Fatigue damage assessment of corroded oil tanker details based on global and local stress approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Fatigue damage assessment of double hull oil tanker structural details is performed, based on global and local structural finite element models. The wave-induced vertical and horizontal bending moments, as well as local pressure loads are accounted for in the fatigue damage calculations. Local stress analyses are considered based on the notch stress approach. Time-dependent stresses as a function of corrosion deterioration are analyzed based on nonlinear corrosion wastage during the design life of ship. The effective notch stress approach is applied for analyzing the stress distributions and the fatigue damage of the welded joint at two hotspots. The hotspots are located between the flat bar stiffener of a transverse web frame and the flange of a longitudinal stiffener at the side shell of a tanker ship hull. The details under consideration are modeled separately in a fine mesh employing the sub model techniques. Finally the fatigue damage assessment accounting for corrosion deterioration of the considered hotspots is analyzed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. IACS. Common structural rules for double hull oil tankers. In: International association of classification societies; 2010.
2. Comparison of different structural stress approaches for fatigue assessment of welded ship structures10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.02.001 ↗
3. Fatigue analysis of ship deck structures accounting for imperfections10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.015 ↗
4. Comparative stress concentration factor analysis of an imperfect welded deck structure10.3233/ISP-2008-0038 ↗
5. Radaj · 1990
6. Fricke W. Guideline for fatigue assessment by notch stress analysis for welded structures. In: IIW Doc; 2008.
7. Re-analysis of fatigue data for welded joints using the notch stress approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.03.001 ↗
8. Fatigue assessment of large-size welded joints based on the effective notch stress approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.11.012 ↗
9. Hobbacher A. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components, IIW doc.1823-07. Welding Research Council Bulletin 520. International Institute of Welding, New York; 2009.
10. Saad S, Tran Nguyen K, Garbatov Y, Guedes Soares C. Fatigue stress assessment accounting for contact effect. In: Proceeding of the 10th international conference on marine science and technology. Union of Scientists of Varna, Bulgaria; 2010. p. 23–33.
11. Full-scale fatigue tests of ship structures to validate the S–N approaches for fatigue strength assessment10.1016/j.marstruc.2010.01.004 ↗
12. Fatigue damage assessment of a tanker structural detail based on the effective notch stress approach10.1201/b12726-52 ↗
13. Reliability of maintained, corrosion protected plates subjected to non-linear corrosion and compressive loads10.1016/S0951-8339(99)00028-3 ↗
14. ANSYS®. Online manuals. In: United States of America: ANSYS Inc.; 2007.
15. DNV. Fatigue assessment of ship structures. In: Det Norske Veritas; 2010.
16. Hobbacher A. Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components. In: IIW Doc; 2007.
17. Experimental and numerical fatigue analysis of partial-load and full-load carrying fillet welds at doubler plates and lap joints
18. Effect of uncertain weld shape on the structural hot spot stress distribution
19. Non-linear time dependent corrosion wastage of deck plates of ballast and cargo tanks of tankers10.1115/1.2426987 ↗
20. ABS. ABS database of corrosion wastage for oil tankers. In: American Bureau of Shipping; 2002–07.
21. Wang G, Spencer J, Elsayed T, Estimation of corrosion rates of oil tankers. In: Proceeding of the 22nd international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, Cancun, Mexico. OMAE2003-37361; 2003.
22. Nolte K, Hansford J. Closed-form expressions for determining the fatigue damage of structures due to ocean waves. In: Proceeding of offshore technology conference, Houston Texas, USA; 1976. p. 861–70.10.4043/2606-MS ↗