journal article·2021-06

Fatigue failure probability estimation of the 7075-T651 aluminum alloy under multiaxial loading based on the life-dependent material parameters concept

Aleksander Karolczuk, Krzysztof Kluger, Thierry Palin-Luc

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue life prediction under a requested failure probability is essential to the modern engineering design process. Hence, the validation of multiaxial life prediction models is important with regard to not only the median fatigue lives but also their ability to estimate the failure probability. Herein, the concept of life-dependent material parameters is enhanced by introducing the fatigue life scatter assessment methodology. Aiming to analyze the ability of the life-dependent material parameter concept to calculate the failure probability distribution, we verified this concept’s new ability on a set of stress-based fatigue criteria and new experimental results on 7075-T651 aluminum alloy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Taylor · 1997
2. EN 1993-1-9. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-9: Fatigue. Brussels; 2005.
3. Hobbacher · 2018
4. Determination of the fatigue P-S-N curves – a critical review and improved backward statistical inference method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105789 ↗
5. Probabilistic S-N fields based on statistical distributions applied to metallic and composite materials: State of the art10.1177/1687814019870395 ↗
6. A probabilistic model for multiaxial high cycle fatigue10.1111/j.1460-2695.2006.01087.x ↗
7. Estimation of the fatigue strength distribution in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue taking into account the stress-strain gradient effect10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.048 ↗
8. Modelling of stress gradient effect on fatigue life using Weibull based distribution function
9. Application of the weakest link analysis to the area of fatigue design of steel welded joints10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.06.012 ↗
10. Improving with probabilistic and scale features the Basquin linear and bi-linear fatigue models10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104728 ↗
11. Generalized probabilistic model allowing for various fatigue damage variables10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.031 ↗
12. Fatigue assessment of a riveted shear splice based on a probabilistic model10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.004 ↗
13. On the optimal choice of experiments for determination of parameters in multiaxial HCF-criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.024 ↗
14. Piecewise stochastic rainflow counting for probabilistic linear and nonlinear damage accumulation considering loading and material uncertainties10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105842 ↗
15. Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue-limit model10.1080/00401706.1999.10485925 ↗
16. Uncertainty quantification of fatigue S-N curves with sparse data using hierarchical Bayesian data augmentation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105511 ↗
17. Fitting fatigue test data with a novel S-N curve using frequentist and Bayesian inference10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.08.024 ↗
18. Probabilistic relationships between strain range, stress range and loading cycles. Application on ASTM A969 steel
19. A probabilistic fatigue approach for riveted joints using Monte Carlo simulation10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.019 ↗
20. Fatigue reliability assessment of turbine discs under multi-source uncertainties10.1111/ffe.12772 ↗
21. Probabilistic modeling of uncertainties in fatigue reliability analysis of turbine bladed disks10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105912 ↗
22. Socie D, Downing S. Statistical strain-life fatigue analysis, vol. 1–8; 1996. https://doi.org/10.4271/960566.10.4271/960566 ↗
23. A log-normal format for failure probability under LCF: concept, validation and definition of design curve10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.027 ↗
24. Reliability analysis for low cycle fatigue life of the aeronautical engine turbine disc structure under random environment10.1016/j.msea.2004.12.014 ↗
25. Stone · 2013
26. Why the Monte Carlo method is so important today10.1002/wics.1314 ↗
27. Lekou · 2013
28. Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.028 ↗
29. A review of multiaxial fatigue criteria for random variable amplitude loads10.1111/ffe.12619 ↗
30. Evaluation of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria under proportional loading for S355 steel
31. Development of a new simple energy method for life prediction in multiaxial fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.003 ↗
32. Online multiaxial fatigue damage evaluation method by real-time cycle counting and energy-based critical plane criterion
33. An energy-based model to assess multiaxial fatigue damage under tension-torsion and tension-tension loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105858 ↗
34. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue life prediction under random spectrum loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105462 ↗
35. Life prediction in multiaxial high cycle fretting fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105504 ↗
36. Progress in fatigue life calculation by implementing life-dependent material parameters in multiaxial fatigue criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105509 ↗
37. Application of life-dependent material parameters to lifetime calculation under multiaxial constant- and variable-amplitude loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105625 ↗
38. Evaluation of the Fatemi-Socie damage parameter for the fatigue life calculation with application of the Chaboche plasticity model10.1111/ffe.12895 ↗
39. A correction in the algorithm of fatigue life calculation based on the critical plane approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.10.011 ↗
40. Application of life-dependent material parameters to fatigue life prediction under multiaxial and non- zero mean loading10.3390/ma13071587 ↗
41. Analysis of revised fatigue life calculation algorithm under proportional and non-proportional loading with constant amplitude10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.03.027 ↗
42. Application of modern aluminum alloys to aircraft10.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-6 ↗
43. Micromechanisms of multistage fatigue crack growth in a high-strength aluminum alloy10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.009 ↗
44. Microstructural aspects of crack nucleation during cyclic loading of AA7075-T65110.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.11.012 ↗
45. Observations of fatigue crack initiation in 7075–T65110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.003 ↗
46. Microstructure-based multistage fatigue modeling of aluminum alloy 7075–T65110.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.031 ↗
47. Fatigue of 7075–T651 aluminum alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.07.005 ↗
48. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel
49. An explanation on fatigue limit under combined stress10.1299/jsme1958.20.257 ↗
50. A review of critical plane orientations in multiaxial fatigue failure criteria of metallic materials10.1007/s10704-005-1088-2 ↗
51. Non-local stress gradient approach for multiaxial fatigue of defective material10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.005 ↗
52. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion for hard metals10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00075-X ↗
53. Structural integrity assessment of metallic components under multiaxial fatigue: The C-S criterion and its evolution10.1111/ffe.12037 ↗
54. Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life (S-N) and strain-life fatigue data
55. A new function for fatigue curves characterization and its multiple merits10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00082-7 ↗
56. A generalization of the fatigue Kohout-Věchet model for several fatigue damage parameters10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.06.009 ↗
57. Matlab and statistics and machine learning toolbox. R2018b. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States; 2018.
58. New method for the statistical evaluation of constant stress amplitudefatigue-test results
59. Who invented the delta method, really?10.1007/s00283-020-09982-0 ↗
60. On the kolmogorov-smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916 ↗