Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria and life prediction: Application to gas turbine blade
Source abstract
Abstract
A recent work conducted by the authors (Maktouf and Sai, 2015) demonstrated that the root cause of the premature blade failure was caused by high-cycle fatigue (HCF) mechanism initiated at a localized carbon-rich area inducing grain boundary brittleness. The blade was subject to multiaxial cyclic loadings during its service life and any attempt to assess component fatigue strength leads to the question of choosing an appropriate fatigue design criterion. In this paper several multiaxial fatigue models are applied as post-processing step of the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) output results and the estimated fatigue lifetimes were assessed under different loading conditions. The material fatigue parameters, required as an input to the selected fatigue models were determined through a series of bending and torsion tests on specimens made of aged Inconel 718. A numerical post-processing algorithm was developed for Fatemi-Socie fatigue criterion and included as additional post-computation model in the used computer aided fatigue damage evaluation tool. The authors point out that the majority of the multiaxial fatigue studies available in the literature are conducted mainly for correlating the experimental laboratory results on specimens while they have been used in the frame of this study to investigate their application to an industrial case.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Mechanical Failure Analysis and Simulation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. An investigation of premature fatigue failures of gas turbine blade10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.015 ↗
2. Engineering and metallographic aspects of gas turbine engine failure investigation: identifying the causes
3. Gas turbine blade failures – causes avoidance and troubleshooting
4. A comparative study of design code criteria for prediction of the fatigue limit under in-phase and out-of-phase tension-torsion cycles10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.10.015 ↗
5. A critical review on multiaxial fatigue assessments of metals10.1016/0142-1123(96)00002-3 ↗
6. An experimental evaluation of three critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.10.028 ↗
7. Comparative study of multiaxial fatigue damage models for ductile structural steels and brittle materials10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.01.006 ↗
8. Critical issues in high cycle fatigue10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00074-2 ↗
9. Evaluation and comparison of several multiaxial fatigue criteria10.1016/S0142-1123(03)00110-5 ↗
10. Comparative study and link between mesoscopic and energetic approaches in high cycle multiaxial fatigue10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00100-6 ↗
11. Evaluation of multiaxial fatigue criteria under irregular loading10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00013-0 ↗
12. Multiaxial fatigue: an overview and some approximation models for life estimation10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.01.003 ↗
13. Selection of multiaxial fatigue damage model based on the dominated loading modes10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.12.006 ↗
14. Multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criterion and life prediction for metals10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.01.003 ↗
15. H B, Findley WN, Coleman JJ. Theory for combined bending and torsion fatigue with data for 4030 steel. In: International conference on fatigue of metals. New York: The Institution of Mechanical Engineers; 1956.
16. A critical plane approach to multiaxial fatigue damage including out of phase loading10.1111/j.1460-2695.1988.tb01169.x ↗
17. Palin-Luc SLT. A multiaxial fatigue testing machine for variable amplitude loadings of bending and torsion. In: Proceedings of 4th ICBMFF, May 31–June 3, 1994, Paris, vol. 1; 1994. p. 449–59.
18. Multiaxial life predictions in absence of any fatigue properties10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.02.020 ↗
19. Strain-controlled fatigue properties of steels and some simple approximations10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00026-8 ↗
20. Estimation methods for fatigue properties of steels under axial and torsional loading10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00190-6 ↗
21. A modified universal slopes equation for estimation of fatigue characteristics of metals10.1115/1.3226010 ↗
22. Baumel Jr. A, Seeger T. Materials data for cyclic loading, supplement 1. P.O. Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier Science Publishers; 1990.
23. Probabilistic modeling of S–N curves10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.04.015 ↗
24. Estimating S–N curves and their scatter using a differential ant-stigmergy algorithm10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.02.015 ↗
25. A new function for fatigue curves characterization and its multiple merits10.1016/S0142-1123(00)00082-7 ↗
26. Sines · 1959
27. Besson J, Leriche R, Foerch R, Cailletaud G. Object-oriented programming applied to the finite element method. Part II. application to material behaviors 1998;7:567–88.
28. Crossland B. Effect of large hydrostatic pressures on the torsional fatigue strength of an alloy steel. In: Proceedings of international conference on fatigue of metals. London: IMechE; 1956. p. 138–49.
29. Sur la resistance a la fatigue des metaux
30. Critical plane approaches for multiaxial fatigue damage assessment
31. Hoeft RKR, Janawitz J. Heavy-duty gas turbine operating and maintenance considerations. In: GER-3620J – GE Energy Services. Atlanta (GA).