Re-evaluation of weld root fatigue strength for load-carrying fillet welded joints using the notch stress concept
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The re-evaluation of fatigue strength, applying nominal and notch stress concepts has been carried out, using extracted experimental fatigue data for load-carrying fillet welded joints failing from weld root. Various reference radii, including rref = 1 mm, rref = 0.5 mm, and rref = 0.3 mm are applied to investigate an appropriate reference radius for assessing fatigue strength of weld root using the effective notch stress concept. In addition, a new FAT class with modified slope is proposed to improve the accuracy of the current recommended class for thin joints with rref = 0.3 mm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Weld detail fatigue life improvement techniques. Part 1: review10.1016/S0951-8339(99)00013-1 ↗
2. Hot-Spot Stress Design Curves For Fatigue Assessment of Welded Structures
3. A fatigue strength evaluation method for load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.10.004 ↗
4. Review of fatigue strength assessment of nonwelded and welded structures based on local parameters10.1016/0142-1123(95)00117-4 ↗
5. Radaj · 2006
6. Radaj · 1990
7. Fatigue strength assessment of scallops—an example for the application of nominal and local stress approaches10.1016/0951-8339(94)00029-R ↗
8. C. E. N. Eurocode, “9: Design of aluminium structures-Part 1-3: Structures susceptible to fatigue,” 1999.
9. Nussbaumer · 2012
10. Fatigue strength capacity of load-carrying fillet welds on ultra-high-strength steel plates subjected to out-of-plane bending10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109282 ↗
11. Weld root fatigue assessment of fillet-welded structures based on structural stresses
12. J. D. Sørensen, J. Tychsen, J. U. Andersen, and R. D. Brandstrup, “Fatigue analysis of load-carrying fillet welds,” 2006.10.1115/1.2163876 ↗
13. Fatigue strength assessment of TIG-dressed welded steel joints by local approaches10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.04.038 ↗
14. Fatigue assessment of welded joints using stress averaging and critical distance approaches10.1007/s40194-015-0248-x ↗
15. Critical distance approach for the fatigue strength assessment of magnesium welded joints in contrast to Neuber’s effective stress method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.004 ↗
16. Fricke · 2012
17. A Consideration of Allowable Equivalent Stresses for Fatigue Design of Welded Joints According to the Notch Stress Concept with the Reference Radii rref = 1.00 and 0.05 mm10.1007/BF03266705 ↗
18. Hobbacher · 2016
19. Fatigue design of aluminium welded joints by the local stress concept with the fictitious notch radius of rf=1mm10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.10.006 ↗
20. Über die Berücksichtigung der Spannungskonzentration bei Festigkeitsberechnungen [About the consideration of the stress concentration in strength assessments]
21. Application of Neuber’s effective stress method for the evaluation of the fatigue behaviour of magnesium welds10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.023 ↗
22. Re-analysis of fatigue data for welded joints using the notch stress approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.001 ↗
23. Evaluation of nominal and local stress based approaches for the fatigue assessment of seam welds10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.06.002 ↗
24. Verification of FAT Values for the Application of the Notch Stress Concept with the Reference Radii R ref= 1.00 and 0.05 mm10.1007/BF03263507 ↗
25. Fatigue design of welded joints from the wrought magnesium alloy AZ31 by the local stress concept with the fictitious notch radii of rf=1.0 and 0.05mm10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.017 ↗
26. Fatigue Design Values for Welded Joints of the Wrought Magnesium Alloy AZ31 (ISO-MgAI3Zn1) According to the Nominal, Structural and Notch Stress Concepts in Comparison to Welded Steel and Aluminium Connections10.1007/BF03266643 ↗
27. Consideration of mean-stress effects on fatigue life of welded magnesium joints by the application of the Smith–Watson–Topper and reference radius concepts10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.007 ↗
28. S-N Lines for Welded Thin Joints — Suggested Slopes and FAT Values for Applying the Notch Stress Concept with Various Reference Radii10.1007/BF03266752 ↗
29. Review and considerations on the fatigue assessment of welded joints using reference radii10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.013 ↗
30. On the use of a fictitious notch radius equal to 0.3 mm to design against fatigue welded joints made of wrought magnesium alloy AZ3110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105747 ↗
31. Experimental investigation on the fatigue strength assessment of welded joints made of S1100 ultra-high-strength steel in as-welded and post-weld treated condition
32. Application of local approaches to the assessment of fatigue test results obtained for welded joints at sub-zero temperatures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105672 ↗
33. W. Sundermeyer, W. Fricke, and H. Paetzold, “Investigation of weld root fatigue of single-sided welded T-joints,” Anal. Des. Mar. Struct. V, vol. 309, 2015.
34. Investigation on fatigue behaviour of load-carrying fillet welded joints based on mix-mode crack propagation analysis10.1016/j.acme.2017.01.009 ↗
35. Data sheets on fatigue properties for load-carrying cruciform welded joints of SM50B rolled steel for welded structure (Effect of specimen size)
36. Fatigue Life Evaluation of Fillet Welded Cruciform Joints with Load-Carrying Welds10.1007/s12666-015-0822-3 ↗
37. Frank · 1971
38. Fatigue strength evaluation of load-carrying cruciform fillet-welded joints made with mild steel plates of different thickness10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.002 ↗
39. Fatigue life prediction of gas tungsten arc welded AISI 304L cruciform joints with different LOP sizes10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00067-1 ↗
40. On the Fatigue Strength of Steels for Ship Structure
41. A study on fatigue crack initiation point of load-carrying fillet welded cruciform joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.003 ↗
42. Fatigue assessment of steel load-carrying cruciform welded joints by means of local approaches10.1111/ffe.12870 ↗
43. Evaluation of Fatigue Strength of Load-Carrying Cruciform Welded Joint under Combination of Axial Loading and Out-of-Plane Bending
44. Fatigue strength of cruciform joints and longitudinal joints with laser-arc hybrid welding10.1007/s40194-019-00745-w ↗
45. Fatigue strength of fillet-welded joints at subzero temperatures10.1111/ffe.13163 ↗
46. Low-and high-cycle fatigue behaviour of load-carrying cruciform joints containing incomplete penetration and strength mismatch10.1007/BF03321357 ↗
47. “Assessment of fatigue strength of cruciform welded joints failing from weld roots under out-of-plane bending”, Doboku Gakkai Ronbunshuu A/JSCE
48. Fatigue strength assessment of load-carrying cruciform joints with material mismatching in low-and high-cycle fatigue regions based on the effective notch concept10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.016 ↗
49. Fatigue analysis of manufacturing defects in weldments10.1016/0142-1123(86)90053-8 ↗
50. B. S. EN, “1-9: 2005, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures----Part 1-9: Fatigue,” Br. Stand. Inst., 2005.
51. G. L. DNV, “DNVGL-RP-C203: Fatigue Design of Offshore Steel Structures, no,” DNVGL-RPC203, 2016.
52. Guide to fatigue design and assessment of steel products
53. Effect of Weld Quality and Postweld Improvement Techniques on the Fatigue Resistance of Extra High Strength Steels10.1007/BF03266658 ↗
54. IIW guideline for the assessment of weld root fatigue10.1007/s40194-013-0066-y ↗
55. Applicability of effective notch stress conception to fatigue strength evaluation for cruciform welded joints failing from weld root
56. Jonsson · 2016
57. Mechanical behavior of materials: engineering methods for deformation, fracture, and fatigue