Role of geometrically necessary dislocation density in multiaxial and non-proportional fatigue crack nucleation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Experimental and crystal plasticity modelling studies have been carried out to investigate non-proportionality and stress state effects in fatigue in a 316 stainless steel and nickel-based superalloy RR1000 which have substantial effects on fatigue life. Stored energy density has provided a reasonably consistent and unifying explanation for the experimental observations of fatigue life in axial, torsional, in-phase proportional tension and torsion, and non-proportional loading regimes. A single fatigue quantity (the critical stored energy density, equating to new surface energy) has been shown to provide good qualitative and reasonable quantitative prediction of the experimental observations of the complex loading, providing a mechanistic explanation for the fatigue behaviour. For the case where significant densities of GNDs develop (for the fine-grained nickel), the latter is found to differentiate the proportional and non-proportional fatigue lives and its contribution to the local stored energy is crucial for capturing the correct fatigue lives under the differing loadings.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. A universally applicable multiaxial fatigue criterion in 2D cyclic loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.013 ↗
2. Cyclic mechanical behavior of 316L: uniaxial LCF and strain-controlled ratcheting tests10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.01.010 ↗
3. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
4. Chattopadhyay S. Investigation of proportional and non-proportional loadings using Mohr's circle; 2012.
5. Proportionally and non-proportionally perturbed fatigue of stainless steel10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.12.013 ↗
6. Multiaxial fatigue life prediction for titanium alloy TC4 under proportional and nonproportional loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.028 ↗
7. Low-cycle fatigue under out-of-phase loading conditions10.1115/1.3443523 ↗
8. Multiaxial fatigue of extruded AZ31B magnesium alloy10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.039 ↗
9. Carpinteri A, Macha E, Brighenti R, et al. Critical fracture plane under multiaxial random loading by means of Euler angles averaging. In: European Structural Integrity Society. Elsevier; 1999. p. 166–78.10.1016/S1566-1369(99)80014-4 ↗
10. Prediction of crack initiation plane direction in high-cycle multiaxial fatigue with in-phase and out-of-phase loading10.1111/ffe.12620 ↗
11. Multiaxial fatigue damage parameter and life prediction for medium-carbon steel based on the critical plane approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.005 ↗
12. A synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of non-proportional strain-path effects10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.011 ↗
13. Biaxial fatigue tests with zero mean stresses using tubular specimens10.1016/0020-7403(70)90091-3 ↗
14. A multiaxial fatigue approach to Rolling Contact Fatigue in railways10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.02.001 ↗
15. Fatigue damage in 1045 steel under variable amplitude biaxial loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1985.tb01197.x ↗
16. Kalluri · 1993
17. Socie · 2000
18. Effects of crystallographic orientations and dwell types on low cycle fatigue and life modeling of a SC superalloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.12.005 ↗
19. Brown MW, Miller K. A theory for fatigue failure under multiaxial stress-strain conditions. Proc Instit Mech Eng 1973; 187(1): p. 745–755.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1973_187_069_02 ↗
20. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out-of-phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
21. A path-independent parameter for fatigue under proportional and non-proportional loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1993.tb00739.x ↗
22. Shear strain based multiaxial fatigue parameters applied to variable amplitude loading10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00091-7 ↗
23. Brown MW, Miller KJ. Mode I fatigue crack growth under biaxial stress at room and elevated temperature. In: Multiaxial fatigue. ASTM International; 1985.10.1520/STP36221S ↗
24. Fatigue analysis under variable amplitude loading using an energy parameter10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00169-X ↗
25. Fatigue characterization and modeling of 30CrNiMo8HH under multiaxial loading10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.075 ↗
26. New methodology of fatigue life evaluation for multiaxially loaded notched components based on two uniaxial strain-controlled tests10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.02.027 ↗
27. High temperature fatigue tests of un-notched and notched specimens made of 40CrMoV13. steel10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.048 ↗
28. Fatigue life estimation for multiaxial low-cycle fatigue regime: the influence of the effective Poisson ratio value10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.06.013 ↗
29. Microstructurally-sensitive fatigue crack nucleation in Ni-based single and oligo crystals10.1016/j.jmps.2017.05.012 ↗
30. Is stored energy density the primary meso-scale mechanistic driver for fatigue crack nucleation?10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.11.005 ↗
31. A stored energy criterion for fatigue crack nucleation in polycrystals10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.06.001 ↗
32. DREAM. 3D: a digital representation environment for the analysis of microstructure in 3D. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing
33. A Comparative Assessment of Iron and Cobalt-based Hard-facing Alloy Deformation using HR-EBSD and HR-DIC10.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.021 ↗