The influence of phase angle, strain range and peak cycle temperature on the TMF crack initiation behaviour and damage mechanisms of the nickel-based superalloy, RR1000
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Thermo-mechanical fatigue (TMF) tests including 0°, 90°, −90°, 45° −135° and −180°, phasing (φ) between mechanical loading and temperature were undertaken on a polycrystalline nickel-based superalloy, RR1000. Mechanical loading was employed through strain control whilst 300–700 °C and 300–750 °C thermal cycles were achieved with induction heating and forced air cooling. Mechanical strain ranges from 0.7 to 1.4% were employed. Results show that, for the strain ranges tested, TMF life is significantly affected by the employed phase angle. Furthermore the strain range and peak cycle temperature used has a substantial influence on the significance of dominant damage mechanisms, and resultant life. Various metallographic examination techniques have outlined that the dominant damage mechanisms are creep deformation at higher temperatures and early cracking of oxide layers at lower temperatures.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Standard practice for strain controlled thermomechanical fatigue testing, E2368-10, ASTM; 2010.
2. Metallic materials, fatigue testing, Strain-controlled thermomechanical fatigue testing method, 12111, ISO; 2011.
3. Research and development into a European code of practice for strain controlled thermo-mechanical fatigue testing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.052 ↗
4. Jones JP, Brookes SP, Whittaker MT, Lancaster RJ, Ward B. Assessment of infrared thermography for cyclic high-temperature measurement and control. In: 4th Evaluation of existing and new sensor technologies for fatigue, fracture and mechanical testing. Toronto: ASTM International; 2015. p. 186–206.10.1520/STP158420140080 ↗
5. Thermo-mechanical fatigue of a polycrystalline superalloy: the effect of phase angle on TMF life and failure10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.01.042 ↗
6. Hammer J, Affeldt EE, Huber U, Lundblad H. Analysis of thermal gradients during cyclic thermal loading under high heating rates. Thermomechanical fatigue behaviour of materials, vol. 4; 2003.10.1520/STP11443S ↗
7. Thermal-mechanical and isothermal fatigue of IN 792 CC10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00281-5 ↗
8. Thermo-mechanical fatigue of Mar-M247: Part 1—experiments10.1115/1.2903189 ↗
9. Mechanical and microstructural assessments of RR1000 to IN718 inertia welds – effects of welding parameters10.1179/174328407X243997 ↗
10. Thermomechanical and isothermal fatigue behavior of bare and coated superalloys10.1115/1.2805939 ↗
11. Sommer C, Bayerlein M, Hartnagel W. Deformation and failure mechanisms of DSCM247LC under TMF and LCF loading. In: 81st AGARD conference on thermal mechanical fatigue of aircraft engine materials, Canada; 1995. p. 11–12.
12. Crack propagation and life prediction in a nickel-based superalloy under TMF conditions
13. Thermo-mechanical fatigue of Mar-M247: Part 2—life prediction10.1115/1.2903191 ↗
14. Effect of reinforcement volume fraction on the thermo-mechanical fatigue behavior of SiCW/6061Al composites10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00260-0 ↗
15. A comparative study on thermomechanical and low cycle fatigue failures of a single crystal nickel-based superalloy10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.009 ↗
16. Thermomechanical fatigue behavior and life prediction of a cast nickel-based superalloy10.1016/j.msea.2006.06.061 ↗
17. High temperature low cycle fatigue behavior of Ni-base superalloy M96310.1016/j.msea.2005.03.105 ↗
18. Influence of phase angle on lifetime, cyclic deformation and damage behavior of Mar-M247 LC under thermo-mechanical fatigue10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.055 ↗