Fatigue life prediction of welded joints from nominal system to fracture mechanics
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents methods for determining the fatigue life of welded joints with particular emphasis on typical joints. Possible methods for computational determination of the stresses in welded joints are shown, starting with those based on nominal stresses according to different proposals, through structural stresses, including the ‘hot spot’ type, to the most complicated linear fracture mechanics. With this background, the recommendations of the International Institute of Welding (IIW) for determining the fatigue life of welded steel joints of flat components under uniaxial tensile–compression conditions are presented. The paper focuses on the problem of determining and evaluating the fatigue life of selected types of welded joints in accordance with the guidelines of the IIW and the safety analysis of welded structures. The study shows the extent to which the simplest method based on the amplitude of nominal stress can be used for calculating fatigue life based on two selected types of joints with different asymmetry coefficients, R = −1 and 0, and joints without geometrical notch. The analysis was based on steel welded joints of four different materials. The results show that the FAT characteristics are always good except for the FAT 90 category, where, for a lower fatigue life, we approach a dangerous fatigue life estimation. For K-type cruciform joints, the FAT model can be used for all the stress ratios. In other cases, such compliance cannot be accepted. For the category FAT 90 X-type butt joints, a new category FAT '134 and a new slope, m = 5, are proposed. For type X butt joints without notch, the slope m = 12 and a new category FAT' 525 are proposed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Engineering Structural Analysis Methods
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Radaj D, Sonsino CM, Fricke W. Fatigue assessment of welded joints by local approachesm, 2nd ed. Woodhead Publishing; 2006. ps.660.10.1533/9781845691882 ↗
2. A parametric fracture mechanics study of the effect of cold lap defect on fatigue strength
3. Chaturvedi M, editor. Welding and joining of aerospace materials, 2nd ed., Woodhead Publishing; 2020. ps.560.
4. Macdonald K. Fracture and fatigue of welded joints and structures. Woodhead Publishing; 2011. ps.360.10.1533/9780857092502 ↗
5. Lindgren LE. Computational welding mechanics. Woodhead Publishing; 2007. ps.248.10.1533/9781845693558 ↗
6. Niemi · 2006
7. Łagoda · 2008
8. Fatigue analysis of welded joints: state of development10.1016/S0951-8339(02)00075-8 ↗
9. Review of fatigue strength assessment of nonwelded and welded structures based on local parameters10.1016/0142-1123(95)00117-4 ↗
10. Fatigue in steel structures under random loading10.1016/S0143-974X(99)00042-5 ↗
11. On the fatigue behaviour and design curves of friction stir butt-welded Al alloys10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.06.013 ↗
12. Review of fatigue assessment procedures for welded aluminum structures10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00063-X ↗
13. Niemi E. Aspects of good design practice for fatigue-loaded welded components. Fatigue design. ESIS 16. In: Solin J, Marquis G, Siljander A, Sipila S, editors. London: Mechanical Engineering Publications; 1993. p. 333–51.
14. Fustar B, Lukacevíc I, Dujmovíc D. Review of fatigue assessment methods for welded steel structures. Adv Civ Eng 2018. ps.16 [article ID 3597356].10.1155/2018/3597356 ↗
15. Review of the fatigue strength of welded joints based on the notch stress intensity factor and SED approaches10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.11.015 ↗
16. Review and considerations on the fatigue assesment of welded joints using reference radii10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.013 ↗
17. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurzyce [access: year 2007].
18. Varvounis · 2016
19. Fatigue strength of shear loaded welded joints according to the local concept10.1002/1521-4052(200104)32:4<287::AID-MAWE287>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
20. Hobbacher A. Recomendations for fatigue design of welded joint and components. IIW dokument XIII-2151-07/XV-1254-07; May 2007.
21. Basic philosophy of the new IIW recommendations on fatigue design of welded joints and components
22. The new IIW recommendations for fatigue assessment of welded joins and components – a comprehensive code recently updated10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.04.002 ↗
23. Nussbaumer AC. Course on fatigue and fracture mechanics, Document submitted in fulfillment of Article 8, Alinea c) from Portugase, DEcreto Lei no 239/2007; 2008. ps.32.
24. Consideration of mean-stress effects on fatigue life of welded magnesium joints by application of the Smith-Watson-Topper and reference radius conepts10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.007 ↗
25. S-N lines for welded thin joints – suggested slopes and FAT values for applying the notch stress concept with various reference radi
26. Neimitz A. Mechanika Pękania, PWN Warszawa, s. 434; 1998 [in Polish].
27. German J. Podstawy Mechaniki Pękania, Skrypt dla studentów wyższych szkół technicznych. Kraków: Politechnika Krakowska; 2005 [in Polish].
