Microstructure and fatigue behavior of novel Multi-Ring Domed resistance spot welds for thin X626-T4 aluminum sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Resistance spot welding of aluminum alloys is increasingly used in the automotive industry for vehicle lightweighting and better fuel efficiency. In this contribution, General Motor’s aluminum spot welding process including Multi-Ring Domed (MRD) electrodes and Conditioning, Shaping, and Sizing (CSS) weld schedule were used for welding of 0.8-mm thick X626-T4 aluminum alloy sheet. The resultant spot welds had an equiaxed grain structure adjacent to the weld nugget periphery. Within the weld nugget, fine columnar grains were found at the nugget perimeter, while welding defects were concentrated in the centre of the nugget. Using modified shear specimens, it was determined that the weld nugget is the weakest location while the heat affected zone is enhanced by precipitation aging due to a combination of welding and paint bake thermal cycles. We then derived a new equation for calculating minimum weld nugget diameters to ensure that interfacial fracture would not occur during tensile and fatigue testing. Load controlled fatigue test results showed that using structural stress analysis, fatigue life curves for both lap-shear and coach-peel configurations fell onto a single master curve indicating that the weld nugget size is the controlling parameter for fatigue life. While fracture mode varied with load amplitude from full button pullout at high amplitude to eyebrow-like fracture with kinked crack paths at low amplitude, no interfacial fracture occurred during fatigue testing due to the large size of the weld nugget even though the weld nugget is the weakest location.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Patrick EP, Sharp ML. Joining aluminum auto body structure. SAE paper 920282. Warrendale, PA, U.S.A.: SAE International; 1992.10.4271/920282 ↗
2. Numerical simulation of resistance spot welding of Al to zinc-coated steel with improved representation of contact interactions10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.023 ↗
3. Effect of resistance spot welding parameters on AA1100 aluminum alloy and sgacd zinc coated lap joint10.17703/IJACT.2015.3.1.153 ↗
4. Static and fatigue behavior of spot-welded 5182–0 aluminum alloy sheet
5. Charactrization of constitutive behavior of dissimilar aluminum alloy resistance spot welds
6. Sigler DR, Schroth JG, Karagoulis MJ. Weld electrode for attractive weld appearance. U.S. Patent 8, 222, 560, July 17, 2012.
7. Sigler DR, Schroth JG, Karagoulis MJ, Zuo D. New electrode weld face geometries for spot welding aluminum, Conference Proceedings. AWS Sheet Metal Welding Conference XIV, Livonia, May 2010; 11-14:1-19.
8. Sigler DR, Karagoulis MJ. Weld schedule for resistance spot welding of aluminum alloy work pieces. US Patent Application# 20130048613; 2013.
9. Effect of adhesive on fatigue property of Aural2 to AA5754 dissimilar aluminum alloy resistance spot welds10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.01.009 ↗
10. Fatigue behavior of dissimilar aluminum alloy spot welds10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.053 ↗
11. ASTM International. ASTM B831-14 standard test method for shear testing of thin aluminum alloy products. Annual book of ASTM standards, vol. 2.2. West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2015.
12. Constitutive behavior of AA5754 sheet materials at large strains
13. Determination of the constitutive behaviour of X626–T4 aluminium alloy spot welds at large strains10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.014 ↗
14. An approach in prediction of failure in resistance spot welded aluminum 6061–T6 under quasi-static tensile test10.1177/0954405411435198 ↗
15. Microstructure and mechanical properties of resistance-spot-welded joints for A5052 aluminum alloy and DP 600 steel10.1016/j.matchar.2016.08.015 ↗
16. Low-cycle fatigue life prediction of spot welds based on hardness distribution and finite element analysis10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.04.009 ↗
17. The aluminum spot weld
18. Resistance spot weld failure mode and weld performance for aluminum alloys10.1533/9781845699765.24 ↗
19. American Welding Society. Testing Methods for Evaluating the Resistance Spot Welding Behavior of Automotive Sheet Steel Materials, U.S.; 2012.
20. Ultimate strength and failure mechanism of resistance spot weld subjected to tensile, shear, or combined tensile/shear loads10.1115/1.1555648 ↗
21. Improvement of resistance-spot-welded joints for DP600 steel and A5052 aluminum alloy with Zn slice interlayer10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.10.009 ↗
22. Rupp A, Storzel K, Grubisic V. Computer aided dimensioning of spot-welded automotive structures. SAE Tech Pap 950711; 1995.10.4271/950711 ↗
23. Improving fatigue performance of spot welds in advanced high-strength steels
24. A structure stress definition and numercal implementation for fatigue analysis of welded joints10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00055-X ↗
25. Bonnen J, Agrawal H, Amaya M. Fatigue of advanced high strength steel spot-welds. SAE Tech Pap 2006-01-0978; 2006.10.4271/2006-01-0978 ↗
26. Kang J, Rao HM, Sigler DR, Carlson BE. Tensile and fatigue behaviour of X626-T4 to IF steel resistance spot welds. In: 2nd International Conference on Structural Integrity, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal. Procedia Struc. Integrity; 2017; 5: p.1425–32.10.1016/j.prostr.2017.07.207 ↗
27. Sheppard SD. Further refinement of a methodology for fatigue life estimation in resistance spot weld connections. Advances in Fatigue Predictive Techniques, 3rd vol. Philadelphia: ASTM STP 1292; 1996. p. 265–82.10.1520/STP16142S ↗
28. The development of a simplified spot weld model for Battelle structural stress calculation10.4271/2011-01-0479 ↗
29. Fatigue evaluation of notched plate specimens by the Battelle structural stress method10.4271/2013-01-1011 ↗
30. A method of determining geometric stress for fatigue strength evaluation of steel welded joints10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2004.05.001 ↗
31. Comparison of different structural stress approaches for fatigue assessment of welded ship structures10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.02.001 ↗