journal article·2015-11

The equivalence of EPS and EIFS based on the same crack growth life data

J.P. Gallagher, L. Molent

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper reviews variable amplitude (VA) fatigue crack growth rate descriptions and then reports on methods for establishing starting crack sizes in damage tolerance and durability analyses. The growth rate data were generated using 68 low stress concentration (Kt) test coupons made from 7050-T7451 aluminium alloy and subjected to five fighter aircraft VA stress histories (each stress history had either two or four stress scaling factors). The experimental da/dt data are described using a simple power law relationship where da/dt = C · Krefm. Four separate approaches for fitting the da/dt data to determine the derived constants C and m are evaluated. The fitted power law exponent (m) values for the individual spectrum da/dt behaviours are found to be slightly greater than 2.0. The paper summarizes the equivalent initial flaw size (EIFS) results (based on the fits from four da/dt fitting approaches) and compares the EIFS values to the corresponding equivalent pre-crack size (EPS) values based on a back extrapolation of the ln(a) vs. Flight Hour fit to 0.0 flight hours. It is noted that the EIFS and EPS values compare extremely well.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Grandt · 2004
2. Wanhill · 2009
3. Numerical and experimental evaluation of SIF for threaded connectors10.1016/0013-7944(95)00251-0 ↗
4. Fatigue life prediction under random loading conditions in 7475–T7351 aluminium alloy using the RMS model10.1177/1056789506058605 ↗
5. Paris PC. The Fracture mechanics approach to fatigue, an interdisciplinary approach. In: Burke JJ, Reed NL, Weiss V, editors. Syracuse University Press; 1964. p. 107–32.
6. Hudson CM. A Root-Mean-Square approach for predicting fatigue crack growth under random loading. In: Chang JB, Hudson CM, editors. Methods and models for predicting fatigue crack growth under random loading. ASTM STP 748; 1982. p. 41–5310.1520/STP28333S ↗
7. Barsom · 1999
8. Fatigue under variable amplitude loading
9. Barter S, McDonald M, Molent L. Fleet fatigue life interpretation from full-scale and coupon fatigue tests – a simplified approach. In: Proceedings of the USAF aircraft structural integrity program (ASIP) conference. Memphis TN, USA; 2005.
10. Huynh · 2008
11. McDonald · 2013
12. Evaluation of spectrum fatigue crack growth using variable amplitude data10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.02.025 ↗
13. An equivalent block method for computing fatigue crack growth10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.12.001 ↗
14. Estimating fatigue-crack lives for aircraft: techniques10.1007/BF02410350 ↗
15. Gallagher JP, Stalnaker HD. Methods for analyzing fatigue crack growth rate behavior associated with flight-by-flight loading. AIAA paper no. 74–367. Presented at AIAA/SAE 15th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Las Vegas, NV; April 17–19, 1974.10.2514/6.1974-367 ↗
16. Gallagher JP, Miedlar PC, Juarez V. Rapid repair DTA technology for F-16 aircraft. In: Cooper TD, Lincoln JW, editors. Proceedings of the 1989 structural integrity program conference. WRDC-TR-90-4051. Wright-Patterson AFB; 1990. p. 497–518.
17. Gallagher JP, Giessler FJ, Berens AP, Engle Jr RM. USAF damage tolerant design handbook: guidelines for the analysis and design of damage tolerant aircraft structures, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Labs, AFWAL-TR-82-3073; May 1984.
18. Meidler PC, Berens AP, Gunderson AW, Gallagher JP. USAF Damage Tolerant design handbook: guidelines for the analysis and design of damage tolerant aircraft structures. UDR-TR-2002-00019, University of Dayton; January 2002 [updated version of Ref. [17], also released as AFRL-VA-WP-TR-2003-3002; November 2002].
19. Developing normalized crack growth curves for tracking damage in aircraft10.2514/3.58323 ↗
20. Dainty RV. The use of ‘marker blocks’ as an aid in quantitative fractography in full-scale aircraft fatigue testing – a case study. LTR-ST-1374. National Research Council Canada; 1982.
21. Experimentally derived crack growth models for different stress concentration factors10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.02.008 ↗
22. A rational theory of fatigue
23. MIL-A-83444 · 1974
24. A review of equivalent pre-crack sizes in aluminium alloy 7050-T745110.1111/ffe.12214 ↗
25. E647 − 13a · 2014
26. Economic life determination for a military aircraft10.2514/2.2512 ↗
27. McDonald M, Molent L, Green AJ. Assessment of fatigue crack growth prediction models for F/A-18 representative spectra and material. DSTO-RR-0312; 2006.
28. Pell RA, Molent L, Green AJ. The fractographical comparison of F/A-18 aluminium alloy 7050-T7451 bulkhead representative coupons tested under two fatigue load spectra at several stress levels. DSTO-TR-1547; 2004.
29. The comparison of complex load sequences tested at several stress levels by fractographic examination10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.09.007 ↗
30. Raju IS, Newman Jr JC. Stress intensity factors for corner cracks in rectangular bars, fracture mechanics. In: Cruse TA, editor. Nineteenth symposium ASTM STP 969. Philadelphia; 1988. p. 43–55.10.1520/STP33068S ↗