A log-normal format for failure probability under LCF: Concept, validation and definition of design curve
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Turbine components are usually designed onto safe-life approach, where the low-cycle fatigue analysis is based on design life curves with suitable probabilistic life margins. However, in order to design for a given reliability, the definition of the design curve should not only include the life variability but also the scatter of applied load. Unfortunately, in the literature there are few indications which only refer to safety factors under HCF, without any specific discussion for the case of components subjected to LCF. In this paper, we firstly propose a log-normal format for calculating reliability for an assessment point ( ∊ , N ^ ) based on a first order approximation. The validity of the approach is then proved for two different materials with a series of Monte Carlo simulations, where the material cyclic response is coupled to its ∊ - N diagram. The format is then used for estimating failure probability and for defining the design point which corresponds to a target failure probability. A safety factor is then proposed and its application to a series of steels for power generation is shown.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Lifing methods and safety criteria in aero gas turbines10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.08.010 ↗
2. Use of safety factors for the design of steel structures according to eurocodes10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.08.002 ↗
3. BS 7910. Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures, British Standards; 2005.
4. ISO EN 1993. Eurocode 3: design of steel structures, ISO; 2005.
5. FKM Guideline · 2012
6. ASME BPVDC III-Div. 1. ASME boiler & pressure vessel design code – III Div. 1 – rules for construction of nuclear facility components, ASME; 2005.
7. Donnel WO. Code design and evaluation for cyclic loading – sections III and VIII. In: Rao K, editor. Companion guide to the ASME boiler & pressure vessel code, vol. 2, 2nd ed., Techstreet; 2006.
8. Chopra O, Shack W. Review of the margins for ASME code fatigue design curve – effects of surface roughness and material variability. Tech Rep NUREG/CR6815, ANL-02/39. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 2003.10.2172/925073 ↗
9. Tong Y. Literature review on aircraft structural risk and reliability analysis. Tech Rep DSTR-1306. DSTO Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory; February 2001.
10. Evaluation of standard life assessment procedures and life extension methodologies for fracture-critical components10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00116-5 ↗
11. Probabilistic assessment of low cycle fatigue behaviour of structural welds10.1115/1.3454319 ↗
12. Wirsching PH. The application of probabilistic design theory to high temperature, low-cycle fatigue. Tech Rep NASA CR-165488. NASA; 1981.
13. Singh M, Thakur B, Sullivan W. Assessing useful life of turbomachinery components. In: Proc 34th turbomachinery symposium; 2005.
14. Socie D, Downing S. Statistical strain-life fatigue analysis. In: SAE technical papers, no. 960566, SAE; 1996.10.4271/960566 ↗
15. Socie D. Probabilistic aspects of fatigue, lecture note. ; 2003.
16. A probabilistic model for LCF10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.07.015 ↗
17. Schmitz S, Gottschalk GRH, Krause R. Probabilistic analysis of LCF crack initiation life of a turbine blade under thermomechanical loading; 2013. arXiv:1310.0629.10.1115/GT2013-94899 ↗
18. Rao · 1992
19. Probabilistic methods for design assessment of reliability with inspection10.2514/2.1730 ↗
20. ASTM E739. Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life (S–N) and strain-life (∊-N) fatigue data, American Society for Testing And Materials; 1991.
21. Nelson · 1981
22. Rusk D, Hoffmann P. Developments in probability-based strain-life analysis. Tech Rep 20010829-184. Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraraft Division; 2001.
23. Dowling · 1998
24. Fatigue design and reliability in the automotive industry
25. Bignonnet A. Reliability concepts in fatigue design. In: Sonsino C, McKeighan P, editors. 2nd Int conf material and component performance under variable amplitude loading, DVM, Darmstad; 2009.
26. Beretta S, Foletti S, Sanguineti A. A simple format for the definition of safety factors for LCF. In: Proc ASME Turbo Expo, no. GT2014-26457, Dusseldorf; 2014.10.1115/GT2014-26457 ↗
27. Thomas G, Varma R. Evaluation of low cycle fatigue test data in the BCR/VAMAS intercomparison programme. Tech Rep CD-NA-14105-EN-C. Commission of European Communities; 1993.
28. Rusconi E. Probabilistic approach to LCF design of turbine components, Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Milano; 2015.
29. Short crack propagation in LCF regime at room and high temperature in Q & T rotor steels10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.009 ↗