Increase wind gearbox power density by means of IGS (Improved Gear Surface)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. .ISO6336, International Standard: Calculation of load capacity of spur and helical gears. Part 2:2019, Part 3:2006 and Part 5: 2016.
2. AGMA 938-A05, American Gear Manufacturer Association: Shot Peening of Gears, 2005.
3. SAE AMS 2432D, Shot Peening, Computer Monitored, 2013.
4. J2441_201506, Shot Peening, 2015.
5. ISO4288, Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Surface Texture, 1996.
6. ASTM E 975-13, Standard Practice for X-Ray Determination of Retained Austenite in Steel with Near Random Crystallographic Orientation, 2013.
7. EN 15305, Test method for residual stress analysis by X-ray diffraction, 2009.
8. ISO 6507-1, Metallic materials — Vickers hardness test —Part 1: Test method, 2018.
9. Inoue, Katsumi, Maehara, Toshiyuki, Yamanaka, Masashi, Kato, Masana Effect of shot peening on the bending strength of carburized gear teeth (1989) JSME international journal DOI: 10.1299/jsmec1988.32.449.10.1299/jsmec1988.32.448 ↗
10. Lawerenz, M., Ekis, I. Guidelines for establishing an optimum shot peening specification for gearing (1989) SAE Technical Papers. DOI: 10.4271/891934.10.4271/891933 ↗
11. Townsend, Dennis P. Improvement in surface fatigue life of hardened gears by high-intensity shot peening (1992) American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Design Engineering Division.10.1115/DETC1992-0082 ↗
12. Surface fatigue lives of case-carburized gears with an improved surface finish10.1115/1.1387036 ↗
13. Winkelmann, L., Omer, E.-S., Bell, M.The effect of superfinishing on gear micropitting, part II, 2008. American Gear Manufacturers Association - American Gear Manufacturers Association Fall Technical Meeting 2008.
14. Influence of shot peening on bending tooth fatigue limit of case-hardened gears10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00034-8 ↗
15. Abudaia, F.B., Evans, J.T., Shaw, B.A. Characterization of retained austenite in case carburized gears and its influence on fatigue performance (2003) Gear Technology.
16. Shaw, B.A., Aylott, C., O'Hara, P., Brimble, K.The role of residual stress on the fatigue strength of high performance gearing (2003) International Journal of Fatigue DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.015.10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.014 ↗
17. Herring, D.H. A discussion of retained austenite (2005) Industrial Heating.
18. Saoki Masumura, Naoji HamasakaHigh Stregth and Compactness of Gears by WHSP (Double Hard Shot Peening) Technology(2006) Technical Paper, Komtsu Technical report.
19. Stenico A.Werkstoffmechanische Untersuchungen zur Zahnfußtragfähigkeit einsatzgehärteter Zahnräder [eng.: Material-mechanical investigations of the tooth root load carrying capacity of case-hardened gears ].(2007) Dissertation, Technical University of Munich.
20. Masatoshi Yoshizaki Improvement in tooth surface strength of carburized transmission gears by fine particle bombarding process (2007) Transactions of the japan society of mechanical engineers Series C 73 DOI: 10.1299/kikaic.73.1924.10.1299/kikaic.73.1923 ↗
21. Koller, P., Optimierung Flankentragfähigkeit, Forschungsvorhaben, 2010. Project Nr. 521 I (IGF-Nr. 14908 N). FVA-magazine Nr. 957, Frankfurt am Main.
22. Investigations on tooth root bending strength of case-hardened gears in the range of high cycle fatigue
23. The impact of surface condition and lubricant on gear tooth friction
24. Koenig, J., Koller, P., Tobie, T., Stahl, K. Correlation of relevant case properties and the flank load carrying capacity of case-hardened gears (2015) Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference DOI: 10.1115/DETC201546300.10.1115/DETC2015-46299 ↗
25. Güntner, C., Tobie, T., Stahl, K. Influences of the residual condition on the load carrying capacity of case hardened gears (2017) American Gear Manufacturers Association Fall Technical Meeting 2017.
26. Koenig, J., Koller, P., Tobie, T., Stahl, K. Influence of additional surface finishing to the material properties and the flank load carrying capacity of case-hardened gears with grinding burn (2017) Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems and Manufacturing DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2017jamdsm0075.10.1299/jsmeimpt.2017.05-08 ↗
27. König, J., T. Tobie and K. Stahl. Optimized flank load carrying capacity II, Load capacity of shot peened and superfinished gear flanks under considerations of the case properties and the lubrication condition (in German).(2017) Project Nr. 521 II (AiF-Nr. 17145),FVA-magazine Nr. 1245, Frankfurt am Main.
28. Güntner, C., Tobie, T., Stahl, K.Alternative microstructures and their influence on mechanical properties of case-hardened gears (2017) Forschung im Ingenieurwesen/Engineering Research DOI: 10.1007/s10010-017-0222-5.10.51202/9783181022948-399 ↗
29. Experimental Investigation of Shot Peening on Case Hardened SS2506
30. Flank fracture assessment under consideration of material quality
31. Ghribi, D., Peyrac, C., Octrue, M. Shot peening of gear tooth flanks: Search for an optimal surface topography against the micropitting, 2017 VDI Berichte, 2017 (2294), pp. 1530-1539.10.51202/9783181022948-153 ↗
32. Wagner, M., Isaacson, A., Michaud, M., Bell, M.A comparison of surface roughness measurement methods for gear tooth working surfaces, 2019. AGMA 2019 Fall Technical Meeting.
33. Fuchs · Forsch Ingenieurwes · 2019 · 83 · 57910.1007/s10010-019-00324-x ↗
34. Winkler, K.J., Güntner, C., Tobie, T., Stahl, K., Schurer, S.Material properties and tooth root bending strength of shot blasted, case carburized gears with alternative microstructures, 2019. AGMA 2019 Fall Technical Meeting, FTM 2019.
35. Effects of low-temperature treatments on surface hardness, retained austenite content, residual stress condition and the resulting tooth root bending strength of case-hardened 18CrNiMo7-6 gears10.1177/0954406219846160 ↗
36. Investigations on the tooth root bending strength and the fatigue fracture characteristics of case-carburized and shot-peened gears of different sizes10.1177/0954406219841650 ↗
37. J. Hoffmeister, J. Hermes Optimized tooth root strength by controlled shot peening, 2019. International Conference on Gears 2019 DOI: 10.51202/9783181023556-138.10.51202/9783181023556-137 ↗
38. Kratzer, D., Konig, J., Tobie, T., Stahl, K.Effects of different shot peening treatment s in combination with a superfinishing process on the surface durability of case-hardened gears (2020) 2020 AGMA/ABMA Annual Meeting.
39. Jean-Andre Meis A finite element based assessment concept for the tooth root strength of gears in wind turbines, 2021. CWD 2021.
40. ISO 4287:1997, GEOMETRICAL PRODUCT SPECIFICATION (GPS) – SURFACE TEXTURE, 1997.
41. Winkelmann, L., Michaud, M., Stroka, G., Swiglo, A.A. Impact of isotropic superfinishing on contact and bending fatigue of carburized steel (2002) SAE Technical Papers DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-1392.10.4271/2002-01-1391 ↗
42. SAE AMS 2430U, Shot Peening, 2018.