journal article·2011-09

An equivalent driving force model for crack growth prediction under different stress ratios

Samuel Kwofie, Nima Rahbar

International Journal of Fatigue· Volume 33· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract An equivalent driving force (EDF) model is proposed for the correlation and prediction of crack growth under different stress ratio, R , values. The equivalent driving force defines a completely-reversed stress intensity range that is expected to yield the same crack growth rate as a given stress intensity range Δ K and stress ratio R . Thus, the suggested equivalent driving force (EDF) model seeks to unify the crack growth data into a single master curve for fatigue design. The EDF depends on a single factor known as the mean-stress-sensitivity factor, which can be readily determined from experimental data. Application of the EDF model to the published data of Titanium and Aluminum alloys indicates that there exists an R -value below and above which the mean-stress-sensitivity factor differs. It was found that for −1 ⩽ R ⩽ 0.3 the mean-stress-sensitivity factor was much higher than for 0.3 R ⩽ 1. This difference in mean-stress-sensitivity to crack growth behavior in the two R -regimes could be explained in terms of the dominant mechanism controlling damage/crack growth rate.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. A critical analysis of crack propagation laws10.1115/1.3656900 ↗
2. Elber W. The significance of fatigue crack closure. In Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1971. p. 230–42.10.1520/STP26680S ↗
3. Effect of stress cycle asymmetry on fatigue crack growth10.1016/0025-5416(72)90038-9 ↗
4. A fatigue crack growth model with load ratio effects10.1016/0013-7944(87)90182-2 ↗
5. Wei RP, McEvily AJ. Fracture mechanics and corrosion fatigue. In Proceedings of the conference on corrosion fatigue. Stores, CN: N.A.C.E; 1971. p. 381–95.
6. Influence of microstructure on near-threshold fatigue-crack propagation in ultra-high strength steel10.1179/msc.1977.11.8-9.368 ↗
7. Analysis of fatigue crack closure and threshold
8. Two critical stress intensities for threshold crack propagation10.1016/0956-716X(93)90538-4 ↗
9. An evaluation of Keff estimation procedure on 6061-T6 and 2024-T3 aluminum alloys10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00055-9 ↗
10. Service load fatigue damage—a historical perspective10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00054-7 ↗
11. Enhanced model of partial crack closure for correlation of R-ratio effects in aluminum alloys10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00085-2 ↗
12. Crack closure and the fatigue-crack propagation threshold as a function of load ratio10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00069.x ↗
13. A new (K+Kmax)0.5 driving force parameter for crack growth in aluminum alloys10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00023-8 ↗
14. Correlation and prediction of fatigue crack growth for different R-ratios using Kmax and ΔK+ parameters10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.06.001 ↗
15. An exponential stress function for predicting fatigue strength and life due to mean stresses10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00044-5 ↗
16. Fatigue life prediction under conditions where cyclic creep–fatigue interaction occurs10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.022 ↗
17. Effect of load ratio and maximum stress intensity on the fatigue threshold in Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/S0013-7944(00)00099-0 ↗
18. The influence of mean stress on fatigue crack propagation in aluminum alloys10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.11.010 ↗