A diagram for capturing and predicting failure locations in notch geometries produced by additive manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
In a recent work by the authors Solberg and Berto (2019), as-built notch geometries of Inconel 718 produced by selective laser melting was investigated under fatigue loading. One of the findings was that fatigue did not initiate from the notch roots, but from defects adjacent. A diagram was developed for capturing the failure locations. Here, a generalized formulation of the diagram is proposed. The model can be useful for developing understanding of which is the dominant feature determining the failure locations; local or global notch geometries. The diagram can be applied in various loading cases, ranging from fatigue to static loading.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Notch-defect interaction in additively manufactured inconel 71810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.12.021 ↗
2. Welding failure analysis10.1016/1044-5803(94)90049-3 ↗
3. Compressive properties of ti-6al-4v lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting: design, orientation and density
4. Numerical models for buckling, postbuckling and failure analysis of pre-damaged thin-walled composite struts subjected to uniform compression10.1016/j.tws.2019.02.030 ↗
5. ASTM. E1820-09 standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, Standard E1820-09. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2009.
6. ASTM. E399-19 standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness kic of metallic materials, Standard E399-19. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2019.
7. Additive manufacturing of 3d nano-architected metals10.1038/s41467-018-03071-9 ↗
8. Effects of build orientation and heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melted ti6al4v lattice structures
9. Advanced lattice support structures for metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.020 ↗
10. Progress towards metal additive manufacturing standardization to support qualification and certification10.1007/s11837-017-2265-2 ↗
11. Defect distribution and microstructure heterogeneity effects on fracture resistance and fatigue behavior of EBM Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.06.001 ↗
12. Additive manufacturing of fatigue resistant materials: challenges and opportunities10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.01.001 ↗
13. A review of mechanical properties of additively manufactured inconel 718
14. Design for additive manufacturing with site-specific properties in metals and alloys10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.10.030 ↗
15. Anisotropy and heterogeneity of microstructure and mechanical properties in metal additive manufacturing: a critical review10.1016/j.matdes.2017.11.021 ↗
16. Metal additive manufacturing: a review of mechanical properties10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-032024 ↗
17. An improved prediction of residual stresses and distortion in additive manufacturing10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.10.003 ↗
18. Metal additive-manufacturing process and residual stress modeling10.1186/s40192-016-0047-2 ↗
19. Pore elimination mechanisms during 3d printing of metals10.1038/s41467-019-10973-9 ↗
20. Mitigation of lack of fusion defects in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.10.028 ↗
21. Prediction of lack of fusion porosity in selective laser melting based on melt pool monitoring data
22. Influence of defects and as-built surface roughness on fatigue properties of additively manufactured alloy 71810.1016/j.msea.2018.08.072 ↗
23. Surface roughness effects on the fatigue strength of additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.07.013 ↗
24. Towards predicting differences in fatigue performance of laser powder bed fused Ti-6Al-4V coupons from the same build10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.05.004 ↗
25. Stress concentration
26. An analysis of defects influence on axial fatigue strength of maraging steel specimens produced by additive manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.034 ↗
27. Fatigue life of additively manufactured Ti–6Al–4V in the very high cycle fatigue regime10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.018 ↗
28. Fatigue of additively manufactured 316l stainless steel: the influence of porosity and surface roughness10.1111/ffe.13077 ↗
29. Fatigue properties of AlSi10Mg obtained by additive manufacturing: defect-based modelling and prediction of fatigue strength10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.11.002 ↗
30. Do additive manufactured parts deserve better?10.1111/ffe.13092 ↗
31. Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.11.011 ↗
32. Evaluation of analytical modeling for improvement of surface roughness of fdm test part using measurement results10.1007/s00170-015-6879-7 ↗
33. A unified approach to the evaluation of linear elastic stress fields in the neighborhood of cracks and notches10.1007/BF00018497 ↗
34. Notch sensitivity and defect sensitivity under fatigue loading: two sides of the same medal10.1023/A:1007686727207 ↗
35. Recent developments in brittle and quasi-brittle failure assessment of engineering materials by means of local approaches10.1016/j.mser.2013.11.001 ↗
36. Generalised stress intensity factors for rounded notches in plates under in-plane shear loading10.1007/s10704-011-9613-y ↗