journal article·2013-05Open access

Effect of welding residual stresses on fatigue crack growth thresholds

Gerhard Biallas

Abstract

Abstract Fatigue crack growth thresholds ΔKth were determined for friction stir welded butt joints made from aluminium alloys AA2024 and AA6013. Plotting the thresholds as a function of load ratio R showed distinctly higher amounts for welded joints as compared to those for parent material at small load ratios, but differences became smaller with increasing load ratio, until thresholds became finally identical for the highest R values. Applying Doker’s concept of two controlling parameters, namely ΔK and Kmax [1] , and plotting ΔKth versus Kmax, however, revealed that the effective threshold ΔKth,eff determined at very high R ratios was nearly independent on the alloy and, simultaneously, was identical for parent material and respective welded joints. Thus, differences in threshold behaviour were only caused by the second threshold Kmax,th, which was significantly higher for welded joints as compared to parent material. Differences in Kmax,th coincided with compressive residual stresses determined by cut-compliance measurements in terms of stress intensity factors Krs acting at the crack tip. Based on the analytical approach described by Doker [1] , only one characteristic Krs value was needed to calculate all thresholds of welded joints for 0 ⩽ R ⩽ 1 provided a base material master curve is available.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Fatigue crack growth threshold: implications, determination and data evaluation10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00058-3 ↗
2. Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Templesmith P, Dawes CJ. Improvements relating to friction welding. European Patent EP 0 615 480 B1; 1992.
3. Friction stir welding – recent developments in tool and process technologies10.1002/adem.200300355 ↗
4. Friction stir welding and processing10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001 ↗
5. Investigations on residual stresses in friction stir welds
6. Dissimilar friction stir welds in AA5083-AA6082: the effect of process parameters on residual stress10.1016/j.msea.2006.08.012 ↗
7. Residual stress evaluation of AA2024-T3 friction stir welded joints10.1007/s11665-006-9013-z ↗
8. Residual stress and microstructure effects on fatigue crack growth in AA2050 friction stir welds10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.04.016 ↗
9. Fatigue crack growth in 2024–T351 friction stir welded joints: longitudinal residual stress and microstructural effects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.05.004 ↗
10. Festigkeits- und Ermüdungsverhalten reibrührgeschweißter Verbindungen aus AA 6013–T6
11. Residual stress effects on fatigue crack propagation in friction stir welds
12. Fatigue crack propagation rates and threshold stress intensity factors for welded joints of HT80 steel at several stress ratios10.1016/0142-1123(82)90006-8 ↗
13. Effect of weld imperfections and residual stresses on the fatigue crack propagation in friction stir welded joints
14. Monotonic and cyclic strength of friction stir welded aluminium joints
15. Residual stress effects on near-threshold fatigue crack growth in friction stir welds in aerospace alloys10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2003.08.002 ↗
16. Biallas G, Vugrin T, Schneider J. Einfluss des Root-Flaws auf das Ermüdungsverhalten von FSW-Nähten. In: Bruchmechanik und Bauteilsicherheit – Themenschwerpunkt Ermüdungsbruch, DVM-Bericht 239. Berlin: DVM; 2007. p. 83–92.
17. A comparison of different methods of determination of the threshold for fatigue crack propagation
18. Fatigue threshold dependence on material, environment and microstructure
19. Döker H, Bachmann V, Castro DE, Marci G. Schwellwert für Ermüdungsrissausbreitung: Bestimmungsmethoden, Kennwerte, vol. 18. Einflussgrößen, Zeitschrift für Werkstofftechnik; 1987. p. 323–9.10.1002/mawe.19870181008 ↗
20. Döker H, Dalle Donne C. Threshold determination methods and typical material behavior. In: Blom AF, editors. Fatigue 2002 – proc 8th int fatigue congress. West Midlands: EMAS; 2002. p. 3363–70.
21. A review of crack closure, fatigue crack threshold and related phenomena10.1016/0921-5093(94)90351-4 ↗
22. Short crack growth and internal stresses10.1016/S0142-1123(97)00057-1 ↗
23. Extension of the unified approach to fatigue crack growth to environmental interactions10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00137-2 ↗
24. Analysis of endurance limits under very high cycle fatigue using a unified damage approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.028 ↗
25. A two-parameter analysis of S–N fatigue life using Δσ and σmax10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.03.007 ↗
26. Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension10.1016/0013-7944(70)90028-7 ↗
27. ASTM E 647-00 · 2001
28. Procedure for automated tests of fatigue crack propagation
29. Experimental determination of stress intensity factors due to residual stresses10.1007/BF02317418 ↗
30. Measuring residual stress and the resulting stress intensity factor in compact tension specimens10.1046/j.1460-2695.1999.00155.x ↗
31. Braun R, Biallas G, Dalle Donne C, Staniek G. Characterisation of mechanical properties and corrosion performance of friction stir welded 6013 aluminium alloy sheet. In: Winkler PJ, editors. Proc EUROMAT99 – materials for transportation technology, vol. 1. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2000. p. 150–5.10.1002/3527606025.ch25 ↗
32. Some steps towards automation of the crack compliance method to measure residual stress distributions
33. Experimental determination of crack closure by the cut compliance method