journal article·2021-12

Fatigue reliability design and assessment of reactor pressure vessel structures: Concepts and validation

Xiao-Peng Niu, Shun-Peng Zhu, Jin-Chao He, Yang Ai, Kaikai Shi, Liping Zhang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Traditional design approaches using safety factors are intended to account for uncertainties due to the lack of available data in engineering practice. However, the direct use of safety factor to represent uncertainties often causes conservative results, and it is not intuitive to describe the reliability of these structures through safety factor. To deal with the issue, this research revisits the initial consideration and intent of the safety factor for static strength and adjustment factor for fatigue design curve in the ASME code. Three conversion models applying to reactor pressure vessel (RPV) materials are proposed on basis of the stress–strength, load–life and strength–damage interference theories, which elaborate the relationship between safety/adjustment factors and structural reliability. The dispersion of strength and fatigue life is quantified, and then implemented to elaborate safety and adjustment factors with reliability respectively, which verifies the validity of safety assessment methods in the ASME code. Moreover, the safety/adjustment factor design under required reliability level is achieved, has the advantages of intuitiveness and convenience, which provides a reference for the reliability and safety design of RPV.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Nuclear and radioactivity studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. L. Zheng et al., “Effect of several design parameters on the sealing performance of reactor pressure vessel,” in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication) PVP, 2020, vol. 83839, p. V003T03A015.
2. Probabilistic modeling of uncertainties in fatigue reliability analysis of turbine bladed disks10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105912 ↗
3. Elishakoff · 2012
4. Safety factors in civil aircraft design requirements10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.08.008 ↗
5. “aReliability-based design optimization using probabilistic safety factor”, in 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures
6. Comparison of the reliability-based and safety factor methods for structural design10.1016/j.apm.2019.03.018 ↗
7. Equivalence between reliability and factor of safety10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.04.004 ↗
8. Fuzzy sets based interpretation of the safety factor10.1016/j.fss.2006.06.009 ↗
9. Reliability-based design optimization using probabilistic sufficiency factor10.1007/s00158-004-0390-3 ↗
10. A reliability-based safety factor for aircraft composite structures10.1016/0045-7949(93)90269-J ↗
11. Elishakoff · “Interrelation Between Safety Factors and Reliability” · 2001
12. Reliability based calibration of safety factors for unstiffened cylindrical composite shells10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.02.082 ↗
13. Non-probabilistic set-theoretic model for structural safety measure10.1007/s00707-007-0518-9 ↗
14. “BS 7910: Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures”, BSI Standards
15. French RSE-M and RCC-MR code appendices for flaw analysis: Presentation of the fracture parameters calculation-Part I: General overview10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.05.003 ↗
16. ASME, “ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code - Section II, Part D,” ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, no. Section II, Part D, pp. 1032, 2015.
17. GB/T19624-2004. The criterion of safety assessment for in-service pressure vessels containing defects.
18. ASME section III design-by-analysis criteria concepts and stress limits10.1115/1.2140797 ↗
19. Bomin · 2014
20. Reliability of Composite Laminates10.1080/08905458808960275 ↗
21. Karthikeyan · 2020
22. ASME BPVC Section III Division 1, Subsection NB
23. Probabilistic fatigue assessment of notched components under size effect using critical distance theory10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107150 ↗
24. Probabilistic fatigue model for cast alloys of aero engine applications10.1108/IJSI-05-2020-0048 ↗
25. Structural-probabilistic modeling of fatigue failure under elastic-plastic deformation10.1108/IJSI-05-2018-0024 ↗
26. Probabilistic modeling of fatigue life distribution and size effect of components with random defects10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.005 ↗
27. Computational-experimental approaches for fatigue reliability assessment of turbine bladed disks10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.04.050 ↗
28. Fatigue reliability assessment of turbine discs under multi-source uncertainties10.1111/ffe.12772 ↗
29. “Margins for ASME Code fatigue design curve - Effects of surface finish and material variability”, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication)
30. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction and reliability assessment of a high pressure turbine disc considering load variations10.1177/1056789517737132 ↗
31. R. Manouchehry Nya, S. Abdullah, and S. Singh Karam Singh, “Reliability-based fatigue life of vehicle spring under random loading,” International Journal of Structural Integrity, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 737–748, 2019.10.1108/IJSI-03-2019-0025 ↗
32. Numerical study of fatigue damage under random loading using Rainflow cycle counting10.1108/IJSI-04-2020-0036 ↗
33. Size effect on structural strength: A review
34. Recent advances on size effect in metal fatigue under defects: a review
35. Recent advances on notch effects in metal fatigue: A review10.1111/ffe.13195 ↗
36. Fatigue life prediction of notched components under size effect using stress gradient-based approach
37. Assessment of notch fatigue and size effect using stress field intensity approach10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106279 ↗
38. The effect of notch size on critical distance and fatigue life predictions10.1016/j.matdes.2020.109095 ↗
39. Probabilistic framework for fatigue life assessment of notched components under size effects10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105685 ↗
40. Notch fatigue analysis and crack initiation life estimation of maraging steel fabricated by laser beam powder bed fusion under multiaixal loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106468 ↗
41. Comparison of different one-parameter damage laws and local stress-strain approaches in multiaxial fatigue life assessment of notched components10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106405 ↗
42. Cooper W E, “The Initial Scope and Intent of the Section III Fatigue Design Procedure,” Welding Research Council, Inc., Technical Information from Workshop on Cyclic Life and Environmental Effects in Nuclear Applications, Clearwater, Florida., 1992.
