruchmechanik für kurze Risse. Dissertation Technische Hochschule Darmstadt; 1989.
84. Correia JAFO, Calvente M, Blasón S, Lesiuk G, Brás IMC, De Jesus AMP. Fatigue life response of P355NL1 steel under uniaxial loading using Kohout-Věchet model. XVIII ICMFM; 2016.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.869 ↗
85. Determination of fatigue life for low probability of failure for different stress levels using 3-parameter Weibull distribution10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106080 ↗