Crack initiation and life estimation for 316 and 430 stainless steel specimens by means of a critical plane approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In the present paper, the fatigue behaviour of two stainless steels is analysed by employing the criterion by Carpinteri et al. Such a criterion has already been applied to many data related to different metals, but the novelty of this paper is its application to assess the results of experimental tests performed under HCF triaxial loading. Such experimental data, found in the literature, are related to hollow cylindrical dog-bone specimens made of both 316 and 430 stainless steel. The experimental results are compared with the analytical ones in terms of both fatigue lifetime and initial crack plane orientation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Comparison of TCD and SED methods in fatigue lifetime assessment10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.009 ↗
2. Fatigue behavior of 2618–T851 aluminum alloy under uniaxial and multiaxial loadings10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105322 ↗
3. Multiaxial fatigue of additive manufactured metals: Performance, analysis, and applications10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105479 ↗
4. Equivalent fatigue load approach for fatigue design of uncertain structures10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105516 ↗
5. Online multiaxial fatigue damage evaluation method by real-time cycle counting and energy-based critical plane criterion10.1111/ffe.13192 ↗
6. Multiaxial fatigue damage parameter and life prediction without any additional material constants
7. A brief review of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue, Metallurg and Mater Transact B: process Metallurgy and Mater Processing
8. Multiaxial fatigue: an overview and some approximation models for life estimation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.003 ↗
9. Multiaxial fatigue: from materials testing to life prediction10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.05.008 ↗
10. A survey on multiaxial fatigue damage parameters under non-proportional loadings10.1111/ffe.12659 ↗
11. The performance of selected multiaxial criteria under tension/torsion loading conditions10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105532 ↗
12. Socie D.F., Marquis G.B., Multiaxial Fatigue. Warrendale, PA (USA): Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.; 2000.
13. Development of a multiaxial fatigue damage model for high strength alloys using a critical plane methodology10.1115/1.2969255 ↗
14. Multiaxial fatigue assessment using a simplified critical plane-based criterion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.004 ↗
15. Structural integrity assessment of metallic components under multiaxial fatigue: the C-S criterion and its evolution10.1111/ffe.12037 ↗
16. An alternative definition of the shear stress amplitude based on the Maximum Rectangular Hull method and application to the C-S (Carpinteri-Spagnoli) criterion10.1111/ffe.12180 ↗
17. On the use of the Prismatic Hull method in a critical plane-based multiaxial fatigue criterion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.05.007 ↗
18. Critical plane orientation influence on multiaxial high-cycle fatigue assessment10.1134/S1029959915040074 ↗
19. Life estimation by varying the critical plane orientation in the modified Carpinteri-Spagnoli criterion
20. Fatigue life estimation of fillet-welded tubular T-joints subjected to multiaxial loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.10.012 ↗
21. Lifetime estimation of mechanical assemblies under constant amplitude fretting fatigue loading10.1111/ffe.13043 ↗
22. Fretting failure of a pressure armour in an unbonded flexible riser10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105203 ↗
23. Multiaxial fatigue properties of stainless steel under seven loading paths consisting of cyclic inner pressure and push-pull loading10.1016/j.tafmec.2018.05.015 ↗
24. Investigation of the multiaxial fatigue behaviour of 316 stainless steel based on critical plane method10.1111/ffe.12991 ↗
25. Multiaxial fatigue strength of type 316 stainless steel under push-pull, reversed torsion, cyclic inner and outer pressure loading10.1016/j.ijpvp.2016.02.024 ↗
26. Goodman · 1899
27. On the characterization of the critical plane with a simple and fast alternative measure of the shear stress amplitude in multiaxial fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.002 ↗
28. Critical plane approaches in high-cycle fatigue: on the definition of the amplitude and mean value of the shear stress acting on the critical plane10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00459.x ↗
29. Efficient algorithms for calculation of shear stress amplitude and amplitude of the second invariant of the shear deviator in fatigue criteria applications10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00181-5 ↗
30. A unified numerical approach for multiaxial fatigue limit evaluation10.1081/SME-100100613 ↗
31. Using enclosing ellipsoids in multiaxial fatigue strenght criteria10.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.07.006 ↗
32. Comparative study of multiaxial fatigue damage models for ductile structural steel and brittle materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.006 ↗
33. Prismatic hull: a new measure of shear stress amplitude in multiaxial high cycle fatigue10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.12.010 ↗
34. Minimum Circumscribed Ellipse (MCE) and Stress Scale Factor (SSF) criteria for multiaxial fatigue life assessment10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.08.008 ↗
35. Study on rotating bending fatigue characteristic of several stainless steels at high temperature, Nihon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu10.1299/kikaia.72.114 ↗
36. ASTM E2207 standard practice for strain‐controlled axial-torsional fatigue testing with thin‐walled tubular specimens, 2015.
37. Material dependence of multiaxial low cycle fatigue lives under non-proportional loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.12.001 ↗
38. Arora P, Gupta SK, Samal MK, Chattopadhyay J. Validating generality of recently developed critical plane model for fatigue life assessments using multiaxial test database on seventeen different materials, Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13169. [in press].10.1111/ffe.13169 ↗