43. An efficient time-dependent reliability method10.1016/j.strusafe.2019.05.001 ↗
44. Probabilistic framework for multiaxial LCF assessment under material variability10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.019 ↗
45. Probabilistic descriptions of resistance of safety-related structures in nuclear plants10.1016/0029-5493(85)90059-7 ↗
46. Comparison of fracture properties in SA508 Gr.3 and Gr.4N high strength low alloy steels for advanced pressure vessel materials10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.04.010 ↗
47. Fatigue and High-temperature Tensile Properties of SA508 Gr.3 Cl.1 Steel
48. Three-dimensional finite element welding residual stress analysis of penetration nozzles: I - Sensitivity of analysis variables10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.11.006 ↗
49. The effect of irradiation on the toughness of pressurized water reactor vessel steels under different service conditions10.1016/0029-5493(84)90251-6 ↗
50. Irradintion-embrittlement of reactor pressure vessel steel
51. Microstructural evolution and mechanical characterization for the A508–3 steel before and after phase transition10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.08.013 ↗
52. Manufacturing process and properties of nuclear RPV shell ring forged from hollow ingot10.1016/0029-5493(84)90007-4 ↗
53. X. Wu, Y. Katada, S. G. Lee, and I. S. Kim, “Hydrogen-involved tensile and cyclic deformation behavior of low-alloy pressure vessel steel,” Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, vol. 35 A, no. 5, pp. 1477–1486, 2004.10.1007/s11661-004-0256-8 ↗
54. Application of high strength MnMoNi steel to pressure vessels for nuclear power plant10.1016/S0029-5493(00)00440-4 ↗
55. A Study on Machining Effects on Residual Stress at Dissimilar Metal Weld Region10.5781/KWJS.2011.29.2.056 ↗
56. Effects of mercury on fatigue behavior of Type 316 LN stainless steel: Application in the spallation neutron source10.1016/S0022-3115(03)00116-8 ↗
57. Relationship between hardening and damage structure in austenitic stainless steel 316LN irradiated at low temperature in the HFIR10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00009-4 ↗
58. Low cycle fatigue behaviors of type 316LN austenitic stainless steel in 310 °C deaerated water-fatigue life and dislocation structure development10.1016/j.msea.2007.07.023 ↗
59. Tensile behaviour of 316LN stainless steel at elevated temperatures10.1179/1878641314Y.0000000014 ↗
60. Creep rupture properties of type 316LN stainless steel welded by the SAW process10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.119.91 ↗
61. Strain-rate dependent fatigue behavior of 316LN stainless steel in high-temperature water10.1016/j.jnucmat.2017.03.040 ↗
62. Comparative evaluation of welding consumables for dissimilar welds between 316LN austenitic stainless steel and Alloy 80010.1016/S0022-3115(99)00275-5 ↗
63. Effect of irradiation on the steels 316L/LN type to 12 dpa at 400 °C10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.099 ↗
64. “Proposal of fatigue life equations for carbon & low-Alloy steels and austenitic stainless steels as a function of tensile strength”, in ASME, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication)
65. “Study on a new design fatigue evaluation method”, in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication)
66. K. Sun, X. Wu, G. Li, and B. Wen, “The Fracture Toughness Properties of China Manufactured Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels in Transition Temperature Range,” 2018.10.1115/PVP2018-84110 ↗
67. Effect of mean stress and ratcheting strain on the low cycle fatigue behavior of a wrought 316LN stainless steel10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.053 ↗
68. “Effects of LWR coolant environments on fatigue lives of austenitic stainless steels”, In ASME, Pressure Vessels and Piping Division (Publication)
69. Fatigue reliability for offshore structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1984)110:10(2340) ↗
70. Level control in the steam generator of a nuclear power plant10.1109/87.817692 ↗