28. Goss Cz, Kłysz S, Wojnowski W. Problemy niskocyklowej trwałości zmęczeniowej wybranych stali i połączeń spawanych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych; 2004. s.154 [in Polish].
29. Susmel L, Tovo R. Modified Wöhler curve method and Eurocode 3: Accuracy in predicting the multiaxial fatigue strength of welded joints. p. 203–7.
30. Fatigue assessment of welded structures: practical aspects for stress analysis and fatigue assessment10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01506.x ↗
31. Martinsson J. Fatigue assessment of complex welded steel structure. Division of Lightweight Structures Department Aeronautical and Vehicle Engineering Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 Stockholm, TRITA-AVE, vol. 02; 2005 [ISBN 91-2783-968-6].
32. Dang Van K, Bignonnet A, Fayard JL. Assessment of welded structures by a structural multiaxial fatigue approach. In: Carpinteri A, de Freitas M, Spagnoli A, editors. Biaxial/Multiaxial Fatigue Fracture. Elsevier; 2003. p. 3–21.10.1016/S1566-1369(03)80002-X ↗
33. Niemi E. Structural stress approach to fatigue analysis of welded components – designer’s guide. IIIW-Doc. XIII-1819-00/XV-1091-01 (Final Draft). International Institute of Welding; 2001.
34. Niemi · 1995
35. Sonsino CM, Kaufmann H, Demofonti G, Riscifuli S, Sedlacek G, Müller C, et al. High-strength steels in welded state for light-weight constructions under high and variable stress peaks. ECSC steel research programme. CSM – Roma, LBF – Darmstadt; 1999.
36. Assessment of multiaxial fatigue behaviour of welded joints under bending and torsion by application of a fictitious radius10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00143-9 ↗
37. Seeger · 1996
38. Neuber · 1985
39. Neuber · 1968 · 245
40. Labesse-Jied · 2003 · 43
41. A consideration of allowable equivalent stresses for fatigue design of welded joints according to the notch stress concept with the reference radi rref=1.00 and 0.05 mm10.1007/BF03266705 ↗
42. Fatigue design of welded joints from the wrought magnesium alloy AZ31 by the local stress concept with the fictitious notch radii of rf=1.0 and 0.05 mm10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.017 ↗
43. Fatigue design values for welded joints of the wrought magnesium alloy AZ31 (ISO-MgAI3Zn1) according to the nominal, structural and notch stress concepts in comparison to welded steel and aluminium connections10.1007/BF03266643 ↗
44. Application of Neuber’s effective stress method for the evaluation of the fatigue behaviour of magnesium welds10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.023 ↗
45. Fatigue strength assessment of laser welded thin-walled joints made of mild and high strength steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.016 ↗
46. Critical distance approach for the fatigue strength assessment of magnesium welded joints in contrast to Neuber’s effective stress method10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.004 ↗
47. Fictitious notch rounding concept applied to V-notches with end holes under mode 3 loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.12.008 ↗
48. Lawrence · 1978 · 134
49. A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joint10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.001 ↗
50. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-1: General rules for buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardisation; 1992 [ENV 1993-1-1].
51. A numerical approach to fatigue assessment of spot weld joints10.1111/j.1460-2695.2010.01488.x ↗
52. Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures – Part 2: Structures susceptible to fatigue. Brussels; 1998 [ENV 1999-2].
53. Sędek P. Projektowanie konstrukcji narażonych na zmęczenie w ujęciu normy PN-EN 1993-1-9, Seminarium Pt. Zagadnienia wytrzymałości zmęczeniowej konstrukcji spawanych – projektowanie, wykonawstwo, badania, Instytut Spawalnictwa. Gliwice; 2007 [in Polish].
54. BS 7608:1993 Code of practice for fatigue design and assessment of steel structures. London: BSI; 1993.
55. Fatigue design recommendations for steel structures by Japanese Society of Steel Construction (JSSC). Technical Report No. 32. Tokyo: JSSC; 1995.
56. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials AASHTO. LRFD bridge design specifications, 2nd ed.; 1998.
57. Swedish Regulations for Welded Steel Structures. STBK-N2. National Swedish Committee for Steel Structures; 1974.
58. Effect of residual stresses on the fatigue behaviour of welded joints depending on loading conditions and weld geometry10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.015 ↗
59. ASTM E 739-91 (1998). Standard practice for statistical analysis of linearized stress-life (S-N) and strain life (ε – N) fatigue data. In: Annual book of ASTM standards, vol. 03.01, Philadelphia; 1999.