Ultra low-cycle fatigue performance of S420 and S700 steel welded tubular X-joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The present study is motivated by the need for improving the fatigue performance of offshore wind energy structural systems. In particular, the ultra low-cycle fatigue performance of welded tubular X-joints is examined, motivated by the need of safeguarding the integrity of offshore platforms under extreme loading conditions. The welded specimens are manufactured using hot-rolled tubes of steel grade S420 and S700, and represent X-brace joints of a bottom-fixed offshore wind tubular jacket, with scaling factor of 1:3. Seven specimens are tested under strong fully-reversed cyclic in-plane bending, leading to through-thickness fatigue cracking within less than 100 cycles, simulating extreme loading conditions. The experimental results indicate that X-joints manufactured from both steel grades exhibit similar structural response, in terms of ultra low-cycle fatigue. Rigorous finite element models are also developed, with emphasis on constitutive modeling, to simulate the cyclic loading procedure, providing very good comparisons in terms of load-displacement response and local strain predictions during the initial loading cycles. The experimental data are compared with a large dataset of low-cycle fatigue experiments on welded components, reported in the literature for mild and high-strength steel materials, as well as with existing design provisions. The results indicate similar performance of high-strength steel and mild steel welded connections, and are compared with stress-based and strain-based design methodologies in predicting the number of cycles to failure in the ultra low-cycle fatigue regime.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Jeffrey H, Sedgwick J. ORECCA. European offshore renewable energy road-map. Tech rep, The University of Edinburgh; 2011.
2. Moccia J, Arapogianni A, Wilkes J, Kjaer C, Gruet R. PurePower. Wind energy targets for 2020 and 2030. Tech rep, European Wind Energy Association (EWEA); 2011.
3. Selot F, Fraile D, Brindley G. Offshore wind in Europe - key trends and statistics 2018. Tech rep, European Wind Energy Association (EWEA); 2019.
4. Beatrice windfarm Ltd. ; 2018.
5. Alpha ventus windfarm park. ; 2013.
6. Rina. Development of modular steel jacket for offshore windfarms (JABACO). Tech rep; 2019.
7. Long-term fatigue analysis of multi-planar tubular joints for jacket-type offshore wind turbine in time domain10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.037 ↗
8. Fatigue reliability analysis of the jacket support structure for offshore wind turbine considering the effect of corrosion and inspection10.1016/j.ress.2012.06.011 ↗
9. An efficient time domain fatigue analysis and its comparison to spectral fatigue assessment for an offshore jacket structure10.1016/j.marstruc.2016.05.003 ↗
10. Fatigue reliability10.1016/B978-0-08-099997-5.00036-8 ↗
11. On the relationship between low cycle fatigue and crack growth rate properties in welded steel components10.1111/j.1460-2695.1992.tb00015.x ↗
12. Extremely low cycle fatigue tests on structural carbon steel and stainless steel10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.08.004 ↗
13. Behavior of butt-welds and treatments using low-carbon steel under cyclic inelastic strains10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.03.007 ↗
14. A structural strain method for low-cycle fatigue evaluation of welded components10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.03.003 ↗
15. Low-cycle fatigue test of welded tubular joints10.1061/JSDEAG.0005660 ↗
16. Health and Safety Executive. Review of low cycle fatigue resistance. Research report 207. Tech rep, BOMEL, Limited, Norwich, UK; 2004.
17. Vegte GJ, Back J, Wardenier J. Low-cycle fatigue of welded structures. Analysis of low-cycle fatigue on tubular T- and X-joints. Tech rep; 1989.
18. On the capacity of tubular T-joints subjected to severe cyclic loading
19. Fatigue of butt-welded steel pipes
20. American Welding Society. Structural welding code-Steel ANSI/AWS D.1.1-83.
21. Pei X, Dong P. An analytically formulated structural strain method for fatigue evaluation of welded components incorporating nonlinear hardening effects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct, vol. 42, 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.12900.10.1111/ffe.12900 ↗
22. A structural strain parameter for a unified treatment of fatigue behaviors of welded components10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.03.010 ↗
23. New energy-based low cycle fatigue model for reactor steels10.1016/j.matdes.2015.04.039 ↗
24. Energy-based low cycle fatigue analysis of low yield point steels10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.08.026 ↗
25. Effect of surface roughness on step-wise S-N characteristics in high strength steel10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00166-4 ↗
26. Fatigue strength improvement factors for high strength steel welded joints treated by high frequency mechanical impact10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.05.002 ↗
27. Low cycle fatigue of T-tubular joints with in-plane bending loading
28. Low cycle fatigue of T-tubular joints with out-of-plane bending loading
29. Low cycle fatigue of T-tubular joints under axial loading
30. High-strength steel tubular welded joints under extreme loading conditions
31. Structural behavior and design of high-strength steel welded tubular connections under extreme loading
32. American Welding Society. Structural welding code-Steel AWS D.1.1/D1.1M; 2004.
33. DNVGL- RP - C203. Fatigue design for offshore steel structures. Recommended Practice, DNV GL AS; 2016.
34. DNVGL- RP - C208. Determination of structural capacity by non-linear finite element analysis methods. Recommended Practice, DNV GL AS; 2016.
35. ABAQUS, Standards user’s manual, Version 2016. Hibbitt, Karlsson and Sorensen Inc; 1997.
36. Chatziioannou K, Karamanos SA, Huang Y. A robust integration algorithm for cyclic plasticity-damage models [in preparation].
37. Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity10.1016/0749-6419(86)90010-0 ↗
38. On some modifications of kinematic hardening to improve the description of ratchetting effects10.1016/0749-6419(91)90050-9 ↗
39. An advancement in cyclic plasticity modeling for multiaxial ratcheting simulation10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00012-2 ↗
40. Zhao XL. Design guide for circular and rectangular hollow section welded joints under fatigue loading; 2001.
41. API 2000, Recommended Practice 2A-WSD, Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms, working stress design (RP 2A-WSD).
42. European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures - Part 1-9: Fatigue strength of steel structures. EN 1993-1-9 standard, Brussels, Belgium; 2002.
43. A study of the effects of cyclic thermal stresses on a ductile metal
44. Manson S. Behaviour of materials under conditions of thermal stress. Tech rep, National Advisory Commission on Aeronautics: Report 1170. Cleveland: Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory; 1954.