Failure detection technique under random fatigue loading by machine learning and dual sensing on symmetric structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To avoid the sudden failure of mechanical structures under repeated loading and to supplement conventional methods of managing life time, we propose a failure detection technique under random fatigue loading using machine learning and dual sensing on a symmetric structure. The state of a shackle, which is used to connect the cargo to the hoist efficiently, under fatigue loading was collected using two strain sensors of a dual system. The strains were preprocessed and labeled as normal or abnormal. Logistic regression machine learning was employed to determine the decision boundary line. Then, we gathered the decision boundary lines of each experiment for determining the time of failure, and we verified every experiment with the most conservative decision boundary line. The results indicate that failure was detected before the crack occurred and the time to notice maintenance could be controlled.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fault Detection and Control Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Osgood · 1982
2. Raithby KD. A comparison of predicted and achieved fatigue lives of aircraft structures. Technical Report Technical Note Structures-301, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Ministry of Aviation: London; 1961.
3. Lundberg B. The quantitative statistical approach to the aircraft fatigue problem. In: ICAF Symp full scale testing of aircraft structures, Pergamon Press; 1961. p. 393–412.
4. A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00197-7 ↗
5. A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012 ↗
6. Schwabacher M. A survey of data-driven prognostics. In: Proc. AIAA Infotech@Aerospace conf; 2005. p. 1–5.10.2514/6.2005-7002 ↗
7. Vachtsevanos · 2007
8. Luo J, Namburu M, Pattipati K, Qiao L, Kawamoto M, Chigusa S. Model-based prognostic techniques [maintenance applications]. In: Proc IEEE syst readiness technol conf (AUTOTESTCON); 2003. p. 330–40.
9. Smith G, Schroeder J, Navarro S, Haldeman D. Development of a prognostics and health management capability for the Joint Strike Fighter. In: Proc IEEE syst readiness technol conf (AUTOTESTCON); 1998. p. 676–82.10.1109/AUTEST.1997.643994 ↗
10. Hess A, Calvello G, Frith P. Challenges, issues, and lessons learned chasing the “Big P”: real predictive prognostics – part 1. In: IEEE proc aerosp conf; 2005. p. 3610–9.10.1109/AERO.2005.1559666 ↗
11. Hess A, Calvello G, Frith P, Engel SJ, Hoitsma D. Challenges, issues, and lessons learned chasing the “Big P”: Real predictive prognostics – part 2. In: Proc IEEE aerosp conf; 2006. p. 1–19.10.1109/AERO.2006.1656124 ↗
12. A condition-based maintenance policy for stochastically deteriorating systems10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00148-X ↗
13. Byington C, Roemer M, Kacprzynski G, Galie T. Prognostic enhancements to diagnostic systems for improved condition-based maintenance. In: IEEE proc aerosp conf; 2002.10.1109/AERO.2002.1036120 ↗
14. Bellman · 2010
15. Puterman · 2005
16. Vapnik · 1998
17. Jackson · 1990
18. Bishop · 1996
19. Kasabov · 1996
20. Haykin · 1998
21. Data-driven modelling: some past experiences and new approaches10.2166/hydro.2008.015 ↗
22. Fault tree analysis - state of the art10.1109/TR.1974.5215704 ↗
23. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking10.1109/78.978374 ↗
24. Novel approach to nonlinear/non-gaussian Bayesian state estimation10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0015 ↗
25. Dragomir O, Gouriveau R, Dragomir F, Minca E, Zerhouni N. Review of prognostic problem in condition-based maintenance. In: Proc cont conf ECC; 2009.10.23919/ECC.2009.7074633 ↗
26. Development of dual sensor for prognosticating fatigue failure of mechanical structures10.3795/KSME-A.2016.40.8.721 ↗
27. Baek D, Bae K, Park J, Choi B. Physical-clone-based prognostics of mechanical structures. In: IEEE proc prognostics health manage; 2015.10.1109/ICPHM.2015.7245058 ↗
28. Freedman · 2009 · 128
29. Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables10.1093/biomet/54.1-2.167 ↗
30. The regression analysis of binary sequences10.1111/j.2517-6161.1958.tb00292.x ↗
31. Performance Standard for Overhead Electric Wire Rope Hoists, ASME HST-4; 2016.
32. Series Lifting Equipment – Rules for the Classification of Mechanisms, FEM 9.511; 1986.
33. Series Lifting Equipment - Selection of Lifting and Travel Motors, FEM 9.683; 1995.
34. Murphy · 2012