journal article·2018-12

Developing an accelerated flight load spectrum based on the n-N curves of a fleet

Xiaofan He, Tang Li, Yuhai Li, Yinghao Dong, Tianshuai Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue load spectra are essential for fatigue analyses and full-scale fatigue testing (FSFT) of aircraft structures. Because of the long test period, an accelerated load spectrum is required to reduce time consumption and cost. This paper presents a new approach for developing an accelerated flight load spectrum. Using the measured nz-N curves per flight for a Fokker F27 fleet, 55 individual load spectra were reconstructed, the damage of which was calculated using the damage curve method, and verification was conducted using fatigue tests on 2024-T3 aluminum alloy centered-hole specimens. A lognormal distribution function was used to model the variation in the load spectrum damage per flight for the fleet. Assuming that the structural property variation follows a lognormal distribution, the fleet life is found to follow a lognormal distribution with the mean equal to that including the load spectrum variation and the variance equal to the sum of the variance in structural properties and load spectra. Then, we obtained the damage severity of the accelerated load spectrum that meets the reliability requirements for fleet life. The nz-N curve of the accelerated spectrum was subsequently determined based on statistical analysis and probability extrapolation of the exceedance number. Finally, an accelerated flight load spectrum was developed based on the nz-N curve, the damage severity of which was determined by fatigue analysis and testing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. F.A.A. Regulations, Part 25 – Airworthiness standard: Transport category airplane, FAA, FAR 25; 2008.
2. Fatigue life prediction of aircraft structures—past, present and future10.1016/0013-7944(74)90071-X ↗
3. Potter J, Watanabe R, editors. Development of fatigue loading spectra, ASTM STP 1006; 1989.10.1520/STP1006-EB ↗
4. Fatigue of structures and materials in the 20th century and the state of the art10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00051-3 ↗
5. Abelkis P, Potter JM, editors. Service fatigue loads monitoring, simulation, and analysis: a symposium, ASTM STP 671; 1979.10.1520/STP671-EB ↗
6. Gust and maneuver spectra for general aviation aircraft
7. The new FAA flight loads monitoring program
8. Monitoring load experience of individual aircraft10.2514/3.46407 ↗
9. Aktepe B, Molent L. Management of airframe fatigue through individual aircraft loads monitoring programs. In: International Aerospace Congress, Adelaide; 1999.
10. The analysis of random load-time histories with relation to fatigue tests and life calculations
11. Matsuishi M, Endo T. Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress – Fatigue lives under random loading. In: Preliminary Proc. of the Kyushu District Meeting, Japan Soc. of Mech. engineers; 1968. p. 37–40 (in Japanese).
12. Standardization of the rainflow counting method for fatigue analysis10.1016/0142-1123(94)90343-3 ↗
13. Modified rainflow counting keeping the load sequence10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00078-9 ↗
14. ASTM E 1049-85, Standard practices for cycle counting in fatigue analysis; 2017.
15. Sandlin · 1979 · 144
16. Fatigue loading history reconstruction based on the rainflow technique10.1016/0142-1123(90)90679-9 ↗
17. Corrosion and fatigue research—structural issues and relevance to naval aviation10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00115-3 ↗
18. Schütz · 1969
19. De Jong JB, Schütz D, Lowak H, Schijve J. A standardized load sequence for flight simulation tests on transport aircraft wing structures, National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam, NLR-TR 73029 U; 1973.
20. Van Dijk GM, de Jonge JB. Introduction to a fighter aircraft loading standard for fatigue evaluation FALSTAFF. In: Proceedings of 8th ICAF symposium, international committee on aeronautical fatigue, Lausanne, Switzerland; 1975. p. 3.61/1–3.61/39.
21. Schütz · 1989 · 3
22. Fowler · 1989 · 36
23. Fatigue spectra development for airborne stores
24. Generation and use of standardised load spectra and load–time histories10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.09.012 ↗
25. Evaluation of small cycle omission criteria for shortening of fatigue service histories10.1016/0142-1123(79)90041-0 ↗
26. Effect of spectrum editing on fatigue crack initiation and propagation in a notched member
27. A criterion for omission of variable amplitude loading histories10.1016/0142-1123(86)90025-3 ↗
28. Fatigue damage editing for accelerated durability testing using strain range and SWT parameter criteria10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00079-0 ↗
29. Experimental investigation on the small-load-omitting criterion10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00005-6 ↗
30. A small-load-omitting criterion based on probability fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.04.014 ↗
31. Effect of loading spectrum clipping and truncation on fatigue crack growth behavior of 7475–T7351 aluminum alloy under variable amplitude loading10.1016/j.proeng.2015.02.027 ↗
32. Lameris J. The use of load enhancement factors in the certification of composite aircraft structures. NLR TP 90068; 1990.
33. Bent L. The effects of two-stage loading on the fatigue life of titanium alloy lugs. In: BAE commercial aircraft division; 1990.
34. Betriebsfestigkeit in Germany—an overview10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00180-3 ↗
35. Vallat · 1961 · 278
36. Benoy M. Fatigue life variation in civil aircraft. In: 11th Symposium of the international committee on aeronautical fatigue, National aerospace laboratory, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands; 1981.
37. De Jonge J, Hol P. Variation in load factor experience of Fokker F27 and F28 operational acceleration exceedance data, Department of Transportation, Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-96/114, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.; 1996.
38. Cardrick AW, Mew AB. Scatter considerations in the interpretation of major fatigue tests. In: Rudd JL, Bader RM, editors. Structural integrity for the next millenium. Proceedings of the 20th ICAF Symposium, vol. II, Seattle, USA; 1999.
39. Jiang · 2012
40. Benoy M. A review of fatigue scatter factors with particular reference to civil aircraft. In: Civil Aviation Authority of Australia; 1978.
41. Simulation of load sequences from rainflow matrices: Markov method10.1016/0142-1123(96)80001-Z ↗
42. A neural network approach to the simulation of load histories by considering the influence of a sequence of rainflow load cycles10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00033-6 ↗
43. Development of fatigue loading spectra from flight test data10.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.411 ↗
44. A concept of fatigue damage
45. Anon, Chinese handbook of aeronautical materials Vol. 3: Aluminum alloy, magnesium alloy and titanium alloy, China Standards Press, Beijing; 1989 (in Chinese).
46. Hines · 2008
47. Fatigue predictions and scatter10.1111/j.1460-2695.1994.tb00239.x ↗
48. Detemination of the fatigue resistance of aircraft wings by Full-Scale Testing
49. Parish H. Fatigue test results and analysis of 42 piston Provost wings to determine the effect of order of programmed load, in British Aircraft Corp Ltd London (England), G.B. Scient. Tech. Memo. no; 1968 5/67.
50. Interpreting fatigue test results using a probabilistic fracture approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.006 ↗
51. Reyer WM. Probability basis of safe-life evaluations in small airplanes. In: Ninth joint FAA/DoD/NASA aging aircraft conference, Atlanta, GA; 2006. Retrieved from .