Study of the effect of surface roughness on fatigue strength of GH4169 based on indirect evaluation of the notch root radius
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Considering the current controversy about the key indicators of surface roughness, this paper presents an indirect evaluation of the equivalent notch root radius of the surface profile. Using this method, the influence of surface roughness on fatigue strength on GH4169 is studied. Various sets of specimens with different fabrication conditions are machined to get a wide range of surface roughness. Vacuum annealing treatment is conducted on some of the specimens to eliminate the effect of residual stresses. Different classical formulae for stress concentration factor based on the notch root radius of the surface profile are used and the fatigue life reduction factor for various surface roughness values is presented. The results show that no single direct index of surface profile can determine the fatigue strength, but the indirect indexes, the notch bottom radius and the stress concentration factor can be used. The surface notch roots radius ρ is the key to the stress concentration coefficient. Using the arch-height & chord - length formula proposed in this paper to evaluate ρ , the linear fitting goodness of the stress concentration coefficient and the fatigue strength reaches 0.9.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Recent research and development of titanium alloys for aviation application in China
2. Surface integrity in material removal processes: recent advances10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002 ↗
3. Evolution and empirical modeling of compressive residual stress profile after milling, polishing and shot peening for TC1710.1016/j.jmapro.2017.02.002 ↗
4. The effect of roughness and residual stresses on fatigue life time of an alloy of titanium10.1007/s00170-014-6596-7 ↗
5. Evaluation of residual stress relaxation and its effect on fatigue strength of AISI 316L stainless steel ground surfaces: experimental and numerical approaches10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.10.008 ↗
6. Fatigue life of machined components10.1007/s40436-016-0168-z ↗
7. The effect of surface and subsurface condition on the fatigue life of Ti-25V-15Cr-2Al-0.2C %wt alloy10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.074 ↗
8. Improving the reliability of gas turbine engine blades with processing methods. The Second Aviation Information Office. Chengdu; 1972.
9. On the conjoint influence of broaching and heat treatment on bending fatigue behavior of Inconel 71810.1016/j.msea.2016.06.030 ↗
10. Effect of surface topography on room temperature tensile ductility of TiAl10.1007/s11837-017-2547-8 ↗
11. Estimating the fatigue stress concentration factor of machined surfaces10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00012-9 ↗
12. Influences of milling and grinding on machined surface roughness and fatigue behavior of GH4169 superalloy workpieces10.1016/j.cja.2017.07.013 ↗
13. Modelling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.06.003 ↗
14. A proposition for new quality 3D indexes to measure surface roughness10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.136 ↗
15. Predicting fatigue life for finite roller contacts based on a mixed EHL model using realistic surface roughness10.1007/s12206-017-0630-2 ↗
16. Sensitivity of material failure to surface roughness: A study on titanium alloys Ti64 and Ti40710.1016/j.matdes.2020.109438 ↗
17. Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.11.003 ↗
18. China aeronautical materials handbook (second edition, second volume). Beijing: China Standards Press; 2001, p. 323–59.
19. Lee YL, Pan J, Hathaway R, Barkey ME. Fatigue testing and analysis: theory and practice. Burlington, MA 01803: ELSEVIER INC.; 2004.
20. Mu · 2009
21. Walter D, Deborah FP. Peterson Stress concentration factors.New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1974. [10.1002/9780470172674.ch1].
22. Neuber · 1958 · 159
23. An examination of the effects from surface texture on the strength of fiber-reinforced plastics10.1177/002199839903300201 ↗
24. Sensitivity analysis of the influence of milling parameters on the surface residual stress of titanium alloy TC1110.1016/j.procir.2016.10.045 ↗
25. A fundamental study on the impact of surface integrity by hard turning on rolling contact fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.12.002 ↗
26. Analysis and optimization of cutter geometric parameters for surface integrity in milling titanium alloy using a modified grey-Taguchi method10.1177/0954405415599927 ↗
27. Abrasive machining of advanced aerospace alloys and composites10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.004 ↗
28. Influence of customized cutting edge geometries on the workpiece residual stress in hard turning10.1177/0954405416685388 ↗
29. Residual stress and its role in failure10.1088/0034-4885/70/12/R04 ↗
30. The influence of surface roughness on the fatigue life and scatter of test results of two steels
31. Effect of turning and surface polishing treatments on surface integrity and fatigue performance of nickel-based alloy GH416910.3390/met8070549 ↗
32. Gao · 2014