journal article·2015-12

Effects of loading and sample geometry on acoustic emission generation during fatigue crack growth: Implications for structural health monitoring

D. Gagar, P. Foote, P.E. Irving

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The reliability of traditional non-destructive methods for crack detection is well understood and characterised using Probability of Detection (POD) curves. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) techniques in contrast remain largely unquantified. The performance of the Acoustic Emission (AE) technique for damage detection and location in potential SHM applications is underpinned by the intensity of AE signal generation from the damage site. In this paper, factors influencing the rates of emission of Acoustic Emission (AE) signals from propagating fatigue cracks were investigated. Fatigue cracks were grown in specimens made from 2014 T6 aluminium sheet while observing the effects of changes in crack length, loading spectrum and sample geometry on rates of acoustic emission. Significant variation was found in the rates of AE signal generation during crack progression from initiation to final failure with a number of distinct phases identified in that progression implying different failure mechanisms operating at particular stages in the failure process. A new ‘probability of hit’ method for quantifying crack detecting capability using AE is also presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. A new algorithm for acoustic emission localization and flexural group velocity determination in anisotropic structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.08.013 ↗
2. Holford KM. Acoustic emission in structural health monitoring; 2009.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.413-414.15 ↗
3. Gagar DO. Validation and verification of the acoustic emission technique for structural health monitoring. PhD Thesis. Cranfield University; 2013
4. Delta T source location for acoustic emission10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.003 ↗
5. Rocha B. Structural Health Monitoring of Aircraft Structures. PhD Thesis. Universidad Tecnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superiorir Technico, Lisbon, Portugal; 2011
6. Fasana A, Garibaldi L. Measurement of acoustic emission signals: influence of the couplant; 2007.10.4028/0-87849-444-8.375 ↗
7. Acoustic emission – basic principles and future directions10.1111/j.1475-1305.2000.tb01173.x ↗
8. Acoustic emission during fatigue crack propagation in the aluminium alloys 2024 and 212410.1016/0025-5416(83)90102-7 ↗
9. Characterisation of fatigue crack extension by quantitative acoustic emission10.1007/BF00035216 ↗
10. Influence of microstructure on acoustic emission behavior during stage 2 fatigue crack growth in solution annealed, thermally aged and weld specimens of AISI type 316 stainless steel10.1016/0921-5093(96)10206-9 ↗
11. Acoustic emission and inclusion fracture in 7075 aluminum alloys10.1007/BF00614995 ↗
12. Sources of acoustic emission generated during the plastic deformation of 7075 aluminum alloy10.1007/BF02644869 ↗
13. Identification of fretting fatigue crack propagation mechanisms using acoustic emission10.1016/j.triboint.2010.06.009 ↗
14. Quantification of damage evolution in a 7075 aluminum alloy using an acoustic emission technique10.1016/j.msea.2011.05.017 ↗
15. Acoustic emission during the plastic deformation of aluminium alloys 2024 and 212410.1016/0025-5416(83)90023-X ↗
16. Prediction of fatigue crack growth in steel bridge components using acoustic emission10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.03.005 ↗
17. Finite element analysis of plasticity-induced fatigue crack closure: an overview10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00099-7 ↗
18. Acoustic emission during fatigue crack propagation in a micro-alloyed steel and welds10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.065 ↗
19. Acoustic emission monitoring of fatigue damage in metals10.1080/10589759808953043 ↗
20. Department of Defense. Military handbook of non destructive testing. MIL-HBDK-728/1; 1985.
21. Botev · 2010
22. Estimating probability of detection curves from regression data
23. Acoustic-emission source location in two dimensions by an array of three sensors10.1016/0029-1021(76)90027-X ↗
24. A crack opening stress equation for fatigue crack growth10.1007/BF00020751 ↗
25. A new closure based approach for fatigue crack length estimation using the acoustic emission technique in structural health monitoring applications10.1088/0964-1726/23/10/105033 ↗
26. Suresh · 2001