Influence of surface porosity on fatigue life of additively manufactured ASTM A131 EH36 steel
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The influence of surface porosity on the fatigue life of additively manufactured (AMed) EH36 steel samples via selective laser melting (SLM) was studied in-depth by using a numerical method, which the pores were simulative AM 3D pores. The surface pores in both simplified semi-ellipsoid/spheroid and more realistic triangular shapes were evaluated in the first place. Stress concentration factor Kt analyzed by ABAQUS and fatigue life assessed by FE-SAFE were closely related to the AM 3D pore size, shape, position, orientation as well as their interactions, which confirmed their effects on the crack initiation stage during fatigue testing. The effectiveness of adding a surface finish factor Kt to a smooth surface fatigue model was subjected to internal pore geometry in terms of Kt values ranging from 1 to 5.5. Different algorithms were attempted with the stress-life method giving a higher estimation than a strain-life method while becoming invalid when the stress concentration situation was rather serious (around Kt = 2.5). There was no much difference between the uniaxial and multi-axial fatigue algorithms because the uniaxial tensile cyclic loading was applied to the model. Theoretically calculated total fatigue life (crack propagation) using linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) fell in the same order as the experimental results for all the samples (within a factor of 2). AMed material parameters were used for the fatigue life prediction where the microstructure element was counted. AMed pores could deteriorate the mechanical properties of the AMed materials a lot, such as strength, Young’s modulus and fatigue lifetime, etc. The statistical analysis showed the scatter band of the SN curves at a factor of 8 with respect to different laser scanning speeds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue damage and crack growth in aluminium alloys10.1016/0001-6160(63)90008-7 ↗
2. Suresh · 2003
3. Microstructure-based fatigue modeling of cast A356-T6 alloy Engineering Fracture
4. Wang JJ, Zhang M, Tan XP, Liu T, Bi GJ, Li H, Tor SB, Liu E. Fatigue behavior of ASTM A131 EH36 steel samples additively manufactured with selective laser melting, Mater Sci Eng A 2020;777:139049.10.1016/j.msea.2020.139049 ↗
5. Beden SM, Abdullah S, Ariffin AK Rahman MM. Fatigue life assessment of different steel-based shell materials under variale amplitude loading, Eur J Sci Res 2009;29(ISSN 1450-216X):157–169.
6. Fatigue of 8630 cast steel in the presence of porosity10.1179/136404604225020588 ↗
7. Cyclic plasticity at pores and inclusions in cast Al–Si alloys10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00097-8 ↗
8. The fatigue behaviors of butt welds ground flush in the super-long life regime10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.009 ↗
9. X-ray computed tomography vs. metallography for pore sizing and fatigue of cast Al-alloys10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.059 ↗
10. Experimental and numerical study of the effects of porosity on fatigue crack initiation of HPDC magnesium AM60B alloy10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.03.008 ↗
11. Strain-controlled fatigue properties of steels and some simple approximation10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00026-8 ↗
12. 2003 · 4
13. Mechanisms of fatigue-crack propagation in ductile and brittle solids10.1023/A:1018655917051 ↗
14. Simulation of low cycle fatigue with abaqus-FEA
15. Hardin · 2007
16. Fatigue life prediction model for laser clad AISI 4340 specimens with multiple surface cracks10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.01.025 ↗
17. Predictive models for fatigue property of laser powder bed fusion stainless steel 316L10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.054 ↗
18. Fatigue Behavior and Modeling of Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Including Interlayer Time Interval Effects10.1007/s11837-017-2625-y ↗
19. Assessment of the effect of isolated porosity defects on the fatigue performance of additive manufactured titanium alloy
20. Fatigue Strength Prediction for Titanium Alloy TiAl6V4 Manufactured by Selective Laser Melting10.1007/s11661-015-2864-x ↗
21. Fatigue life of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V in the very high cycle fatigue regime10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.018 ↗
22. Effects of Defects in Laser Additive Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V on Fatigue Properties10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.120 ↗
23. Computed tomography for characterization of fatigue performance of selective laser melted parts10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.063 ↗
24. Improvement of densification and microstructure of ASTM A131 EH36 steel samples additively manufactured via selective laser melting with varying laser scanning speed and hatch spacing10.1016/j.msea.2019.01.019 ↗
25. Fatigue assessment of nodular cast iron with material imperfections10.4271/2017-01-0344 ↗
26. Study of the Effect of Shrinkage Porosity on Strength Low Carbon Cast Steel10.1088/1757-899X/91/1/012022 ↗
27. Effect of shrinkage porosity on mechanical properties of ferritic ductile iron
28. Mahendran M. The modulus of elasticity of steel - is it 200 GPa. In: 13th International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures; 1996.
29. A study of compatibility between two classical fatigue curve models based on some selected structural materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.03.002 ↗
30. Volume 2 - Fesafe Fatigue theory reference manual-MIT, https://abaqus-docs.mit.edu/2017/English/FesafePdf/FesafeFatigueTheory.pdf.
31. Yang Z. The effect of porosity on fatigue crack initiation and propagation in AM60 Die-cast magnesium alloy, master thesis, McMaster University, Materials Science and Engineering; 2015.
32. A Review on Development and Application of Probabilistic Fatigue Life Prediction Models for Metal Materials and Components
33. Material defects as the basis of fatigue design10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.001 ↗
34. Fukuta Y, Asada S, Kanasaki H, Sera T. Proposal of surface finish factor on fatigue strength in design fatigue curve. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2014 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (July 20-24, 2014, Anaheim, California, USA).10.1115/PVP2014-28601 ↗
35. Forman · 1986 · 59
36. https://www.efatigue.com/smalldefect/analysis/#a.
37. Fatigue Life Prediction Based on Crack Growth Analysis Using an Equivalent Initial Flaw Size Model: Application to a Notched Geometry10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.018 ↗
38. Kitagawa · 1976 · 627
39. Kitagawa-Takahashi diagrams define the limiting conditions for cyclic fatigue failure in human dentin10.1002/jbm.a.30939 ↗
40. A phenomenological model of fatigue macrocrack initiation near stress concentrators10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00098.x ↗
41. Walsh WJ, Leis BN, Yung JY. Influence of weld porosity on the integrity of marine structures. Ship Structure Committee; 1990.